No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Payment Security vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
20th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is 2.7%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management2.7%
Broadcom Payment Security1.7%
Other95.6%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Consultant Fraud Risk Management at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We are using the product for 3D Secure authentication and fraud prevention
For CA Risk Analytics, we would like to have some statistics available, to do some counting on the number of transactions for example. Also, to have the ability not only for 3D Secure, but accross all online channels. Online banking and App. Because then you would have three online channels. You would have the same device data, so you can combine it. So then you would have an online banking platform, an app, and 3D Secure all from one supplier. This supplier would support all of our authentication methods across those three channels. That's our ultimate goal to have one supplier to support all three online channels.
RK
AML Compliance Analyst at HCLTech
Easy transaction monitoring but requires improvement in handling high user volumes
We can definitely improve the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool because I sometimes encounter issues while searching for particular customer transactions; it results in errors and I cannot easily find specific transactions. If there is improvement in those points, we can easily identify customer details and detect spikes in transactions to cover money laundering. Regarding specific features, I think AI should be implemented in the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool. AI should be integrated for better analysis and suggestions because nowadays, AI is very important for all organizations. If implemented, it can easily identify transaction details, reducing the need for extra manpower.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and the management support, which is excellent."
"This is a good product, which is easy to deploy and has lot of user friendly features."
"I think stability-wise, we've not really had any issues in terms of stability."
"So it's pretty useful operation wise, and also in terms of some inquiries from us, if a customer is disputing they didn't receive an OTP password on their online transaction, and then they're disputing that it's not theirs, and it's unauthorized, but it was a successful transaction, I use this product to see the customer's previous IP addresses."
"I think the performance from my organization's perspective is excellent in terms of minimizing the friction on genuine transactions with genuine customers, whilst optimizing the bad transactions, the fraudulent transactions that it stops."
"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."
"We see a high value in that, with all the fraud rules that we built, we have a very good false positive ratio because of the big data that CA has."
"I like the tracking methodology. Though it was implemented on-premises, the compliance is compatible with it. It will have certain modifications with RPM and APR. It has good exposure from a compliance point of view."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The alerts are the most valuable feature because we have different alerts. Different data is fed to Actimize. It alerts us if a transaction happened from a certain place."
"The process and technology in the solution are very fast, and it is bug-free."
"We don't have problems with stability and scalability, and it is a definitely scalable product that from the user point of view has the scalability to handle an adequate workload."
"Previously there were processes in place but not completely automatic; with NICE Actimize those processes have now been completely automated and we now receive a comprehensive view of exactly what risks are involved with a particular scenario, providing a complete picture which helps in rational decision making quicker."
"The solution user-friendly interactive, informative and it is also very light."
"Actimize provides a safe solution that helps keep their reputation intact."
 

Cons

"There have been service outages/incidents and work has to be chased, for completion or comment."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"Unifying operational changes around highlighting. If you highlight one item, it will highlight the one card that's affected across the board."
"This is the one area where there's room for improvement. I think that is the one area where improvements can be made in terms of speed of response, in terms of quality of response, and in terms of more so a proactive problem monitoring."
"In the first two years, there were several issues with stability."
"At the moment, getting into that rich data is quite an effort."
"No solution is going to be 100% up, but in terms of what we've seen, we've been quite happy."
"We need more improvement in the Arcot console, which is used in monitoring 3DS transactions for example caching real time transactions rather than getting them after two or three hours."
"I would like for it to proactively give suggestions or hints before initiating the transaction. It could make use of the data that has already occurred, like machine learning. It should learn patterns from specific countries."
"Risk Control Monitor, RCM, needs improvement."
"Sometimes when we move from one version to another, a few things don't work as expected."
"Could include additional customization"
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily."
"One of the issues with the product is that when the front end is down, the processes don't work."
"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."
"I think this solution is unnecessarily complex."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."
"I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."
"It is reasonable for enterprise customers."
"We need a separate license for each of the packages, such as the core package, self-development package, and customization package."
"Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is an expensive product."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
16%
Construction Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
33%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Sports Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your primary use case for Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
I am working on Transaction Monitoring and Fraud Risk, and I have experience using the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool alongside World-Check and Salesforce for this purpose...
What needs improvement with Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
We can definitely improve the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool because I sometimes encounter issues while searching for particular customer transactions; it results in error...
What advice do you have for others considering Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management?
I have rated Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management a seven out of ten. AI should be integrated into the Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management tool for better analysis an...
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
Actimize, NICE Actimize
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Associated Banc-Corp
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Payment Security vs. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.