BMC AMI DevX vs Qlik Gold Client comparison

BMC and Qlik are both solutions in the Test Data Management category. BMC is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Qlik is ranked #11. BMC holds a 12.2% mindshare in TDM, compared to Qlik’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 21 BMC AMI DevX reviews

6,965 Views
905 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Qlik Gold Client

Read 1 Qlik Gold Client review

320 Views
320 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Qlik Gold Client

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

BMC AMI DevX and Qlik Gold Client compete in enterprise data management, each offering unique benefits. BMC AMI DevX takes the lead in support and pricing, while Qlik Gold Client outshines with comprehensive features.

Features: BMC AMI DevX delivers advanced mainframe application management, streamlined DevOps integration, and automated workflows. Qlik Gold Client provides powerful data replication, seamless SAP migrations, and robust data management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI DevX is noted for straightforward deployment and exceptional customer service, offering an easy implementation experience. Qlik Gold Client demands more technical expertise but offers responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: BMC AMI DevX offers competitive pricing with a balanced ROI due to lower setup costs, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. Qlik Gold Client requires a higher investment but ensures substantial ROI through its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Data Management Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Data Management

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Test Data Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (4th), Database Development and Management (16th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (4th), AI Software Development (202nd)

Qlik Gold Client

Ranking in Test Data Management

11th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Test Data Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 12.2%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Gold Client is 3.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Data Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	12.2%
Qlik Gold Client	3.0%
Other	84.8%

Test Data Management

Featured Reviews

Abulfazal Irfan

Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Tight deployment controls have secured production and simplified complex release rollbacks

The best feature of BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline that impresses me is the fallback functionality. The fallback functionality impresses me because when developers deploy large releases involving multiple components, such as COBOL programs, underlying copy books, and CICS modules, backing out changes would typically become a nightmare. With ISPW, developers can back out the entire release or entire package. If they deployed 100 components and want to back out everything, they can do so with one function and back out all components without worrying about backing out each individual component. They can back out the entire deployment set, which handles everything and brings them back to the previous versions. Developers can also selectively back out a subset of the deployed components. They also have the ability to revert to not just the most previous version but can go back several versions if they choose to do so. This gives them a lot of flexibility.

Read full review

reviewer2010738

Senior Manager, Customer Life Cycle Management Specialist at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Effective and easy to use but performance lags with large data sets

Our company has fifty users who conduct analytics for many use cases. The solution is effective and easy to use in comparison to other products that require some technical knowledge. Performance is sometimes affected when loading millions of data records. The PC or VMware sometimes takes too…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My guess is this would have taken twice as long, or we would have had many more issues without using Xpediter."

"From a user perspective, the GUIs make it easier for people to see and interact with files on the mainframe."

"Test data management capabilities are good."

"I like that Compuware File-AID can actually map out control sections within load modules, or, as they're now known, program objects."

"It's a modernized development portal and helps reduce the learning curve for younger people coming in to work on the platform,"

"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."

"The visual ability to see potential downstream impacts to changes being made assists our developers in understanding the impact associated with their change."

"The smart editor helps because it will code-complete for me. I can see code working a lot faster and I'm able to get things coded in less time."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"The solution is effective and easy to use."

Cons

"Their technical support could be better. There were times where, when we reported bugs, they would fix one bug but add another one. That's probably because of their support model. A lot of organizations are developing software using Agile rather than the Waterfall method, so things are happening all over the place. You get things quicker, but sometimes one fix will break another one or add other bugs."

"It's a very complicated tool."

"I'm always looking for improvement in things like the documentation, to make things a little bit easier and simpler to understand, a place where people can go to troubleshoot issues."

"Topaz Workbench often doesn't play well with other plugins in the environment."

"One thing I would really like to see some improvement on is the promotion diagnostic messages. It invokes utilities "under the covers" to copy components, and it does not echo back any of the error messages from those utilities."

"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."

"One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution."

"We have noticed that Topaz supported Eclipse environments are rather old. It would be nice if Topaz were compatible with the more current Eclipse releases."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"Performance is sometimes affected when loading millions of data records."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"The price point is great."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"The price is a bit high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Data Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

I don't directly deal with the pricing side of the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?

To improve BMC AMI DevX, consideration should be given to cloud-style provisioning and development models, as well as integration of more AI capabilities. Enhancements in VS Code extensions to deve...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?

BMC AMI DevX solutions are primarily used for mainframe-based resources and application development, encompassing not only COBOL but also Workbench and VS Code for various purposes. Data management...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 7% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

DATPROF vs Qlik Gold Client

Compared 41% of the time

More Qlik Gold Client Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

June 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Data Management

May 2026

Download Qlik Gold Client product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

No data available

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a mainframe DevOps platform for IBM Z environments that helps development and platform engineering teams increase release velocity, reduce change risk, and build a sustainable mainframe developer workforce.

Whether the priority is attracting the next generation of mainframe talent, safely evolving decades of business-critical code, accelerating release velocity, or demonstrating development ROI to leadership — BMC AMI DevX is designed to address all on a single platform. Teams can connect existing tools and adopt capabilities incrementally using an open-borders integration approach.

A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that customers using BMC AMI DevX onboarded developers 50% faster, completed code changes 33% faster, increased release frequency by 50%, and reduced change failure rate by 33%.

Key capabilities:

Modern IDE integration (VS Code, Eclipse) with a unified development environment that reduces context switching
AI-powered code analysis including dependency mapping, impact analysis, and runtime execution path visualization
Automated unit, functional, integration, and performance testing with code coverage analysis
Git-compatible CI/CD integration with event-driven webhooks and an open plug-in library
DORA metrics and DevOps KPI tracking with AI/ML anomaly detection across the mainframe SDLC

BMC

Qlik Gold Client is a strategic data management tool designed to optimize data replication and synchronization within SAP landscapes. It enables businesses to manage test data efficiently while maintaining data security and integrity.

Enhancing the performance of IT systems, Qlik Gold Client supports seamless data transfer across SAP environments. Ideal for ensuring data consistency during system migrations or upgrades, it assists in streamlining business processes and improving productivity. Designed for scalability and flexibility, it facilitates comprehensive data management solutions tailored to specific IT infrastructures.

What are the key features of Qlik Gold Client?

Data Replication: Ensures accurate and timely copies of data across SAP systems, enhancing data availability.
Data Security: Provides robust mechanisms to maintain data privacy and integrity during transfers.
Flexible Data Management: Offers customizable options to meet unique data handling requirements.
Performance Optimization: Streamlines data processes to boost system efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Minimizes expenses related to data management by automating tasks.
Time Savings: Reduces the time required for data replication, leading to faster project timelines.
Enhanced Productivity: By optimizing data handling processes, it enables IT teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

In industries such as finance and manufacturing, Qlik Gold Client provides significant value through its ability to handle complex data environments. Its implementation supports industry-specific needs, ensuring accurate data flows, regulatory compliance, and streamlined operations, thus elevating data-driven decision-making capabilities.

Qlik

Sample Customers

NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari

IHS Markit, Miller Insurance Services, Swiss Life, Bitmarck, DomainPower

Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, Informatica, Broadcom and others in Test Data Management. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Data Management vendors.

We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.