Cassandra vs Qdrant comparison

Read 6 Qdrant reviews

4,230 Views
3,088 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cassandra

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Qdrant based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Vector Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cassandra vs. Qdrant Report (Updated: April 2026).

Download the complete report

Cassandra vs. Qdrant

April 2026

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cassandra

Ranking in Vector Databases

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (6th)

Qdrant

Ranking in Vector Databases

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (9th), AI Data Analysis (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of Cassandra is 3.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qdrant is 6.7%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vector Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qdrant	6.7%
Cassandra	3.5%
Other	89.8%

Vector Databases

Featured Reviews

Monirul Islam Khan

Head, Data Integration & Management at a non-profit with 10,001+ employees

Has maintained secure document storage and efficient data distribution with peer-to-peer architecture

The functions or features in Cassandra that I have found most valuable are that it is a distributed system similar to Mongo. It's good enough for comparison with another SQL database, so it's smooth and organized for distributed database system. The peer-to-peer architecture in Cassandra is helpful for network decentralization, and I have already introduced that feature. Cassandra features in peer-to-peer as well as another monitoring, so basically, it's good enough for our service. The tunable consistency level in Cassandra is good, and we are using that feature already. In terms of built-in caching and lightweight transactions in Cassandra, the transaction level is good, and it's optimized, so there are no more issues in that database. Based on my experience, Cassandra is good for document management system, as well as distributed database system, and the automatic recovery process is there. Additionally, the database monitoring system or auditing system is well-comparable with other database systems, so we are actually happy to be using this Cassandra database.

Read full review

Chirag Morajkar

Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees

Building accurate no-code resume screeners has saved weeks in document search workflows

I see room for improvement in Qdrant based on what another platform called Weaviate offers. Qdrant provides an excellent vector database with a solid searching method. However, it could elevate its offering by integrating embedding features. Currently, for the workflow automation I build, I rely on other platforms for embedding, so incorporating this feature directly in Qdrant Cloud would eliminate the need to depend on external solutions. A pain point I have encountered was the inactive expiration of the cloud created for certain projects. If the cloud is not used for a week, it gets terminated, which is frustrating. I think increasing that inactivity window in the free tier would be beneficial, as I have faced limitations due to this seven-day inactivity rule, requiring me to reset up the cloud after its termination.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-time updates is paramount."

"The most valuable features of Cassandra are its scaling capabilities and its non-SQL nature capabilities."

"The solution provided us with more than 100K PNRs a second and because the company was international there was a heavy data write, and at the same time a heavy data read."

"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."

"I am satisfied with the performance; so far it has done fairly well and there haven't been any complaints."

"We can add almost one million columns to the solution."

"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."

"Cassandra is good, it's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB, as Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."

More Cassandra pros

"Qdrant is an excellent vector database that anyone would want to use with RAG AI."

"An accuracy boost was definitely observed from 45 to 50% using Faiss to around 85 to 95% using Qdrant, and the users are really happy as they are getting suggested really good schemes that would take a lot of time to find."

"Qdrant has reduced our response time to less than one second for our 128 KB token sizes, and we are satisfied with that performance."

"Qdrant has positively impacted my organization by consuming much less time than building systems through coding."

"Using Qdrant's hybrid search capability has improved my search results."

"We saw a clear return on investment from Qdrant, particularly in the engineering time saved and the empowerment of team members to handle self-service tasks instead of reducing headcount."

Cons

"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."

"We have had stability issues including out of memory issues and crashes with earlier versions of the product."

"It can be difficult to analyze what's going on inside of the database relative to other databases. It can also be difficult to troubleshoot sometimes."

"Row-level locking is not available; might be very helpful in update use cases."

"Some issues arise from our vendors like Apache slowness and distribution or load balancing from HAProxy, which should better handle consumption for high-level concurrency."

"We experience configuration issues when accommodating the volumes we require, which often necessitates consultation with the Cassandra development team."

"The solution is limited to a linear performance."

"If you have a requirement of aggregation and joints, Cassandra doesn't support a solution that can give the aggregation."

More Cassandra cons

"A pain point I have encountered was the inactive expiration of the cloud created for certain projects; if the cloud is not used for a week, it gets terminated, which is frustrating."

"One of the key limitations is that Qdrant does not have built-in role-based access control, and while being self-hosted is a benefit, it can also be improved."

"The area for improvement in Qdrant is its clustering capability. While it has clustering functionality, it is not easy to set up, and not everyone can configure the clustering, so there is room for improvement in the clustering configuration."

"The file system lock in Qdrant prevents the API and scripts from hitting it directly, and to surpass this limitation, I have to run Qdrant client as a service, which incurs additional costs for running it continuously, so if something about that could be done, it would be really amazing."

"Architectural complexity was a key friction point, as our primary database was set in Supabase, necessitating synchronization of two separate systems for user data, permissions, and states."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are licensing fees that must be paid, but I'm not sure if they are paid monthly or yearly."

"I use the tool's open-source version."

"We pay for a license."

"Cassandra is a free open source solution, but there is a commercial version available called DataStax Enterprise."

"I don't have the specific numbers on pricing, but it was fairly priced."

"We are using the open-source version of Cassandra, the solution is free."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cassandra?

The pricing for Cassandra is a little bit high, so it would be better for our community services if they consider community pricing for any non-profit organization like an NGO or other things. It w...

What needs improvement with Cassandra?

Regarding areas of improvement for Cassandra, currently, we are not facing significant issues. Some issues arise from our vendors like Apache slowness and distribution or load balancing from HAProx...

What is your primary use case for Cassandra?

My use case for Cassandra is for a document and other unstructured data management system as well as structured data for ultra-poor member community edition, community members' PII information, so ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qdrant?

Licensing posed no issues, as Qdrant is open-source software with no upfront fees. Initially, the setup cost was low since we utilized a self-hosted model on a small cloud VM. However, as we added ...

What needs improvement with Qdrant?

While Qdrant is an exceptionally fast and efficient search engine within vector bases, our engineering team faced operational challenges during its adoption. Architectural complexity was a key fric...

What is your primary use case for Qdrant?

I have been using Qdrant for almost one and a half years. This was actually one of the first vector databases that we picked up in our organization. We started using the RAG modules to create a per...

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Cassandra

Comparisons

ClickHouse vs Cassandra

Compared 8% of the time

Compared 8% of the time

DataStax Enterprise vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

More Cassandra Competitors

Supabase Vector vs Qdrant

Compared 10% of the time

PostgreSQL vs Qdrant

Compared 9% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Qdrant

Compared 7% of the time

MySQL vs Qdrant

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Qdrant

Compared 7% of the time

More Qdrant Competitors

Product Reports

Download Cassandra product report

Cassandra

June 2026

Download Qdrant product report

June 2026

Overview

Cassandra is a distributed and scalable database management system used for real-time data processing.

It is highly valued for its ability to handle large amounts of data, scalability, high availability, fault tolerance, and flexible data model.

It is commonly used in finance, e-commerce, and social media industries.

Apache

Qdrant is a powerful tool for efficiently organizing and searching large volumes of data. It is particularly useful for tasks such as data indexing, similarity search, and recommendation systems.

With fast and accurate results, it is suitable for various applications including e-commerce, content management, and data analysis. Users appreciate Qdrant's efficient search capabilities, high performance, and ease of use.

Its quick and accurate retrieval of relevant information allows for easy navigation and analysis of large datasets.

The intuitive interface and straightforward setup process make it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise.

Sample Customers

1. Apple 2. Netflix 3. Facebook 4. Instagram 5. Twitter 6. eBay 7. Spotify 8. Uber 9. Airbnb 10. Adobe 11. Cisco 12. IBM 13. Microsoft 14. Yahoo 15. Reddit 16. Pinterest 17. Salesforce 18. LinkedIn 19. Hulu 20. Airbnb 21. Walmart 22. Target 23. Sony 24. Intel 25. Cisco 26. HP 27. Oracle 28. SAP 29. GE 30. Siemens 31. Volkswagen 32. Toyota

1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. BMW 5.Cisco 6. CocaCola 7. Dell 8. Disney 9. Google 10. HP 11. IBM 12. Intel 13. JPMorgan Chase 14. Kraft Heinz 15. L'Oreal 16. McDonalds 17. Merck 18. Microsoft 19. Nike20. Oracle 21. PG 22. PepsiCo 23. Procter and Gamble 24. Samsung 25. Shell 26. Sony 27. Toyota 28. Visa 29. Walmart 30. WeWork