Wireshark and Broadcom Network Flow Analysis are network monitoring tools compared for their capabilities. Wireshark's data analysis tools are robust, but Broadcom Network Flow Analysis leads in detailed network flow insights and reporting.
Features: Wireshark offers packet-level analysis, which provides detailed visibility into network traffic. Its deep packet inspection and customization options are valuable features. Broadcom Network Flow Analysis provides comprehensive flow-based monitoring and advanced metric reporting. It also offers broad network visibility and automated reporting.
Room for Improvement: Wireshark needs better handling of larger data sets and enhanced automated features. There are calls for it to improve scalability. Broadcom Network Flow Analysis requires a more intuitive setup process and better documentation. Enhancements in ease of use would also be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wireshark is simple to deploy according to most users and has excellent community support. Broadcom Network Flow Analysis, while offering extensive deployment options, has mixed reviews regarding support responsiveness and setup complexity.
Pricing and ROI: Wireshark is free, providing significant value with no initial setup costs and a high ROI, particularly for smaller budgets. Broadcom Network Flow Analysis, potentially more costly, offers a comprehensive toolset that can justify the investment through advanced capabilities and detailed reporting.
CA Network Flow Analysis provides 100% visibility into the composition of network traffic across the enterprise, helping Network Administrators deliver optimal application performance and validating the impact of network infrastructure changes, resulting in returns on investment (ROI) of up to 150%.
We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
