Broadcom StrataConnect vs Cisco Ethernet Switches comparison

"They have some of the fastest speeds available."

"The solution is compatible with many brands, such as VMware."

"The product is pretty much reliable and stable."

"Cisco Ethernet Switches are great devices."

"We only use the basic features and we find that it works well."

"Technical support is excellent. They are very helpful."

"The most valuable features of Cisco Ethernet Switches for our network are speed, latency, and reliability."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ability to manage the switches and the ability to have a certain level of familiarity with setting up and configuring the switches."

"I think the VMA architecture is valuable."

"Broadcom's biggest issue is that they don't like to share information."

"Cisco has a licensing procedure that is very complicated and it changes every six months."

"The platform's management features need improvement."

"It'll also help if it can support more network utilization."

"They need to offer free replacements until the end of life for devices."

"Cisco's pricing can be a concern, particularly with support fees."

"Its management should be improved."

"One area for improvement could be integrating a single dashboard for both wired and wireless networks."

"In the case of an already existing network, we encounter technical issues related to following protocols."

"It's approximately $1,000,000.00 if you want to get a license for the software."

"These switches are expensive, but they are an excellent buy and definitely have value for the investment."

"The pricing is reasonable so I rate it a six out of ten."

"I pay a fixed price on it. I'm not the person on the pursing, so I don't really compare."

"Cisco now has more products that are priced for small businesses, so they do have some cheaper models."

"Its price is very high, but it is a good device. Cisco must work on its price. Other solutions provide a better price for similar functionalities."

"The solution has different prices depending on the features that you want to have."

"Price is a pain point for us. We've lost a lot of bids, and the reason has been that we majorly quoted Cisco devices. Some of our competitors quoted other devices like Ubiquity or Microchip. Some even quoted this Chinese product TP-Link, and they won the bid over us because we quoted Cisco. Meanwhile, the major reason why we quoted Cisco is reliability and stability from day one. They also last longer. The prices could be worked on so that they become more affordable. We had to deploy a city-wide WiFi network, and we were working in conjunction with Google. Because of the price, even Google recommended a product called Ruckus, so we used Ruckus over Cisco. Its price and license were the main reasons. You have to pay to renew the license every year. Even though you also renew the licenses for Ruckus, but they are much cheaper than Cisco. So, while I would recommend Cisco any time, the trouble remains with the pricing."

"The price of this solution is good."