Cequence Security vs OpenText Core Application Security comparison

Cequence Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cequence Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

25th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Bot Management (7th), API Security (7th)

OpenText Core Application S...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Cequence Security is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Application Security is 3.3%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Application Security	3.3%
Cequence Security	0.7%
Other	96.0%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Paulo Estevao

Lead Sales Engineer at e-Safer

Comprehensive API discovery has enabled us to block bots in real time and improve compliance reporting

Cequence Security can continue evaluating and evolving the machine learning and the AI that they have because attackers are using more AI, making it faster to learn how to attack APIs and business logic. When Cequence Security invests in their AI, they will provide quicker protection that our customers need, and the way that attackers think can be translated into security measures on Cequence Security workflows and baseline. They need to improve faster in the AI environment because the possibility of attackers is growing, which is something that must be improved continuously as we need quicker releases since the market demands it. Regarding accuracy and reliability, the AI has a baselining that allows it to learn from attacks, but it needs to improve more because in the Brazilian market, we have a creative environment for attackers who are familiar with the business logic of our customers, making it easier for them to imitate legitimate users during attacks. Thus, they need to enhance behavior analysis to differentiate themselves from all other products on the market. Latency can be a significant issue in bigger environments, especially since the architecture requires uninterrupted traffic to ensure customers can finish transactions. The defender component managing inline traffic holds all traffic and has mechanisms to control latency, allowing fallback during high-risk situations, but the sensor used for mirroring traffic is outdated and does not work properly.

Read full review

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

Supports secure development pipelines and improves issue detection but limits internal visibility and needs broader dashboard integration

If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much. That was the only reason we migrated from Fortify on Demand to another solution. Fortify has another tool which is Fortify WebInspect. On Demand is the outsourcing solution, and WebInspect you can use with your in-house team, which is basically the product developed by the Fortify team. For automated scanning, Fortify helps a lot. Regarding the visibility for the internal team, everyone is moving toward the DevSecOps side, and Fortify team has made good progress that you can integrate into your CICD pipeline. One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together. If you have one tool that works for different solutions, it helps a lot. They are doing good, but they should invest more on the AI side as well because AI security is evolving these days. On the cloud side, they have already made good progress, but I believe they should explore the new area related to AI security as well.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cequence Security has positively impacted our organization by giving us a lot of visibility from the market point of view since it competes with much bigger companies such as Akamai, Salt, and Imperva."

"It uses machine learning algorithms to detect attacks and manage API inventory."

"t's a cloud-based solution, so there was no installation involved."

"HP Fortify is perfect for any company that creates their own applications or uses vendor-developed ones; it’s great for QA and development phases."

"When choosing a software security product, we expect the product not only has the ability to find exploits, but also has educational and instructional capabilities related to exploits."

"Almost all the features are good. This solution has simplified designing and architecting for our solutions. We were early adopters of microservices. Their documentation is good. You don't need to put in much effort in setting it up and learning stuff from scratch and start using it. The learning curve is not too much."

"Once we have our project created with our application pipeline connected to the test scanning, it only takes two minutes. The report explaining what needs to be modified related to security and vulnerabilities in our code is very helpful. We are able to do static and dynamic code scanning."

"The most important feature of the product is to follow today's technology fast, updated rules and algorithms (of the product)."

"OpenText Core Application Security helps maintain compliance standards with a faster remediation cycle, as we know the vulnerabilities, and everybody knows that the developers can perform fixes more quickly."

"Fortify on Demand has helped us more easily ensure the security of our client's application, which works with sensitive information such as payments and taxation."

More OpenText Core Application Security pros

Cons

"It is expensive."

"Latency can be a significant issue in bigger environments, especially since the architecture requires uninterrupted traffic to ensure customers can finish transactions."

"With Rapid7 I utilized its reporting capabilities to deliver Client Reports within just a few minutes of checking the data. I believe that HP’s FoD Clients could sell more services to clients if HP put more effort into delivering visually pleasing reporting capabilities."

"Fortify on Demand could be improved with support in Russia."

"The thing that could be improved is reducing the cost of usage and including some of the most pricey features, such as dynamic analysis and that sort of functionality, which makes the difference between different types of tools."

"If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much."

"There are frequent complaints about false positives from Fortify. One day it may pass a scan with no issues, and the next day, without any code changes, it will report vulnerabilities such as password exposure."

"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand cannot be run from a Linux Agent. When we are coding the endpoint it will not work, we have to use Windows Agent. This is something they could improve."

"I would like the solution to add AI support."

".NET code scanning is still dependent on building the code base before running any scan. Also, it's dependent on an IDE such as Visual Studio."

More OpenText Core Application Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I believe the rental license is not too expensive, but it provides a lot of information about the vulnerabilities."

"We make an annual purchase of the licenses we need."

"We used the one-time application, Security Scan Dynamic. I believe the original fee was $8,000."

"The solution is expensive and the price could be reduced."

"We are still using the trial version at this point but I can already see from the trial version alone that it is a good product. For others, I would say that Fortify on Demand might look expensive at the beginning, but it is very powerful and so you shouldn't be put off by the price."

"The product's cost depends on the type of license."

"I'd rate it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount."

More OpenText Core Application Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cequence Security?

What is your primary use case for Cequence Security?

My main use case for Cequence Security is that my company is an integrator for Cequence Security, so we deliver this product to our customers in financial, banking, healthcare, and other sectors. A...

What advice do you have for others considering Cequence Security?

I can give Cequence Security a rating of 10 because this product genuinely makes a difference for our customers, and they do not need to lock in to Akamai does, which is significant for our custome...

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

Areas for improvement should be contextualized post the OpenText acquisition, but back when I was working with Micro Focus, they focused heavily on enterprise-centric solutions. Now, after the acqu...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

For OpenText Core Application Security, I currently support a couple of my clients who are using Fortify on Demand for their web application, CRM, and sales platform. Many good features of Fortify ...

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

I use Fortify on Demand for monitoring up to a certain extent; it provides monitoring and helps analyze and identify issues that could propagate in the application. When used in conjunction with Ar...

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Cequence Security

Comparisons

Compared 10% of the time

Akamai API Security vs Cequence Security

Compared 9% of the time

Salt Security vs Cequence Security

Compared 8% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Cequence Security

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Cequence Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Cequence Security Competitors

SonarQube vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 27% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 5% of the time

GitHub vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Core Application Security Competitors

Product Reports

Application Security Tools

Download Cequence Security product report

OpenText Core Application Security

Download OpenText Core Application Security product report

OpenText Core Application Security report

Also Known As

Cequence ASP, Cequence Unified API Protection Platform

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

Overview

Cequence Security protects applications and data in the agentic era. With over a decade of experience in bot defense and API security, it delivers immediate value in securing AI workflows, trusted by top organizations to safeguard billions of API interactions and user accounts.

Cequence Security provides a unified platform combining AI Gateway, Bot Management, and API Security to ensure comprehensive application protection. AI Gateway secures agentic AI interactions, enabling innovation with AI. Bot Management prevents automated attacks without additional agents or SDKs. API Security manages API posture, helping uncover risks, ensuring compliance, and identifying vulnerabilities. The Unified Application Protection platform integrates these services, providing seamless discovery, compliance, and protection against cyber threats.

What are the key features of Cequence Security?

AI Gateway: Secures agentic AI interactions with features like rate-limiting and least privilege access.
Bot Management: Comprehensive solution against automated attacks using network-based, agentless detection.
API Security: Monitors and tests APIs, assessing risks and ensuring compliance.
Unified Application Protection: Brings together discovery, compliance, and protection in one platform.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Immediate Value: Quickly delivers protection and insights into user and agent behavior.
Scalability: Handles billions of API interactions, ensuring performance and security at scale.
Comprehensive Protection: Defends against a wide range of cyber threats and vulnerabilities.
Ease of Implementation: No-code approach allows faster deployment and reduced technical debt.

In financial services, Cequence Security enables secure AI-driven innovations by protecting sensitive customer data and mitigating fraud risks. In retail, it safeguards transactions and user data from automated bots and unauthorized access, ensuring compliance and enhancing customer trust.

Cequence Security

OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.

OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.

What features define OpenText Core Application Security?

Static and Dynamic Scanning: Offers thorough analysis to identify vulnerabilities during development.
Real-time Vulnerability Tracking: Continuously updates and monitors potential security threats.
Seamless Development Platform Integration: Enhances security processes without disrupting workflows.
Cloud-Based Service: Provides flexible, on-demand security capabilities with accurate results.
API Support: Allows smooth integration and automation within existing systems.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Optimizes resources by lowering costs associated with security management.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the process of identifying and resolving vulnerabilities.
Enhanced Code Security: Strengthens overall application security during the development lifecycle.
Accelerated Time-to-Market: Streamlines development stages by integrating essential security tools.

Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.

OpenText

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Lbrands, Ulta Beauty

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

Cequence Security vs. OpenText Core Application Security