No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Payment Security vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
20th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is 2.8%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management2.8%
Broadcom Payment Security1.7%
Other95.5%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
RK
AML Compliance Analyst at HCLTech
Easy transaction monitoring but requires improvement in handling high user volumes
We can definitely improve the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool because I sometimes encounter issues while searching for particular customer transactions; it results in errors and I cannot easily find specific transactions. If there is improvement in those points, we can easily identify customer details and detect spikes in transactions to cover money laundering. Regarding specific features, I think AI should be implemented in the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool. AI should be integrated for better analysis and suggestions because nowadays, AI is very important for all organizations. If implemented, it can easily identify transaction details, reducing the need for extra manpower.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The CA solution is a world-class product and others should consider using this solution."
"I advise anyone that is looking for a payment security product to choose this solution."
"I think the performance from my organization's perspective is excellent in terms of minimizing the friction on genuine transactions with genuine customers, whilst optimizing the bad transactions, the fraudulent transactions that it stops."
"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"The technical support team is professional and attentive to our needs and concerns."
"So it's pretty useful operation wise, and also in terms of some inquiries from us, if a customer is disputing they didn't receive an OTP password on their online transaction, and then they're disputing that it's not theirs, and it's unauthorized, but it was a successful transaction, I use this product to see the customer's previous IP addresses."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."
"We see a high value in that, with all the fraud rules that we built, we have a very good false positive ratio because of the big data that CA has."
"The most valuable feature is automation which makes our transaction capture 40 percent easier."
"It has improved my organization because whenever there are transactions in high-risk countries that have a stricter set of rules, it alerts us to it, we can check to see if these are genuine transactions, and if it's suspicious we can see if we need to block or prevent those transactions."
"The solution user-friendly interactive, informative and it is also very light."
"The solution loads big data efficiently and quickly."
"The solution is easier to set up, configure, and use than other products."
"The case management tool is user friendly."
"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."
"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition, and it is able to process large amounts of data."
 

Cons

"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"That's the one complaint we have had is the lack of mobile signal."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"No solution is going to be 100% up, but in terms of what we've seen, we've been quite happy."
"We need more improvement in the Arcot console, which is used in monitoring 3DS transactions for example caching real time transactions rather than getting them after two or three hours."
"Sometimes when we move from one version to another, a few things don't work as expected."
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."
"Risk Control Monitor, RCM, needs improvement."
"Personally, I found the technical support to be a little slow. Sometimes this impacts our project timing which is also a problem for our end-users as well."
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions."
"I would like for it to proactively give suggestions or hints before initiating the transaction. It could make use of the data that has already occurred, like machine learning. It should learn patterns from specific countries."
"One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side."
"Could include additional customization"
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is an expensive product."
"We need a separate license for each of the packages, such as the core package, self-development package, and customization package."
"I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."
"It is reasonable for enterprise customers."
"I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
18%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
34%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Sports Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your primary use case for Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
I am working on Transaction Monitoring and Fraud Risk, and I have experience using the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool alongside World-Check and Salesforce for this purpose...
What needs improvement with Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
We can definitely improve the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool because I sometimes encounter issues while searching for particular customer transactions; it results in error...
What advice do you have for others considering Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
I have rated Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management a seven out of ten. AI should be integrated into the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool for better analysis an...
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
Actimize, NICE Actimize
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Associated Banc-Corp
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Payment Security vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.