Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs OpenText Application Quality Management comparison

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.0

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer boosts efficiency, reduces costs and defects, accelerates delivery, and integrates seamlessly, improving ROI and productivity.

Sentiment score

6.6

OpenText Application Quality Management improves efficiency, collaboration, and project tracking, leading to substantial time and cost savings.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report

It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.7

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's support is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some experience delays and inconsistent expertise.

Sentiment score

6.2

OpenText Application Quality Management is praised for responsive support, though some users experience delays and varying service quality.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report

Technical support has been excellent.

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Quality is always high yet not perfect.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

Partner at IS Nordic AS

I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.1

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer excels in scalability, supporting projects efficiently with minor initial adjustments despite some Kubernetes concerns.

Sentiment score

7.2

OpenText Application Quality Management is adaptable, scalable, and flexible, handling large projects well despite minor licensing and performance issues.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report

OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.5

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is stable and reliable, with strong support and addressed issues, highly rated by users.

Sentiment score

7.2

OpenText Application Quality Management is stable and dependable, with minor issues often tied to network or hardware, not software.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report

From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Room For Improvement

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer needs UI improvements, better integration, workflow simplification, enhanced security, and modernized graphics for efficiency.

OpenText Application Quality Management faces high costs, poor usability, limited integration, and requires better reporting and performance enhancements.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report

Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.

Huong Vuong

Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation

HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.

reviewer1477047

Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Setup Cost

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's pricing varies by team size, with enterprise agreements recommended for large groups to manage costs.

OpenText Application Quality Management is costly for users, prompting negotiations and exploration of alternatives like JIRA due to expenses.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report

It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Valuable Features

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer enhances testing efficiency with automation, seamless integration, data management, and workflow optimization for engineers.

OpenText Application Quality Management excels in traceability, integration, customization, centralized management, and collaboration, enhancing project efficiency and scalability.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report

It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.

Partner at IS Nordic AS

The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.

reviewer1477047

Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Agile Requirements...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Requirements Management (6th), Test Design Automation (4th)

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (4th), Quality Management Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is 3.5%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 9.0%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	9.0%
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer	3.5%
Other	87.5%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Integration capabilities enhance testing and workflow automation

I rate Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer as 8 out of 10. It will be very nice if Broadcom has questions or comments related to my review and can reach me via email to clarify something. I want to be a reference for Broadcom. I don't have any information regarding the visual modeling function specifically. I'm not dealing with modeling requirements or generating optimized test cases in Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer. Broadcom takes a lot of information from us as end-users, and they provide fixes within two to five days maximum. My team has raised many enhancement requests and discussed them with Broadcom, and they are adding some of these features to the product itself. I look forward to receiving an email regarding these reviews, and I can add anything later if I forgot something, earning some points for this contribution on the website.

Read full review

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

Partner at IS Nordic AS

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Retailer

Transportation Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	162

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?

It's not affordable; it's very expensive. It would be suitable only for large customers, and a large customer will think twice before making a deal with Broadcom.

What needs improvement with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?

Integration with AI is an area that needs to be improved quickly. To be clear, this relates to how to use AI to improve use cases, break down applications, and review designs, as this area needs to...

What is your primary use case for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?

This solution saves a lot of time in the software testing cycle because, with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer specifically, I am doing a flowchart, and I can extract test cases and use cases t...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 11% of the time

Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 8% of the time

TFS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 6% of the time

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 6% of the time

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Product Reports

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

January 2026

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report

Download Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer product report

OpenText Application Quality Management

January 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Also Known As

Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

Overview

CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.

Broadcom

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Williams, Rabobank

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)