No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Armis Centrix™ for Asset Management and Security vs Axonius comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis Centrix™ for Asset Ma...
Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Axonius
Ranking in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) category, the mindshare of Armis Centrix™ for Asset Management and Security is 4.1%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Axonius is 28.4%, down from 35.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Axonius28.4%
Armis Centrix™ for Asset Management and Security4.1%
Other67.5%
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Armis Centrix™ for Asset Management and Security?
Leave a review
SK
Director of cloud security at Nuxeo
Centralized asset tracking has transformed governance and now speeds incident response
I would add that currently, the tool supports some integrations, but we would expect it to support broader integration with other security tools, observability, or any other cloud integrations. One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved. The user interface needs improvement because it is a bit laggy sometimes, making it not straightforward when we want to identify things quickly, leading us to go in different directions which could be better tied together in one place.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.
897,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?
For pricing, I would rate it as a 7, where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.
What needs improvement with Axonius?
I am generally satisfied with Axonius's reporting features. The reporting part could be simplified for the end user, and it might be beneficial to have tutorials or drafts from the vendor. I want t...
What is your primary use case for Axonius?
My use case for Axonius is extensive as I utilize it in multiple processes, and I would describe the use case for Axonius as great.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera
Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius, Armis, Qualys and others in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM). Updated: May 2026.
897,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.