BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs Pandora FMS comparison

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

632 Views
40 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and Pandora FMS are competitive products in enterprise IT management. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management excels in cloud service automation, making it ideal for large-scale cloud operations, while Pandora FMS stands out for its monitoring capabilities across diverse IT environments.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management provides seamless cloud orchestration, extensive integration capabilities, and automated service provisioning, catering to enterprises focused on efficient cloud management. Pandora FMS offers highly scalable monitoring, rapid adaptability to various IT infrastructures, and robust reporting features, appealing to organizations with diverse monitoring requirements. Pandora FMS's adaptability and comprehensive monitoring focus are notably advantageous.

Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could enhance its adaptability to smaller IT environments, improve the user interface for easier navigation, and offer more flexible pricing plans. Pandora FMS could improve its initial setup complexity, extend its integration capabilities with third-party tools, and enhance the availability of training resources for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management provides a structured deployment process suited for large cloud environments and offers substantial customer support for complex implementations. Pandora FMS provides a flexible deployment model that easily adjusts to varying IT environments, with dependable customer support enhancing its adaptability.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management has higher initial setup costs, aligning with its robust cloud automation capabilities and favorable ROI for cloud-intensive operations. Pandora FMS offers a more cost-effective setup, delivering a compelling ROI by ensuring comprehensive monitoring at a balanced price point, making it an economical option for monitoring scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: June 2025).

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Pandora FMS

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (39th)

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

28th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (45th), Server Monitoring (18th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (43rd), Log Management (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"I like this solution a lot because it has a very large Hispanic community and the platform looks very friendly."

"You can configure several types of architecture for high availability or load balancing."

"This product has allowed us to identify and correct certain issues that were affecting our solution."

"The solution is so lightweight that with only 4GB of ram, it allows keeping track of up to two hundred agents from a single console."

"Thanks to this software and to the work of the support team, we have everything under control."

"What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it."

"It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain."

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"Pandora could deliver better analytics out of the box. You can work around these limitations with the help of other tools like Grafana. The shortcomings are mostly on the graphical side. The built-in report generators are a bit limited in some areas."

"An update to the Android app would be appreciated."

"The product lacks APIs for integration with other systems."

"A nice feature in the next release would be an automation module to run workflow actions."

"We would like to see improvement in the mainframe integration that this solution is capable of."

"The price for Pandora FMS is expensive."

"I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring."

"It would be useful if Pandora FMS included an ISO image (or «software appliance») for each big company that leases virtual private machines (VPS), just like in AWS."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 61% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 27% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 17% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 14% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

Cloud Management

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Download Pandora FMS product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Pandora FMS