No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BMC AMI DevOps for Db2 vs BMC AMI DevX comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevOps for Db2
Ranking in Mainframe Application Development
4th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
BMC AMI DevX
Ranking in Mainframe Application Development
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (3rd), Database Development and Management (9th), Test Data Management (2nd), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (3rd), AI Software Development (23rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Mainframe Application Development category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevOps for Db2 is 5.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 24.1%, down from 38.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mainframe Application Development Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX24.1%
BMC AMI DevOps for Db25.1%
Other70.8%
Mainframe Application Development
 

Featured Reviews

Jeemit Zaveri - PeerSpot reviewer
Mainframe Modernization Co E & Transformation Lead at cmc
Schema comparison has improved automated impact analysis and now needs native mainframe deployment
There is an area in this product that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future. This product is a containerized product, which is good news and a very good part. However, the product can run on Linux and I think it can also run in Windows, but what I am looking for is that if this product is to cater to mainframe-based database changes, then the product should also be deployable on mainframe. Containerization is not new in mainframe and is possible, with an offering called ZCX, a containerization offering already available on the mainframe. Rather than hosting on a Linux machine, I could host it in the mainframe natively and make the changes in the mainframe. First, from an architectural standpoint, I want to see containerization running natively on the mainframe rather than deploying on Linux and then making a connection to the mainframe to make the changes in the mainframe. Second, the entire ecosystem of Db2 includes a product called Command Center, and the user interface of the Command Center looks a bit traditional in nature. With today's emerging UI frameworks, that interface is extremely traditional. There is improvement opportunity in that area. From the demonstration, I learned that having those things pre-recorded on YouTube or somewhere already hosted would be helpful. There is a playlist on YouTube, but it is more for Jenkins, while my shop uses Azure DevOps and they also have an offering on Azure DevOps, but there is no video for that. If we would not have had that demonstration from their side, we would have struggled. The improvement that I suggest is that the things people generally struggle with is the starting point and the demonstration of how to use the product. This can be very well documented upfront, or in today's date, documentation is not something that one looks for. One directly looks for a demonstration. If there is something ready to use, something one can just see, observe, and understand, then it will reduce the number of questions from the user side.
Mitanshu Shrimali - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Modern workflows have accelerated mainframe delivery and simplify understanding legacy code
BMC AMI DevX can be improved primarily by streamlining initial configuration and installation, simplifying advanced documentation, and enhancing UI/UX feature discoverability. While the platform successfully bridges modern IDEs such as VS Code with z/OS, user feedback highlights the need for simplifying setup and onboarding configuration. The initial installation and login process can be simplified. Although it feels complex initially, once completed, there is nothing to do with installation repeatedly since it is a one-time process. However, it is still somewhat complex. Basic tutorials are available that address teams implementing the configuration of multi-vendor tools and integration, but documentation gaps exist that frequently force heavy reliance on vendor support. Additionally, certain components across the workspace and diagnostic tools retain a legacy feel or hide powerful features behind deep menus, so UI/UX features can be simplified. Integrating with non-BMC enterprise testing or new CI/CD orchestrators can require custom engineering rather than native plug-and-play connectors. Optimizing large-scale performance is also important, as heavy resource consumption during deep runtime analysis for large-scale code mapping can impact performance over slower network connections for extremely dense application modules.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Schema Comparison is a game-changer feature."
"Otherwise, it works fabulously, and I think everyone should adopt it."
"I like that Compuware File-AID can actually map out control sections within load modules, or, as they're now known, program objects."
"From a user perspective, the GUIs make it easier for people to see and interact with files on the mainframe."
"As far as the software vendors that I work with go, Compuware has some of the best support, in terms of listening to customer requests and accepting enhancements to the product and the like."
"The smart editor helps because it will code-complete for me. I can see code working a lot faster and I'm able to get things coded in less time."
"It speeds up processes, makes things easier, more efficient, and from a mainframe perspective, the way the mainframe is utilized has become that much easier."
"We had parallel development before, but the way ISPW implements it is better. It has more control and oversight of the process, whereas before, it was like the Wild West. Everybody could have their own package with their own version of the component in it... ISPW is constantly aware of it. It notifies when someone else is using or has a different version of that component."
"It helps our staff work by speeding up their documentation process."
 

Cons

"From the demonstration, I learned that having those things pre-recorded on YouTube or somewhere already hosted would be helpful."
"An area for improvement in BMC AMI DevX would be the user interface and overall usability, which can feel a little complex for new users coming from modern development tools."
"I choose eight out of ten because of two frustrating parts: one is the navigation complexity sometimes, and the other is the configuration that gets erased over reboots or cleaning of the saved directory configs."
"Better discussions to identify inventory prior to the start of any migration would be helpful for potential clients that have applications with code that is not modified often."
"What keeps it from being a 10 is mainly user experience, as the login and startup process can be frustrating, and the initial setup can also be challenging for new users."
"BMC AMI DevX can be improved by simplifying the user experience."
"There are some features that are not well documented, so documentation could use a little help, on things like setting up deployment and which structures in the database correspond to which tables."
"It would be good if the vendors would work together or at least have some collaboration between them, so they would know what would work and what wouldn't work. Right now, the way things are working, they're relying on the customer to make everything work."
"While I am aware of the possibility to integrate Git with BMC AMI DevX zAdviser, this integration does not fit within our solution landscape."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."
"The price point is great."
"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."
"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."
"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."
"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Application Development solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
25%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise30
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevOps for Db2?
There is an area in this product that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future. This product is a containerized product, which is good news and a very good part. However, the product ...
What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevOps for Db2?
The use case involves changing a definition, table definition, table space definition, or index definition. BMC AMI DevOps for Db2 with Change Manager provides functionality where the developer can...
What advice do you have for others considering BMC AMI DevOps for Db2?
The term automated testing does not quite resonate with me because for automated testing, in Schema Comparison, it helps to do the dry run. When implementing the change, verification is done, and n...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?
I do not have direct information about the setup cost and pricing and licensing. From the implementation perspective, I think the initial configuration can require some effort to align the product ...
What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?
I would suggest making the initial installation and configuration simpler, especially for new users. The login and startup experience could also be improved by reducing repeated login prompts and t...
What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?
BMC AMI DevX is used primarily for mainframe application development and troubleshooting, particularly for COBOL and JCL. I use it to edit and navigate code, browse datasets, and submit jobs, and a...
 

Also Known As

No data available
File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Totalsec, Colruyt Group, Helsana, Amadeus
NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari