Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
4.0 out of 5

What is Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?

Featured Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reviews

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer in the Test Design Automation category stands at 15.5%, down from 40.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Design Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer15.5%
ConformIQ Creator22.9%
OpenText Silk Central20.9%
Other40.7%
Test Design Automation

PeerResearch reports based on Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reviews

TypeTitleDate
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonBroadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs OpenText Silk CentralMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonBroadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs ConformIQ CreatorMar 26, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Jira4.1N/A91%280 interviewsAdd to research
IBM DOORS4.0N/A88%56 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise40
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Transportation Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Wholesaler/Distributor
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Marketing Services Firm
4%
Media Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Performing Arts
4%
Retailer
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
University
3%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
3%
Renewables & Environment Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Logistics Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Government
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Sports Company
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Construction Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
 
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone4.0I've used Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer for four years; it's stable, well-integrated, and saves time in testing, though it's expensive, hard to deploy manually, lacks scalability, and needs better AI integration and first-line support.
Senior Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees4.0I use Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer for DevOps, finding it beneficial for its ease of use, time-saving capabilities, and visibility of test cases. However, the UI could be enhanced with a modern framework for a better experience.
Senior Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available
Data Insights & Analytics Solution Architect at BT - British Telecom3.5No summary available
Senior Leader in Software Testing and Process Improvement at a tech company with 10,001+ employees4.5I found this solution excellent for multi-level test modeling, improving requirements alignment and test coverage. Its strong integration with TDM and automation reduced development cycles and issues, although model alignment and saving test subsets need improvement.
Test Engineer Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees3.0I use CA ARD for designing test cases and QC, valuing its unique flow restriction feature. However, I rate it 6/10 because it lacks integration with essential end-to-end automation tools like Tosca, which limits its overall effectiveness.
Assistant Director at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees4.0I use this solution for user stories and traceability, finding it stable, scalable, and productive, delivering good ROI. I wish its user interface were more friendly, particularly with icon-based attachments, despite valuable defect tracking.
Front Line Manager at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I find the product's optimization for minimum test cases and maximum coverage very valuable, and its visual diagrams are helpful. However, I need more data flexibility for multiple test sets and better, more automated integration with App Test to reduce manual effort.