Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs OpenText Application Quality Management comparison

Broadcom and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Broadcom is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Broadcom holds a 3.8% mindshare in TMT, compared to OpenText’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Read 21 Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reviews
  • 1,155 Views
  • 693 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
OpenText Application Qualit...
Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews
  • 7,202 Views
  • 2,161 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer compete in enhancing software development processes. Broadcom offers better long-term ROI and extensive feature richness, making it favorable based on feature and value analysis.

Features: OpenText focuses on integrated test management, offering risk-based test planning and requirements traceability. Broadcom provides robust modeling, visualizing requirements, and workflow design. Its comprehensive features allow more effective development cycles and give it an edge in terms of feature richness.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance integration with automation tools, reduce initial deployment complexity, and offer a more intuitive user interface. Broadcom might benefit from streamlined model updates, enhanced reporting, and simplified testing workflows to further optimize usability and efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides straightforward deployment and solid support, ensuring smooth implementation. Broadcom supports an agile deployment model with versatile cloud and on-premises options, alongside premium customer support, which improves ease of use.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText requires a significant upfront investment with its testing capabilities justifying the cost. Broadcom, although potentially more expensive, delivers better long-term ROI due to its features reducing rework and improving handling of changes, making it appealing for organizational value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Application Quality Management Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer boosts efficiency, reduces costs and defects, accelerates delivery, and integrates seamlessly, improving ROI and productivity.
Sentiment score
6.6
OpenText Application Quality Management improves efficiency, collaboration, and project tracking, leading to substantial time and cost savings.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's support is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some experience delays and inconsistent expertise.
Sentiment score
6.2
OpenText Application Quality Management is praised for responsive support, though some users experience delays and varying service quality.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
Technical support has been excellent.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
Greg Stone
Partner at IS Nordic AS
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
Hosney Osman
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
reviewer1564011 - PeerSpot reviewer
GS
Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer excels in scalability, supporting projects efficiently with minor initial adjustments despite some Kubernetes concerns.
Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText Application Quality Management is adaptable, scalable, and flexible, handling large projects well despite minor licensing and performance issues.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is stable and reliable, with strong support and addressed issues, highly rated by users.
Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText Application Quality Management is stable and dependable, with minor issues often tied to network or hardware, not software.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
 

Room For Improvement

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer needs UI improvements, better integration, workflow simplification, enhanced security, and modernized graphics for efficiency.
OpenText Application Quality Management faces high costs, poor usability, limited integration, and requires better reporting and performance enhancements.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
Huong Vuong
Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
reviewer1477047
Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
Huong Vuong - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1477047 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1564011 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's pricing varies by team size, with enterprise agreements recommended for large groups to manage costs.
OpenText Application Quality Management is costly for users, prompting negotiations and exploration of alternatives like JIRA due to expenses.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
 

Valuable Features

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer enhances testing efficiency with automation, seamless integration, data management, and workflow optimization for engineers.
OpenText Application Quality Management excels in traceability, integration, customization, centralized management, and collaboration, enhancing project efficiency and scalability.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
Greg Stone
Partner at IS Nordic AS
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
reviewer1477047
Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
GS
reviewer1564011 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1477047 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Application Requirements Management (6th), Test Design Automation (4th)
OpenText Application Qualit...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
208
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (3rd), Quality Management Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is 3.8%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 8.2%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management8.2%
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer3.8%
Other88.0%
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
Hosney Osman
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone
Integration capabilities enhance testing and workflow automation
I rate Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer as 8 out of 10. It will be very nice if Broadcom has questions or comments related to my review and can reach me via email to clarify something. I want to be a reference for Broadcom. I don't have any information regarding the visual modeling function specifically. I'm not dealing with modeling requirements or generating optimized test cases in Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer. Broadcom takes a lot of information from us as end-users, and they provide fixes within two to five days maximum. My team has raised many enhancement requests and discussed them with Broadcom, and they are adding some of these features to the product itself. I look forward to receiving an email regarding these reviews, and I can add anything later if I forgot something, earning some points for this contribution on the website.
Read full review
Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
Hosney Osman
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone
Service provider recognizes effective project tracking and reporting capabilities
Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlenecks. As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Transportation Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Performing Arts
9%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise162
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
It's not affordable; it's very expensive. It would be suitable only for large customers, and a large customer will think twice before making a deal with Broadcom.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
Integration with AI is an area that needs to be improved quickly. To be clear, this relates to how to use AI to improve use cases, break down applications, and review designs, as this area needs to...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
This solution saves a lot of time in the software testing cycle because, with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer specifically, I am doing a flowchart, and I can extract test cases and use cases t...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 12% of the time
Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 9% of the time
Helix ALM vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Helix ALM vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 7% of the time
Inflectra SpiraTest vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Inflectra SpiraTest vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 7% of the time
IBM Engineering Test Management vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
IBM Engineering Test Management vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 6% of the time
More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Competitors
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 19% of the time
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 6% of the time
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 5% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 5% of the time
Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 4% of the time
More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
March 2026
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reportDownload Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Application Quality Management
March 2026
OpenText Application Quality Management reportDownload OpenText Application Quality Management product report
 

Also Known As

Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager
 

Overview

CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.
Broadcom

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?
  • Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
  • Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
  • Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
  • Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
  • Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
  • Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
  • Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Williams, Rabobank
Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
March 2026
Free Report: Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Application Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Application Quality Management report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.