Axonius vs Bitsight comparison

Axonius and BitSight are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. Axonius is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while BitSight is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Axonius holds a 1.5% mindshare in IVRM, compared to BitSight’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of BitSight users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 8 Axonius reviews

2,627 Views
158 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitsight

Read 9 Bitsight reviews

2,376 Views
1,283 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axonius

Bitsight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Bitsight and Axonius compete in the cybersecurity sector. Axonius appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set, despite higher costs associated with Bitsight.

Features: Bitsight offers risk assessment, cyber risk exposure insights, and advanced API for system integration. Axonius provides asset management, security integration features, and a platform for extensive connector support.

Room for Improvement: Bitsight requires better trial access and customization options. Additionally, a more user-friendly interface could enhance its usability. Axonius could improve on comprehensive support for all third-party solutions and enhance its machine learning features. More detailed reporting options would also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitsight offers a straightforward deployment process with comprehensive support services. Axonius provides user-friendly deployment, exceptional customer service, and emphasizes scalability and adaptability.

Pricing and ROI: Bitsight has a higher initial cost but promises substantial ROI through detailed risk analysis. Axonius offers competitive pricing and demonstrates strong ROI by enhancing operational efficiencies. Its cost-effective approach appeals to organizations seeking scalability without quality compromise.

To learn more, read our detailed Axonius vs. Bitsight Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Bitsight

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (2nd)

Bitsight

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Attack Surface Management (ASM) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Axonius is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitsight is 7.5%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bitsight	7.5%
Axonius	1.5%
Other	91.0%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

Sakkemgari Tamagari

Director of cloud security at Nuxeo

Centralized asset tracking has transformed governance and now speeds incident response

I would add that currently, the tool supports some integrations, but we would expect it to support broader integration with other security tools, observability, or any other cloud integrations. One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved. The user interface needs improvement because it is a bit laggy sometimes, making it not straightforward when we want to identify things quickly, leading us to go in different directions which could be better tied together in one place.

Read full review

Suresh A.

Senior AIML Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Continuous monitoring has strengthened external security and improved customer trust

There are areas for improvement; we do notice sometimes finding vulnerabilities which gives us visibility to find them quickly. However, there could be a mechanism they can build on top of that for validation as they identify the issues. What will the real risk be for that identifiable issue? Sometimes it could be open because of the traffic; how they detected it could be seen as vulnerable, but upon testing, it might not be a real issue. It could be a false positive because there could be a honeypot that we built. My thinking is about validation, so if they can build that validation part before they expose the risk to the specific asset, that would help. Additionally, based on their reporting, they could also build risk scores and prioritization, which would also aid us. I would suggest adding dashboards and custom reporting, which could help us by enabling rich custom reports with filters. That is especially for leadership because they will not look at each technical area, but overall they would be looking at the risk score and what the assets or critical exposure areas are. Customizable reporting based on requirements would be valuable. I chose 9 out of 10 because the reporting and dashboards would be the first thing I would consider for improvement, and then the second is about the validation part, which could probably improve to 10 out of 10. I cannot think of too much for additional improvements. Maybe some good automation with the API solutions that could be integrated with the CI/CD pipeline or DevOps tools we are running would also be automated and tested.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"With this solution in place, we are now 100% compliant along with security functions or operations area management."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"Its customer service team responds quickly."

"Bitsight gives me a holistic view of my entire security posture, which is something any organization would want to have after getting a tool such as Bitsight."

"I prefer BitSight due to its patch management capabilities. The score is a valuable feature. I have contacted the customer support through e-mail and their response rate is fast. I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"Bitsight has positively impacted my organization by improving security and customer trust, giving us continuous monitoring so we now find misconfigurations within hours instead of days or weeks, which directly improves our overall security posture and reduces risk as we catch high-risk exposures early, especially unexpected cloud assets or testing endpoints that accidentally went public."

"My advice to others looking into using Bitsight is that it provides a lot of information that was not available before, and it is especially good in recon as it can identify many things about an organization that have never been found earlier, making it a valuable tool."

"Offers open ports from an external point of view."

"The product helps us identify the vulnerabilities of internet-facing applications."

"The best thing about BitSight is the comprehensive list of risk vectors, covering compromised systems, diligence failures, and behavioral anomalies."

More Bitsight pros

Cons

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"The solution’s benchmarking should be improved."

"I chose 8 out of 10 because if we receive invites from clients every 45 days, our subscription ends, and we have to renew it."

"There are areas for improvement; we do notice sometimes finding vulnerabilities which gives us visibility to find them quickly. However, there could be a mechanism they can build on top of that for validation as they identify the issues."

"Data enrichment is the major issue."

"BitSight could improve the classes and lower-level detections of anomalies that compound the information used to compute the rating."

"We found that some of the findings are clear false positives, but they still report that, and based on that, the rating goes down until we rectify them."

"At the moment, when the vulnerability score decreases, it remains the same for quite a while, even though issues are resolved in 24 hours."

"There may be room for improvement in the methodology for identifying findings, as occasional errors occur on the technical side."

More Bitsight cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"The solution's price is average."

"The product has a reasonable price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

I think I am good so far with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing; I do not see any disturbances there, but it is working well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My main use case for Axonius is config management and asset inventory. I use Axonius to maintain the asset inventory up to date and also to identify the owners quickly; these are the primary requir...

See all answers

What do you like most about BitSight?

The solution is user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BitSight?

The product is a little expensive and very oriented to large companies.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BitSight?

See all answers

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 27% of the time

ServiceNow vs Axonius

Compared 12% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 10% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

SecurityScorecard vs Bitsight

Compared 21% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Bitsight

Compared 6% of the time

Cortex Xpanse vs Bitsight

Compared 5% of the time

Black Kite vs Bitsight

Compared 5% of the time

UpGuard Vendor Risk vs Bitsight

Compared 3% of the time

More Bitsight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

January 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

Bitsight

January 2026

Download Bitsight product report

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

BitSight transforms how organizations manage cyber risk. The BitSight Security Ratings Platform applies sophisticated algorithms, producing daily security ratings that range from 250 to 900, to help organizations manage their own security performance; mitigate third party risk; underwrite cyber insurance policies; conduct financial diligence; and assess aggregate risk. With over 2,100 global customers and the largest ecosystem of users and information, BitSight is the Standard in Security Ratings. For more information, please visit www.bitsight.com, read our blog or follow @BitSight on Twitter.

BitSight

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Fannie Mae, Cabela's, BNP Paribas, PWC, AIR Worldwide, Con Edison, The Container Store, OshKosh, Steris, University of South Florida, Emblem Health, Lloyds Bank

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Bitsight

December 2025

Free Report: Axonius vs. Bitsight

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius vs. Bitsight and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axonius vs. Bitsight report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.