Cassandra vs PostgreSQL comparison

Read 127 PostgreSQL reviews

11,958 Views
4,664 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Cassandra

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

PostgreSQL and Cassandra both operate in the database management category. While PostgreSQL is suitable for structured data with its comprehensive features, Cassandra has the advantage in handling large-scale data quickly and reliably.

Features: PostgreSQL provides ACID compliance, geospatial support, and robust data types like JSONB, making it a versatile platform for various applications. On the other hand, Cassandra offers high availability and fault tolerance, ideal for distributed systems, and excels in managing large volumes of time-series data with exceptional speed.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL could improve its user-friendliness by enhancing installation tools and performance monitoring. It also needs better support for large-scale deployments and advanced analytics. Cassandra could benefit from improved handling of complex queries, particularly those involving JOIN operations, and integrating more user-friendly interfaces could broaden its usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL shows flexibility in hybrid, private cloud, and on-premises environments, supported by a robust community and third-party services. Cassandra also offers diverse deployment options, excelling in cloud environments. Both rely on community-driven assistance, but PostgreSQL's tighter integration with hosting platforms gives it a slight edge.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL is a cost-effective solution due to its open-source nature, offering significant savings compared to proprietary databases. Cassandra is available in a free edition, but enterprise-level features may incur additional costs if commercial support is needed through vendors like DataStax, which can be justifiable for large-scale demands.

To learn more, read our detailed Cassandra vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: April 2026).

Download the complete report

Cassandra vs. PostgreSQL

April 2026

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cassandra

Ranking in Vector Databases

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (6th)

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Vector Databases

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

127

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of Cassandra is 3.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 8.6%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vector Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PostgreSQL	8.6%
Cassandra	3.5%
Other	87.9%

Vector Databases

Featured Reviews

Monirul Islam Khan

Head, Data Integration & Management at a non-profit with 10,001+ employees

Has maintained secure document storage and efficient data distribution with peer-to-peer architecture

The functions or features in Cassandra that I have found most valuable are that it is a distributed system similar to Mongo. It's good enough for comparison with another SQL database, so it's smooth and organized for distributed database system. The peer-to-peer architecture in Cassandra is helpful for network decentralization, and I have already introduced that feature. Cassandra features in peer-to-peer as well as another monitoring, so basically, it's good enough for our service. The tunable consistency level in Cassandra is good, and we are using that feature already. In terms of built-in caching and lightweight transactions in Cassandra, the transaction level is good, and it's optimized, so there are no more issues in that database. Based on my experience, Cassandra is good for document management system, as well as distributed database system, and the automatic recovery process is there. Additionally, the database monitoring system or auditing system is well-comparable with other database systems, so we are actually happy to be using this Cassandra database.

Read full review

Shobhit Goel

Data Science Architect at publicis Sapient

High-volume transactions have reduced failures and improve customer service efficiency

The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL. I have also enabled the PG vector plugin on top of PostgreSQL. I have the opportunity to use two different features and two different flavors in a single product, which is the best thing about PostgreSQL. Initially, we had some hiccups around the performance part, but later we did indexing in PostgreSQL and now it is working very well. Even when we are doing 100,000 transactions in a day, PostgreSQL is working excellently. The interface is another best feature. If I need to do any query, I simply install the plugin on my local, which is pgAdmin. Through pgAdmin, I am able to communicate with PostgreSQL and execute all my SQL queries. I am getting a better UI with PostgreSQL as the backend, which is also one of the best options. PG vector is also very strong from PostgreSQL where I have implemented RAG and on a daily basis, I inject thousands of pages of PDF. More than 100 PDFs are coming into my system and one PDF is around 1,000 pages. We are injecting them into PostgreSQL and converting them into dimensions and inserting them into PG vector. The level of transactions we are doing on a daily basis is substantial, and we are getting very good throughput and low latency from PostgreSQL. When we were doing more than 50,000 transactions in a minute with the previous database, we were getting a lot of latency issues with threads getting blocked and abruptly closed unwantedly. After doing extensive research, we decided to move to PostgreSQL. Now, we are doing around 100,000 transactions in PostgreSQL and we are getting good throughput with no latency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cassandra is a stable solution."

"The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."

"The technical evaluation is very good."

"I am getting much better performance than relational databases."

"A consistent solution."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."

"I am satisfied with the performance."

"The solution's database capabilities are very good."

More Cassandra pros

"The tool is user-friendly."

"PostgreSQL is an amazing product."

"It is a superb database."

"What I like is that it's quite powerful in terms of performance."

"I think this is the only decent solution for a relational database in web development."

"I like that you can move any relational database from Oracle to PostgreSQL. I also like that it's pretty stable."

"The community support and the open-source community for it are good."

"Postgres is a superior product, and it is free."

Cons

"Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit."

"We experience configuration issues when accommodating the volumes we require, which often necessitates consultation with the Cassandra development team."

"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."

"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."

"While Cassandra can handle NoSQL, I think there should be more flexibility for whole schema design when data is stored in wide columns. Additionally, I believe that eventual consistency should be enhanced."

"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."

"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."

"The clustering needs to be better; it is getting there."

More Cassandra cons

"The installation is not simple, it is more difficult than DeviceSQL."

"We'd like to be able to start using JSON objects for easy code representation."

"The commands for PostgreSQL work, but are behind the curve compared to Microsoft SQL and MySQL."

"The user interface for the clients could be easier to use as they are small businesses. From a technical support perspective, the documentation could be improved."

"PostgreSQL could improve by adding data warehousing tools."

"There are several features I would like to improve that aren't working as expected. It's likely that the latest version is doing something that was missed in the previous versions. For example, the output parameters — the stored procedures — is something new in PostgreSQL that Firebird has already had for a long time."

"The user interface could be a bit better."

"Slow count. As the number of rows exceed a couple million, the count query and queries which get to the depth of the data (like FTS) start taking too much time even with all the right indexes in place."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have the specific numbers on pricing, but it was fairly priced."

"Cassandra is a free open source solution, but there is a commercial version available called DataStax Enterprise."

"We pay for a license."

"I use the tool's open-source version."

"There are licensing fees that must be paid, but I'm not sure if they are paid monthly or yearly."

"We are using the open-source version of Cassandra, the solution is free."

"The community version of Postgre is basically free."

"We use the open-source version of PostgreSQL and not the enterprise edition."

"We are using the free version of PostgreSQL."

"PostgreSQL is a free and open-source database."

"This solution can offer a cheaper choice for customers since it is open-source."

"It is also open-source so it is free."

"The licensing model is good."

"We do not pay for licensing."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	48

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cassandra?

The pricing for Cassandra is a little bit high, so it would be better for our community services if they consider community pricing for any non-profit organization like an NGO or other things. It w...

What needs improvement with Cassandra?

Regarding areas of improvement for Cassandra, currently, we are not facing significant issues. Some issues arise from our vendors like Apache slowness and distribution or load balancing from HAProx...

What is your primary use case for Cassandra?

My use case for Cassandra is for a document and other unstructured data management system as well as structured data for ultra-poor member community edition, community members' PII information, so ...

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

I purchased from the marketplace, so licensing and pricing cost is acceptable. To be honest, there is a separate team who handles the cost of licensing everything. I have admin access on Azure and ...

What needs improvement with PostgreSQL?

The only thing for PG vector is if the dimension limit could be increased. Currently, the dimension limit is around 1,000 to 1,052. If I need to increase the dimension to 3,000 or 5,000, that optio...

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Cassandra

Comparisons

ClickHouse vs Cassandra

Compared 8% of the time

Compared 8% of the time

DataStax Enterprise vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

More Cassandra Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 13% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 6% of the time

LanceDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Chroma vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

Download Cassandra product report

Cassandra

June 2026

Download PostgreSQL product report

June 2026

Overview

Cassandra is a distributed and scalable database management system used for real-time data processing.

It is highly valued for its ability to handle large amounts of data, scalability, high availability, fault tolerance, and flexible data model.

It is commonly used in finance, e-commerce, and social media industries.

Apache

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

1. Apple 2. Netflix 3. Facebook 4. Instagram 5. Twitter 6. eBay 7. Spotify 8. Uber 9. Airbnb 10. Adobe 11. Cisco 12. IBM 13. Microsoft 14. Yahoo 15. Reddit 16. Pinterest 17. Salesforce 18. LinkedIn 19. Hulu 20. Airbnb 21. Walmart 22. Target 23. Sony 24. Intel 25. Cisco 26. HP 27. Oracle 28. SAP 29. GE 30. Siemens 31. Volkswagen 32. Toyota

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg