BMC AMI DevX vs Qlik Gold Client comparison

BMC and Qlik are both solutions in the Test Data Management category. BMC is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qlik is ranked #11. BMC holds a 11.9% mindshare in TDM, compared to Qlik’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 20 BMC AMI DevX reviews

6,230 Views
810 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Qlik Gold Client

Read 1 Qlik Gold Client review

289 Views
289 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Qlik Gold Client

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

BMC AMI DevX and Qlik Gold Client compete in enterprise data management, each offering unique benefits. BMC AMI DevX takes the lead in support and pricing, while Qlik Gold Client outshines with comprehensive features.

Features: BMC AMI DevX delivers advanced mainframe application management, streamlined DevOps integration, and automated workflows. Qlik Gold Client provides powerful data replication, seamless SAP migrations, and robust data management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI DevX is noted for straightforward deployment and exceptional customer service, offering an easy implementation experience. Qlik Gold Client demands more technical expertise but offers responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: BMC AMI DevX offers competitive pricing with a balanced ROI due to lower setup costs, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. Qlik Gold Client requires a higher investment but ensures substantial ROI through its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Data Management Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Data Management

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Test Data Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (6th), Database Development and Management (16th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (4th), AI Software Development (217th)

Qlik Gold Client

Ranking in Test Data Management

11th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Test Data Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 11.9%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Gold Client is 2.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Data Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	11.9%
Qlik Gold Client	2.8%
Other	85.3%

Test Data Management

Featured Reviews

Abulfazal Irfan

Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Tight deployment controls have secured production and simplified complex release rollbacks

The best feature of BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline that impresses me is the fallback functionality. The fallback functionality impresses me because when developers deploy large releases involving multiple components, such as COBOL programs, underlying copy books, and CICS modules, backing out changes would typically become a nightmare. With ISPW, developers can back out the entire release or entire package. If they deployed 100 components and want to back out everything, they can do so with one function and back out all components without worrying about backing out each individual component. They can back out the entire deployment set, which handles everything and brings them back to the previous versions. Developers can also selectively back out a subset of the deployed components. They also have the ability to revert to not just the most previous version but can go back several versions if they choose to do so. This gives them a lot of flexibility.

Read full review

reviewer2010738

Senior Manager, Customer Life Cycle Management Specialist at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Effective and easy to use but performance lags with large data sets

Our company has fifty users who conduct analytics for many use cases. The solution is effective and easy to use in comparison to other products that require some technical knowledge. Performance is sometimes affected when loading millions of data records. The PC or VMware sometimes takes too…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The debugging is really the most important feature, enabling us to be able to step through."

"The most valuable feature of Topaz is Xpediter. It's more flexible than Xpediter through MVS."

"With the use of ISPW, we were able to reduce our deployment time for specific applications by utilizing the auto-deploy features."

"The smart editor helps because it will code-complete for me. I can see code working a lot faster and I'm able to get things coded in less time."

"We have seen an improvement in the rate and level of quality at which we deploy changes."

"Once we got the configurations and deployment rolled out, it was very stable. I haven't had any major issues with Eclipse or the Topaz Workbench plugins."

"For bank applications, DB2 is the best on the market."

"It's a modernized development portal and helps reduce the learning curve for younger people coming in to work on the platform,"

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"The solution is effective and easy to use."

Cons

"The area for improvement is related to the testing tools that are available for unit testing or acceptance testing. I know they have some out there that we are not licensed for at this time, but it seems like some of the Eclipse tools that are used for other programming languages, they're all just built-in and they're a little more intuitive to the developers. Making those testing tools as intuitive as possible, and as integrated as possible into the workbench, would be really beneficial."

"Better discussions to identify inventory prior to the start of any migration would be helpful for potential clients that have applications with code that is not modified often."

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."

"The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment."

"When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?"

"Initial setup can be tricky in some cases."

"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."

"Their technical support could be better. There were times where, when we reported bugs, they would fix one bug but add another one. That's probably because of their support model. A lot of organizations are developing software using Agile rather than the Waterfall method, so things are happening all over the place. You get things quicker, but sometimes one fix will break another one or add other bugs."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"Performance is sometimes affected when loading millions of data records."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"The price point is great."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"The price is a bit high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Data Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Insurance Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

I don't directly deal with the pricing side of the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

It's a very complicated tool. Sometimes the customer wants better, faster transaction times. They want the solution to move as fast as possible. We're trying to scale and grow our application with ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

We do development for our customers and we use Topaz to do backend systems for some Latin American banks. It's for enterprise data. It runs on AWS. I'm working on performance testing to do batch pe...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 9% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

DATPROF vs Qlik Gold Client

Compared 37% of the time

More Qlik Gold Client Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

May 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Data Management

April 2026

Download Qlik Gold Client product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

No data available

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?

Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

Qlik Gold Client is a strategic data management tool designed to optimize data replication and synchronization within SAP landscapes. It enables businesses to manage test data efficiently while maintaining data security and integrity.

Enhancing the performance of IT systems, Qlik Gold Client supports seamless data transfer across SAP environments. Ideal for ensuring data consistency during system migrations or upgrades, it assists in streamlining business processes and improving productivity. Designed for scalability and flexibility, it facilitates comprehensive data management solutions tailored to specific IT infrastructures.

What are the key features of Qlik Gold Client?

Data Replication: Ensures accurate and timely copies of data across SAP systems, enhancing data availability.
Data Security: Provides robust mechanisms to maintain data privacy and integrity during transfers.
Flexible Data Management: Offers customizable options to meet unique data handling requirements.
Performance Optimization: Streamlines data processes to boost system efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Minimizes expenses related to data management by automating tasks.
Time Savings: Reduces the time required for data replication, leading to faster project timelines.
Enhanced Productivity: By optimizing data handling processes, it enables IT teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

In industries such as finance and manufacturing, Qlik Gold Client provides significant value through its ability to handle complex data environments. Its implementation supports industry-specific needs, ensuring accurate data flows, regulatory compliance, and streamlined operations, thus elevating data-driven decision-making capabilities.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom

IHS Markit, Miller Insurance Services, Swiss Life, Bitmarck, DomainPower

Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, Broadcom, Informatica and others in Test Data Management. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Data Management vendors.

We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.