Cassandra vs Couchbase Enterprise comparison

Apache and Couchbase are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1, while Couchbase is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1. Apache holds a 8.0% mindshare in ND, compared to Couchbase’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Couchbase users who would recommend it.

Cassandra

Read 25 Cassandra reviews

2,135 Views
1,430 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Couchbase Enterprise

Read 18 Couchbase Enterprise reviews

1,789 Views
1,771 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cassandra

Couchbase Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Cassandra and Couchbase Enterprise compete in the large-scale data systems category. Couchbase Enterprise tends to have an upper hand due to its advanced features and multi-platform synchronization capabilities.

Features: Cassandra's features include a peer-to-peer architecture eliminating single points of failure, strong support for write-heavy workloads, and the ability to manage distributed data systems effectively. Couchbase Enterprise distinguishes itself with JSON document support, global secondary indexes, and a flexible data model that aligns with complex data requirements.

Room for Improvement: Cassandra may improve in areas such as ease of deployment, user interface simplicity, and out-of-the-box customer support. Couchbase Enterprise could enhance its cost-effectiveness, integration capabilities with legacy systems, and reduce the complexity of its configurations for newcomers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cassandra requires more extensive configuration but benefits from comprehensive documentation, suitable for organizations with strong technical expertise. Couchbase Enterprise offers a streamlined deployment process, professional services, and robust customer support, making it more accessible for companies needing comprehensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Cassandra presents a lower initial setup cost, appealing to businesses focused on cost-efficiency with significant technical infrastructures. Couchbase Enterprise, despite being more expensive, offers a higher ROI due to its advanced capabilities, catering to businesses in need of enhanced features and support for complex applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Cassandra vs. Couchbase Enterprise Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cassandra vs. Couchbase Enterprise

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cassandra

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (14th)

Couchbase Enterprise

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Cassandra is 8.0%, down from 12.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Couchbase Enterprise is 8.0%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Couchbase Enterprise	8.0%
Cassandra	8.0%
Other	84.0%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Monirul Islam Khan

Head, Data Integration & Management at a non-profit with 10,001+ employees

Has maintained secure document storage and efficient data distribution with peer-to-peer architecture

The functions or features in Cassandra that I have found most valuable are that it is a distributed system similar to Mongo. It's good enough for comparison with another SQL database, so it's smooth and organized for distributed database system. The peer-to-peer architecture in Cassandra is helpful for network decentralization, and I have already introduced that feature. Cassandra features in peer-to-peer as well as another monitoring, so basically, it's good enough for our service. The tunable consistency level in Cassandra is good, and we are using that feature already. In terms of built-in caching and lightweight transactions in Cassandra, the transaction level is good, and it's optimized, so there are no more issues in that database. Based on my experience, Cassandra is good for document management system, as well as distributed database system, and the automatic recovery process is there. Additionally, the database monitoring system or auditing system is well-comparable with other database systems, so we are actually happy to be using this Cassandra database.

Read full review

Benjamin Glatzeder

Chief Executive Officer at Lister Studios

Effortless synchronization and reliable performance streamline everyday operations

It just works. I used other products and they didn't do what Couchbase does. It works out of sight once everything is set up. When the user makes changes on their list in the app on their mobile phone, it syncs straight away. If there's an internet interruption, it resumes as soon as internet is available. I didn't have to do anything as a developer.It's great because it's very different from MySQL where you have to update tables. With document type databases, you just say there's a new element in your document, and that's fine. It's really good to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I would rate Cassandra as nine because of its fast writes, which really suit our use cases mostly."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."

"Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."

"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."

"Cassandra offers high availability and fault tolerance, making it suitable for large-scale data storage and real-time processing."

"We can add almost one million columns to the solution."

"The technical evaluation is very good."

"Our primary use case for the solution is testing."

More Cassandra pros

"Investing in Couchbase has significantly lowered our operational costs and increased throughput, reducing costs by half and supporting around five times the non-peak user volume during peak hours."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The valuable features of Couchbase are the many documents and index types, and they made a lot of features available enabling us to use it as a complete solution for our needs."

"I have found the views to be very valuable."

"It is pretty stable."

"The most valuable feature of Couchbase is document indexing. It is better than MongoDB. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."

"The main advantages were associated with it being a no SQL database. It helped us send out metrics or rewards to multiple players in our game at a very low latency."

"The whole stack is valuable, but the portion of the stack that we're finding really handy is the analytics engine because that allows us to take and pre-build views."

More Couchbase Enterprise pros

Cons

"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."

"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."

"I want Cassandra to update its open-source version more quickly. It's already feature-rich, but I'd appreciate better integration with other NoSQL databases like MariaDB or MongoDB. If I ever need to work with customers or vendors using different NoSQL databases, having native integration in Cassandra would make managing and interacting with their databases much easier."

"Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit."

"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."

"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."

"We experience configuration issues when accommodating the volumes we require, which often necessitates consultation with the Cassandra development team."

"We found some issues with the batch inserts when the data volume is large."

More Cassandra cons

"The platform's grouping features need improvement."

"We would like to have a better management of Kubernetes with the free, open source version of Couchbase. We don't have any major complaints other than that."

"The performance could be quicker and better, especially in the querying process."

"What is missing is that they have a new version, Couchbase Mobile three, but they haven't really updated or provided help or documentation about what needs to change to update to the latest mobile version."

"I would like Couchbase to provide more functionality via the UI, as some operations, such as time-based scaling, currently require using the API."

"The failover and failback could be a bit easier. When I looked at it last time, it had to be manually done. It also took over an hour for us to rebalance all the nodes."

"Although it worked pretty well, in some scenarios, we noticed issues where the replications and the sharding were not happening correctly."

"The scripting language for this solution could be improved. A big selling point is that they're like SQL server but there is still quite a lot of missing functionality."

More Couchbase Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have the specific numbers on pricing, but it was fairly priced."

"Cassandra is a free open source solution, but there is a commercial version available called DataStax Enterprise."

"There are licensing fees that must be paid, but I'm not sure if they are paid monthly or yearly."

"I use the tool's open-source version."

"We pay for a license."

"We are using the open-source version of Cassandra, the solution is free."

"It seems very reasonable. It's a lot cheaper than Redis, but we've got an enterprise license. So, it's about normal. It's not outrageous in price as far as we've seen. From Couchbase, there's no additional fee as far as I'm aware, but when you're integrating, there's an additional fee because a lot of times, they don't have an integration stack."

"The price of this solution is better than some of the other competitors."

"The licensing cost of Couchbase is quite expensive compared to other databases."

"I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing as it is affordable."

"It can range between 25,000 to 40,000 Euros per year depending on company requirements."

"We estimate that it's not very expensive, however, the pricing that you can get from the account managers, e.g. the public pricing, could be a bit expensive."

"I wouldn't say Couchbase offers good value for money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cassandra?

The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-ti...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cassandra?

The pricing for Cassandra is a little bit high, so it would be better for our community services if they consider community pricing for any non-profit organization like an NGO or other things. It w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cassandra?

Regarding areas of improvement for Cassandra, currently, we are not facing significant issues. Some issues arise from our vendors like Apache slowness and distribution or load balancing from HAProx...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Couchbase?

The main issue we keep facing from the past couple of years, observing other teams using Couchbase, is that whenever there is an upgrade, we see many issues with compatibility or nodes not intercon...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Couchbase?

Basically we have clusters, Couchbase clusters, databases, and that is how we use Couchbase with XDCR. All the clusters are set up and then we use Couchbase. It is a complex application setup we us...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Couchbase?

It is a good solution, but as every product needs improvement, this also needs some enhancement. It is a good product. I rate Couchbase seven out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Cassandra

Compared 12% of the time

ClickHouse vs Cassandra

Compared 12% of the time

InfluxDB vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

More Cassandra Competitors

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Redis vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 16% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

Google Cloud Firestore vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

More Couchbase Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cassandra

January 2026

Download Cassandra product report

Buyer's Guide

Couchbase Enterprise

January 2026

Download Couchbase Enterprise product report

Overview

Cassandra is a distributed and scalable database management system used for real-time data processing.

It is highly valued for its ability to handle large amounts of data, scalability, high availability, fault tolerance, and flexible data model.

It is commonly used in finance, e-commerce, and social media industries.

Apache

Couchbase Enterprise offers powerful data management capabilities with features like horizontal scalability, ease of use, and flexible tools for business applications. Designed for high performance and reliability, it supports multi-master capability and low latency, making it ideal for dynamic environments.

Designed for businesses needing crucial data management, Couchbase Enterprise offers advanced indexing, analytics engines, and efficient storage for performance enhancement. It provides flexibility with data types, robust data sync, and supports a dynamic API for seamless integration. Its intuitive query language simplifies operations, ensuring businesses navigate effortlessly while enjoying high availability and extensive features. Despite this, challenges exist in areas like manual failover processes, complex upgrades, and UI limitations, necessitating enhancements in concurrency, integration, and security features. Performance issues on certain platforms add to the need for improved documentation and support.

What are Couchbase Enterprise’s most important features?

Horizontal Scalability: Allows easy scaling across different servers to handle large data volumes.
Advanced Analytics Engine: Drives insightful business decisions by processing complex data rapidly.
Efficient Data Storage: Enhances system performance by optimizing data organization and retrieval.
Multi-Master Capability: Ensures data consistency and reliability across several nodes.
Dynamic API Integration: Facilitates seamless integration with other applications for extended functionality.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Performance Efficiency: Low latency capabilities ensure smooth operations for business applications.
High Availability: Robust infrastructure supports uninterrupted service and minimal downtime.
Data Flexibility: Supports diverse data types, enhancing adaptability to business needs.
Real-Time Data Replication: Ensures timely data updates across multiple platforms, enhancing workflow.
Reliable Customer Support: Provides technical assistance, improving user experience and system utilization.

Couchbase Enterprise is deployed across industries for its excellent data handling capabilities. It empowers telemedicine, e-commerce, gaming, and telecommunications sectors by offering efficient data link utilization, caching, and logging. Some companies leverage its real-time data replication with Elasticsearch for high-performance operational needs, while others benefit from its capabilities in managing reads and writes in iGaming. Retail industries use its document-based storage for structured inventory management, and cloud migrations are simplified with support from Capella.

Couchbase

Sample Customers

1. Apple 2. Netflix 3. Facebook 4. Instagram 5. Twitter 6. eBay 7. Spotify 8. Uber 9. Airbnb 10. Adobe 11. Cisco 12. IBM 13. Microsoft 14. Yahoo 15. Reddit 16. Pinterest 17. Salesforce 18. LinkedIn 19. Hulu 20. Airbnb 21. Walmart 22. Target 23. Sony 24. Intel 25. Cisco 26. HP 27. Oracle 28. SAP 29. GE 30. Siemens 31. Volkswagen 32. Toyota

Amadeus, Cisco, Comcast, LinkedIn, GE

Buyer's Guide

Cassandra vs. Couchbase Enterprise

December 2025

Free Report: Cassandra vs. Couchbase Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Cassandra vs. Couchbase Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cassandra vs. Couchbase Enterprise report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.