CAST AI vs Cloudability comparison

CAST AI and Apptio are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. CAST AI is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0, while Apptio is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7. CAST AI holds a 1.8% mindshare in CCM, compared to Apptio’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CAST AI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Apptio users who would recommend it.

CAST AI

Read 1 CAST AI review

310 Views
310 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cloudability

Read 17 Cloudability reviews

1,765 Views
1,712 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

CAST AI

Cloudability

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CAST AI and Cloudability based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Apptio and others in Cloud Cost Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CAST AI

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

9.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cloudability

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of CAST AI is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cloudability is 7.1%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cloudability	7.1%
CAST AI	1.8%
Other	91.1%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

RahulArora

Global Head - DevOps and AIOps Startegist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Automation has optimized Kubernetes costs and right-sizing cuts manual cluster work

CAST AI helps us with automated node provisioning, workload right-sizing, intelligent auto-scaling, and overall cost visibility of the containerized systems that we have on the cloud. The best features CAST AI offers are the Kubernetes auto-scaling mechanism, continuous analysis of the pod-level CPU and memory usage, and ensuring that workload right-sizing is being done and our nodes are not over-provisioned. Identifying inaccuracies in the resource request is what we find quite useful with CAST AI. It definitely saves time and money as well, along with peace of mind because CAST AI continuously analyzes the pod-level CPU and memory usages. This helps us to optimize the request and the limits adjustments on our usage pattern, and overall, right-sizing improves the packing and reduces the wasted compute that we have in the cloud. In terms of overall impact on the organization, CAST AI has definitely helped us optimize our Kubernetes resources and given us automation capabilities. It is definitely helping us reduce the manpower and overall compute which is wasted. We can definitely save these using CAST AI. We will be notified upfront and proactively about any wastages that are happening, or any cost leakages that are happening in our system.

Read full review

reviewer2795433

Enterprise Cloud Operations Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Gained multi-cloud cost visibility and have optimized spend with detailed reports and rightsizing

The IAM feature is something that we struggle with using. IBM, the company that runs Cloudability, released the Groups feature back in the summer of 2025. While Groups can be used in some parts of the tool, it can't be used across the entire tool. I've found that Groups is basically unusable because if it can't be used everywhere, you would have to run both group-based access control and direct user-based access control at the same time, which doesn't make any sense. The Groups feature has improved over time, but it's still not something we feel we can use on an everyday basis, so the IAM section remains an issue right now. Most of the tool is very well-functioning and developed, and that's the only real improvement area that we've seen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We observed a 20 to 30% reduction in Kubernetes infrastructure cost, node utilization is improved, and we could see a 60 to 70% reduction in our manual cluster optimization efforts that we used to put initially."

"It provides us visibility, then we can turn around and can give the leadership team more information, which we could not previously give them."

"It has already given us insight into how to optimize. So, we are now ramping up steadily its usage."

"All the tagging and mapping, which helps to create some virtual tags are useful features."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to create reports and dashboards."

"The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Cloudability's integration with our existing cloud infrastructure, it's not integrated directly into our AWS infrastructure but rather reads and pulls data from it, providing valuable insights and analysis for cost management."

"The pricing isn't too expensive."

"The tool helps us to resize on AWS correctly."

"One of the standout features of the solution is its groups and views functionality. The solution is highly-stable. The solution is highly-scalable. The customer support is good. They can be easily contacted. The initial setup is straightforward. It's an excellent tool, especially when dealing with multiple clouds. It streamlines the process, eliminating the need to check each cloud individually."

More Cloudability pros

Cons

"The documentation of CAST AI can definitely be improved for first-time users."

"The API is not well-documented. It is not straightforward and difficult to use. This needs to be improved, as it is very difficult for our developers to develop automation around it."

"Enhancements could be made in the user interface and customization, and leveraging GenAI would be an area for improvement in Cloudability."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was adequate, but it could be made better."

"The IAM feature is something that we struggle with using."

"They can improve the custom range of the network."

"In general, I feel Cloudability wasn't able to support many resources."

"We would like them to have a linear regression, so we can be predictive for budgets, allocations, and the year's follow ups. We also want to have a longer window of analytics with better certainty that our workload will fit the model, not just in a two week window."

"I would improve the integration, or the preparation of the integration, for a complex environment."

More Cloudability cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of the license or the usage is a percentage of the top consumption. So it varies from year to year."

"It justifies the cost and is worth it."

"We have seen ROI with the reserved instances, and having the ability to predict what reserved instances you can get. We can save tens of thousands of dollars, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in some cases."

"Cloudability is a bit expensive."

"My team is one of the most expensive teams, and we look at it quite a bit. We have probably easily saved around $400,000 USD a year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CAST AI?

In terms of setup cost, licensing, and pricing, I find the experience good. It's enterprise-grade, and the pricing is usage-based with no heavy upfront setup cost, which makes the onboarding straig...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CAST AI?

The documentation of CAST AI can definitely be improved for first-time users. When we are onboarding a new user, the team needs some time to tune the policies and build confidence in automation bec...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CAST AI?

Our main use case for CAST AI is that we use it as a cloud provider and for Kubernetes clusters. We are using secure access roles and all those requirements for right-sizing the containers' workloa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cloudability?

The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Clouda...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudability?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was adequate, but it could be made better.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudability?

It would be beneficial if we could use resource tags to provide more fine-grained visibility.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs CAST AI

Compared 29% of the time

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs CAST AI

Compared 24% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs CAST AI

Compared 21% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CAST AI

Compared 14% of the time

More CAST AI Competitors

Apptio One vs Cloudability

Compared 19% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudability

Compared 8% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Cloudability

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs Cloudability

Compared 6% of the time

Harness vs Cloudability

Compared 6% of the time

More Cloudability Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

December 2025

Download CAST AI product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloudability

January 2026

Download Cloudability product report

Overview

CAST AI is revered for its powerful cloud optimization capabilities, notably in cost reduction, performance enhancement, and security strengthening. It automates resource management and scales operations efficiently, leading to significant organizational improvements in efficiency, cost savings, and smoother cloud integration and management.

CAST AI

Cloudability is a financial management tool for monitoring and analyzing every cloud expense across any organization. It brings transparency to how and where organizations spend money on cloud resources, giving them the power to reap the most value from cloud usage possible. It aggregates expenditures into accessible and comprehensive reports, helps identify new opportunities for reducing spend and increasing cloud efficiency, offers budget alerts and recommendations via SMS and email, provides APIs for connecting cloud billing and usage data to any business or financial system, and more.

Apptio

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Adobe, Uber, Pega, imgur, Pixable, Blackboard, Keboola, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Apptio and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.