Board vs QlikView comparison

Board International and Qlik are both solutions in the Reporting category. Board International is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Qlik is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. Board International holds a 0.8% mindshare in RT, compared to Qlik’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Board International users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Board

Read 37 Board reviews

350 Views
70 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

QlikView

Read 162 QlikView reviews

1,560 Views
257 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Board

QlikView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

QlikView and Board are products competing in the business intelligence and analytics sector, with each focusing on data visualization and decision-making solutions. While Board offers an all-inclusive suite with analytics, planning, and simulation features, QlikView is known for its rapid in-memory data processing capabilities.

Features: QlikView features a powerful associative data model, quick response times, and agile analytics. Board provides a unified platform for analytics and planning, advanced simulation capabilities, and extensive customization options.

Room for Improvement: QlikView could improve its user interface, simplifying the learning curve for new users, and expand its deployment options. Board could benefit from reducing initial setup complexity, enhancing collaborative features, and offering more detailed documentation to ease troubleshooting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Board emphasizes flexibility and scalability in its cloud solutions and offers robust support services. In contrast, QlikView focuses on on-premises deployments and provides comprehensive documentation, though it presents a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: QlikView often incurs higher upfront costs but offers good ROI through efficient data processing. Board, while requiring more initial investment, offers a broader range of integrated tools, potentially resulting in greater cost savings and improved business outcomes over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. QlikView Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. QlikView

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.8

Organizations save time and reduce costs with Board's efficiency, enhancing ERP integration and streamlining municipal processes.

Sentiment score

6.5

QlikView offers quick returns and valuable insights despite perceived costs, challenging ROI calculation but often realized within six months.

It's hard for me to gauge the monetary benefits, but the time saved in budgeting and forecasting processes indicates a definite bonus.

reviewer2645016

Manager, Software Delivery at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Board report

The biggest return on investment is the time saving for the customer.

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.4

Board's customer service is praised for responsiveness and reliability, despite occasional communication issues, contributing to positive user experiences.

Sentiment score

6.1

QlikView's customer service is praised for responsiveness, community support, and efficiency, though experiences may vary by location.

As long as I go through my account manager, I receive very good support.

reviewer2645016

Manager, Software Delivery at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Board report

I would rate the customer support a solid 10.

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

Board efficiently manages scaling, offering flexibility and robust data processing, though some face scalability issues with larger Windows client data.

Sentiment score

7.0

QlikView is scalable with proper hardware, though high user counts may require infrastructure enhancements and favor Qlik Sense.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Board report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.1

Users generally find the platform stable, with occasional issues mostly due to user error or integration challenges.

Sentiment score

7.7

QlikView is praised for stability and robustness, with some resource intensity issues during heavy data processing but overall reliable.

Board's stability is excellent, with uptime around ninety-nine point nine percent, and I have not experienced any issues.

reviewer2645016

Manager, Software Delivery at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Board report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Room For Improvement

Board needs improvements in integration, user experience, data handling, and performance to optimize functionality and accessibility.

QlikView's outdated interface, scalability issues, and high costs drive users towards modern tools like Tableau, Power BI, and Qlik Sense.

If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance.

reviewer2645016

Manager, Software Delivery at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Board report

In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI.

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Setup Cost

Board offers flexible pricing, valued for cost-benefit despite being pricier than competitors; partner support is essential during implementation.

QlikView's pricing varies significantly, with high setup and user costs compared to Power BI and SAP Crystal Reports.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Board report

The license cost per user or per year for QlikView is about 500 Euros annually.

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Valuable Features

Board provides a comprehensive platform for customization, reporting, data analysis, security, and diverse functionalities with minimal IT involvement.

QlikView offers dynamic dashboards, self-service BI, and rapid data visualization with its Associative Query Logic and user-friendly interface.

Our budgeting and forecasting processes support around three hundred twenty users who would otherwise rely on Excel, making Board invaluable for saving time.

reviewer2645016

Manager, Software Delivery at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Board report

The best features in QlikView are rapid development, the fact that I can do what I want in QlikView, and full control along with ease of use.

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

For more quotes and insights, download the QlikView report

Categories and Ranking

Board

Ranking in Reporting

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (21st), Business Performance Management (8th)

QlikView

Ranking in Reporting

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

162

Ranking in other categories

Embedded BI (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of Board is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 3.5%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Reporting

Featured Reviews

Wiboon Thabsuwan

Senior Consultant at IMD Company Limited

Easy to use and requires less time to learn or understand its features

I think the product is good in terms of ease of use. The interface looks really nice and very easy to use. Every command appears in the icon. It looks like you don't have to understand everything about the command. You do not necessarily have to know more, or I would say that there is less time for our study about the products. Functionality-wise, it is quite easy to use and requires less time to understand or learn about the product. I am a software vendor, so I do not use the tool myself. I use it for my clients. My clients mostly use it for budgeting and timing purposes. I would say that's really less maintenance at all because they can do everything by themselves. It is good in terms of ease of use.

Read full review

Vishal_Goyal

Director Software Engineer at Clarivate

Provides ETL capability allowing the building of a complete data warehouse

I am working on Qlik Sense and previously worked on QlikView for data visualization and reporting purposes It provides a comprehensive data warehouse solution within Qlik Sense, eliminating dependency on external data sources and enhancing data visualization capabilities. QlikView is an…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user79932

Senior Manager - BI Head at NVidia

Feb 4, 2015

Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Is Board better than Anaplan as a Business Intelligence (BI) solution?

We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and simu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Board?

All the reports are prepared automatically.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Board?

Board's integration could be a bit more robust, but what we have works. If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance.

See all answers

What do you like most about QlikView?

If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?

Qlik Sense's licensing metrics are flexible. They provide packages based on needs, like named licenses, developer licenses, or shared pool licenses. There is also a core-based license option for or...

See all answers

What needs improvement with QlikView?

QlikView lacks self-service capabilities, which means users depend on the IT team to make changes. Qlik Sense offers a more modern approach with self-service features, allowing users to build dashb...

See all answers

Comparisons

Anaplan vs Board

Compared 30% of the time

Pigment vs Board

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Board

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs Board

Compared 9% of the time

Jedox vs Board

Compared 8% of the time

More Board Competitors

Tableau vs QlikView

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Cognos vs QlikView

Compared 6% of the time

MicroStrategy vs QlikView

Compared 5% of the time

More QlikView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Board

June 2025

Download Board product report

Buyer's Guide

QlikView

June 2025

Download QlikView product report

Overview

BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

Board International

QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB

Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. QlikView

June 2025

Free Report: Board vs. QlikView

Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. QlikView and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Board vs. QlikView report.

See our list of best Reporting vendors.

We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.