BMC AMI DevX vs Qlik Gold Client comparison

BMC and Qlik are both solutions in the Test Data Management category. BMC is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while Qlik is ranked #12. BMC holds a 12.1% mindshare in TDM, compared to Qlik’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 23 BMC AMI DevX reviews

7,985 Views
1,038 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Qlik Gold Client

Read 1 Qlik Gold Client review

345 Views
345 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

Qlik Gold Client

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

BMC AMI DevX and Qlik Gold Client compete in enterprise data management, each offering unique benefits. BMC AMI DevX takes the lead in support and pricing, while Qlik Gold Client outshines with comprehensive features.

Features: BMC AMI DevX delivers advanced mainframe application management, streamlined DevOps integration, and automated workflows. Qlik Gold Client provides powerful data replication, seamless SAP migrations, and robust data management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI DevX is noted for straightforward deployment and exceptional customer service, offering an easy implementation experience. Qlik Gold Client demands more technical expertise but offers responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: BMC AMI DevX offers competitive pricing with a balanced ROI due to lower setup costs, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. Qlik Gold Client requires a higher investment but ensures substantial ROI through its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Data Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Data Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Test Data Management

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (2nd), Database Development and Management (11th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (3rd), AI Software Development (30th)

Qlik Gold Client

Ranking in Test Data Management

12th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Test Data Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 12.1%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Gold Client is 2.6%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Data Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	12.1%
Qlik Gold Client	2.6%
Other	85.3%

Test Data Management

Featured Reviews

Wisdom Mbiza

Product Engineer at Absa Group

Modern tools have boosted mainframe file extraction speed and simplified everyday workflows

I definitely think BMC AMI DevX could be improved or enhanced in terms of the logging in features. BMC AMI DevX's logging in feature is not so great. Whenever you try to log in, it always prompts you for passwords. Then when you have to switch sessions, because we usually have to switch between production and UAT, there's no quick way of switching between the two. Every time you try to switch, it prompts you to log in. Additionally, there's a pop-up that I always receive. When you click X on it, it doesn't disappear. Eventually, I just end up minimizing it. Furthermore, the startup of BMC AMI DevX takes a long time to start up before it loads. It doesn't just immediately start up and it's ready. It takes a good solid two to three minutes before it's ready so that you can work on it. BMC AMI DevX's logins and the other ones I can understand because security has to be there, but I do feel that once I've logged in, I shouldn't need to log in again. The startup problem is the annoying one because if I want to do something, I need to open it two or three minutes earlier to give it time to load up. The startup problem is the one that definitely needs to be addressed.

Read full review

reviewer2010738

Senior Manager, Customer Life Cycle Management Specialist at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Effective and easy to use but performance lags with large data sets

Our company has fifty users who conduct analytics for many use cases. The solution is effective and easy to use in comparison to other products that require some technical knowledge. Performance is sometimes affected when loading millions of data records. The PC or VMware sometimes takes too…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."

"The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is beneficial in application development."

"With the use of ISPW, we were able to reduce our deployment time for specific applications by utilizing the auto-deploy features."

"ISPW is an excellent product; it does everything the developers need it to do, we were able to build it and customize it very simply as we became more familiar with how the system works during installation, and it doesn't need a lot of care and feeding once it's up and running."

"BMC AMI DevX tools have noticeably impacted our developers' productivity and efficiency."

"The smart editor helps because it will code-complete for me. I can see code working a lot faster and I'm able to get things coded in less time."

"The debugging is really the most important feature, enabling us to be able to step through."

"For bank applications, DB2 is the best on the market."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"The solution is effective and easy to use."

Cons

"Their technical support could be better."

"I find it more cumbersome to use Topaz."

"Better discussions to identify inventory prior to the start of any migration would be helpful for potential clients that have applications with code that is not modified often."

"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."

"The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment."

"Topaz Workbench often doesn't play well with other plugins in the environment."

"The area for improvement is related to the testing tools that are available for unit testing or acceptance testing."

"There are some features that are not well documented, so documentation could use a little help, on things like setting up deployment and which structures in the database correspond to which tables."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"Performance is sometimes affected when loading millions of data records."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price point is great."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"The price is a bit high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Data Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

I don't directly deal with the pricing side of the solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?

I work on mainframe, and some of the developers prefer to code on BMC AMI DevX because it looks more modern. For me, my basic use of it is just to extract information. Most of the time we end up ha...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Gen vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

DATPROF vs Qlik Gold Client

Compared 42% of the time

More Qlik Gold Client Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

August 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Data Management

August 2026

Download Qlik Gold Client product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

No data available

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a mainframe DevOps platform for IBM Z environments that helps development and platform engineering teams increase release velocity, reduce change risk, and build a sustainable mainframe developer workforce.

Whether the priority is attracting the next generation of mainframe talent, safely evolving decades of business-critical code, accelerating release velocity, or demonstrating development ROI to leadership — BMC AMI DevX is designed to address all on a single platform. Teams can connect existing tools and adopt capabilities incrementally using an open-borders integration approach.

A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that customers using BMC AMI DevX onboarded developers 50% faster, completed code changes 33% faster, increased release frequency by 50%, and reduced change failure rate by 33%.

Key capabilities:

Modern IDE integration (VS Code, Eclipse) with a unified development environment that reduces context switching
AI-powered code analysis including dependency mapping, impact analysis, and runtime execution path visualization
Automated unit, functional, integration, and performance testing with code coverage analysis
Git-compatible CI/CD integration with event-driven webhooks and an open plug-in library
DORA metrics and DevOps KPI tracking with AI/ML anomaly detection across the mainframe SDLC

BMC

Qlik Gold Client is a strategic data management tool designed to optimize data replication and synchronization within SAP landscapes. It enables businesses to manage test data efficiently while maintaining data security and integrity.

Enhancing the performance of IT systems, Qlik Gold Client supports seamless data transfer across SAP environments. Ideal for ensuring data consistency during system migrations or upgrades, it assists in streamlining business processes and improving productivity. Designed for scalability and flexibility, it facilitates comprehensive data management solutions tailored to specific IT infrastructures.

What are the key features of Qlik Gold Client?

Data Replication: Ensures accurate and timely copies of data across SAP systems, enhancing data availability.
Data Security: Provides robust mechanisms to maintain data privacy and integrity during transfers.
Flexible Data Management: Offers customizable options to meet unique data handling requirements.
Performance Optimization: Streamlines data processes to boost system efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Minimizes expenses related to data management by automating tasks.
Time Savings: Reduces the time required for data replication, leading to faster project timelines.
Enhanced Productivity: By optimizing data handling processes, it enables IT teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

In industries such as finance and manufacturing, Qlik Gold Client provides significant value through its ability to handle complex data environments. Its implementation supports industry-specific needs, ensuring accurate data flows, regulatory compliance, and streamlined operations, thus elevating data-driven decision-making capabilities.

Qlik

Sample Customers

NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari

IHS Markit, Miller Insurance Services, Swiss Life, Bitmarck, DomainPower

Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce, Informatica, Broadcom and others in Test Data Management. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Data Management vendors.

We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.