Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Forcepoint are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0, while Forcepoint is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 1.7% mindshare in DLP, compared to Forcepoint’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Forcepoint users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 24, 2026

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration are both key players in the cybersecurity domain, focusing on data loss prevention and email security, respectively. Forcepoint holds an advantage in data-centric security due to its robust data discovery and classification capabilities, while Check Point excels in email and collaboration security through its AI-driven threat protection.

Features: Forcepoint offers comprehensive data loss prevention across multiple channels, including endpoint and network protection, with strong data discovery and classification features. It is highly praised for its flexible policy creation and extensive template support. Check Point Harmony capitalizes on robust email and collaboration security, providing protection against phishing and spam through AI-driven tools and seamless integration with cloud services.

Room for Improvement: Forcepoint could streamline its complex interface and deployment process, improve its OCR capabilities for more languages, and enhance data classification to reduce false positives. It also needs better integration for multi-platform environments. Check Point Harmony could expand support beyond major platforms like Microsoft and Google, enhance reporting features, and improve integration with diverse email platforms. Addressing performance lag and increasing API flexibility could also enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint offers deployment options including on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud, though it may require significant resources and has a complex setup. Customer service varies by region, with occasional delays reported. Check Point Harmony, being predominantly cloud-based, is easier to deploy but lacks on-premises options. Customer service is generally responsive, though some regions report room for improvement in response times.

Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint's pricing is moderately high and comparable to competitors like Symantec, though users value its comprehensive coverage for ROI through improved data management and compliance. Its pricing flexibility could improve accessibility for smaller enterprises. Check Point Harmony is priced at a premium similar to FortiGate but justifiable due to its robust features, appealing to medium and large enterprises. ROI is reflected in enhanced security and efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 907,731 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) is 1.7%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is 4.7%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention	4.7%
Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration)	1.7%
Cloudflare One	2.0%
Other	91.6%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Harish (Kumar)

Cybersecurity And Information Governance Head at Aeren

Email security has blocked sophisticated phishing and now protects inboxes with AI detection

The only challenge with Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) is that it is an API-based solution. In an API-based solution, the major challenge is that it can read email content and Google Drive content. This presents a data privacy challenge, and we had to mitigate it by signing a Data Processing Agreement and other agreements. Because it is not a traditional in-line solution, Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) connects with Google Workspace using API permission and can access email, attachments, sender, recipient information, links, and all metadata is with Check Point. Data storage and everything else is with Check Point, which is the challenge. This solution has a drawback because of API deployment, while other solutions are traditional secure email gateways that are in-line solutions. In those solutions, we need to change the MX record, but with this solution we do not need to change the MX record, which is a pro of API-based deployment. However, there is also a con in that with API solutions, the email is scanned but after delivery in the mailbox.

Read full review

Madhukar Pandey

Senior Manager, Risk at LTFS

Quarantine workflows have shifted risk to business and provide strong PII protection across channels

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention can be improved because the options nowadays involve the use of AI. The approach of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is still very traditional, where I have to create the policy for each and everything. The AI component is missing in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, where based on user behavior analytics, it could give us suggestions. This type of improvement is needed in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention. Additionally, the hardware costing goes up when it comes to Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention because it requires large resources in the implementation part. Not regarding the user interface, but nowadays other DLP solutions have come up with the CASB part and the SaaS platform they are providing. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is still lagging there, and I have to rely on the on-premises setups. The management part has been difficult as I have to patch the servers, restart them, and regularly take backups. These are a few tedious things that I have to do while managing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention. This part also needs to be improved in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using Cloudflare One makes my work quite easy because for DDoS protection, all I need to do is understand the OSI model and click; it makes it easier than trying to write a command line or use a Linux command."

"Cloudflare Access is a stable solution."

"Cloudflare, in my opinion, was easy to implement."

"Enables me to work from two locations."

"It's the endpoint exposition. We don't need to expose our VPN server to the internet and need a zero-test solution. I can apply some conditional access to the endpoint that's connecting to our network to check their security policies or the security condition of their workstation. Once the workstation is trying to connect to my internal network, then I would like to check the discrete condition of these endpoints that are trying to access my internal network. We created some conditional access. We have CrowdStrike, to check if the CrowdStrike is installed, to check if it's updated, and to check for Windows updates. We created some conditional policies to check it."

"We mostly use Cloudflare WAF, and gets basic Cloudflaire DDoS, caching as extra bonus . We like the factor these features are all integrated into 1 console, simple to manage."

"The best feature is rate limiting. If I'm expecting 500 visits per hour, Cloudflare will limit the requests if I suddenly get 50,000."

"Cloudflare DDoS mitigates DDoS attacks."

More Cloudflare One pros

"In my opinion, it's one of the best products. It does protect other things like Slack and Salesforce, which are more about communication."

"For Threat Prevention, I was impressed with this feature and the solution's effectiveness. It has been very good."

"Check Point Harmony Email and Collaboration offers online support and has tight integration with Microsoft."

"Its characteristics are adapted to the most modern threats."

"The most valuable feature is spam detection and phishing site prevention, which Microsoft couldn't catch, yet Check Point does."

"The advanced phishing protection is proactive in catching threats before users even see them; it does not just block obvious spam, it can spot subtle impersonation attempts and suspicious links that appear legitimate at first glance."

"It fully protects colleagues from visiting insecure sites and browsing in unhealthy environments."

"For us, I prefer Check Point before Palo Alto and before other brands because Check Point is most effective in attack mitigation and attack detection."

More Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) pros

"Forcepoint is a pretty good product, we're all pleased with it."

"The solution is easy to manage."

"The ease of configuration was probably one of its biggest selling points."

"The most valuable feature is security."

"The scalability is fantastic. One of the things that I like about Forcepoint is that I can customize the solution to suit my objectives."

"Forcepoint DLP's most valuable feature is that it provides complete end-to-end security."

"One of the most valuable features is the set of built-in policies that Forcepoint has for PCI compliance. We just need to activate them and start working. Without them, it would be a big task to do a data transformation."

"Another valuable feature is that it provides integration to things like Cloud Access Security Broker, which provides security around cloud applications."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"Feedback could be enhanced. While I work efficiently with Clover as a partner in Mexico City, sometimes the information and requests are easier to manage with more concrete solutions."

"The tool should provide on-premise versions. Currently, all versions are cloud-based."

"The onboarding process can be improved a little bit."

"Cloudflare DDoS has poor technical support."

"Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar."

"For the topic of improvement, providing some training material is one of my suggestions."

"When there are any dynamic changes in complex applications, the tool takes a lot of time, making its analytics-related area a major matter of concern where improvements are needed."

"There are premium tier live service and lower tier live service, so we opted for the lower tier. But there is no medium tier where we pay a little extra and get a bit more service. So if that can be improved."

More Cloudflare One cons

"The reporting could be improved."

"Initial Learning Mode takes a while."

"I would like Check Point to extend its coverage to include more cloud applications."

"Other vendor support teams go after fixing the issue the moment that they join the remote session. The problem that I have faced with Check Point support is that they share the case number with me, then it takes at least two days for them to join a remote session with us, even though we have asked for this timeframe to change. Even though we have already explained the problems that we are facing or the business pain points in our network on the call or email, we have to repeat the problem statements again in the console. It can take four or five days to resolve the issue from the moment they understand the problem. This includes the time to teach their R&D or internal team whatever the issue is. I have faced timeframes as long as seven to 10 days for fixing some issues."

"We are unable to export the reports from the dashboard, and if it is possible to do then it is not intuitive."

"During the East Coast server outage with Amazon service this week, mail was delivered and then pulled back because Harmony wasn't working properly and needed to scan it."

"Maybe Check Point can work on the DLP part."

"if a phishing email were to get through and bypass the product — which very few do — it would be nice if, when a user clicked on that phishing email, they got a second-chance opportunity, a chance to double-check that they really wanted to proceed to that website."

More Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) cons

"In terms of display, the support and the Mac platform requires a lot of improvement."

"Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention can be improved because the options nowadays involve the use of AI. The approach of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is still very traditional, where I have to create the policy for each and everything."

"The user-friendliness of the interface in formulating DLP policies could be improved."

"The deployment can be difficult."

"Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention's licensing in Indonesia has experienced delays."

"The solution lacks sufficient customization."

"I am not able to get support directly from Forcepoint."

"Usually for the biome of a small company, like 50 users, setup takes more than one week."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"The pricing and licensing are always negotiable."

"The difference between [Check Point and its competitors] boiled down to money. Price-wise, Check Point was very good, it was very competitive."

"One of the nice features is that the licensing model is elastic, so if you go over your license count, you can add users during your billing cycle and true-up later."

"Due to its pricing, I would say that Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is more suitable for medium to enterprise organizations."

"This is a very good product if you are on the cloud, but the price is a little more expensive."

"I rate the product's pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Reasonable cost, quick and easy implementation, and transparent."

"I'm in this business as a system integrator, so I need to suggest Check Point to some customers who are comparing products. I sell Check Point, Fortinet, and Palo Alto solutions. In terms of licensing, this solution is quite competitive but very costly. For someone looking at security as a primary concern, they should only invest in Check Point. For a customer who is looking at security combined with pricing, Check Point might not be the core solution for them. In today's market, customers are looking for effective security with efficient pricing, and Check Point is not suitable for these types of customers."

More Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"Forcepoint offers a more cost-effective solution because everything, including OCR, is included in one package, unlike Symantec, where it is an add-on with an additional cost."

"I prefer Forceoint because it is cheaper than Symantec."

"The pricing and licensing fees could be improved."

"Forcepoint DLP is a bit expensive."

"The licensing of Forcepoint is quite straightforward. It's based on the number of users. The support fees are a separate cost."

"It's not the cheapest solution but it's not the most expensive. It's a good price for a good product."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

907,731 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	72
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	37

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Pricing is competitive. Akamai is more expensive, in my view.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

In my opinion, Cloudflare One can be improved mainly through compatibility, as the integration should be much simpler...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Cloudflare One's primary use case for my organization is to protect servers and to provide remote access with the VPN...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Email & Office?

We are not currently using this product. Six months back, we removed that product due to a few issues. The major issu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point Harmony Email & Office?

The major use case for Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) was Business Email Com...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Harmony Email & Office?

The only challenge with Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) is that it is an API-...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

Need to bare server cost if you are going for on prem setup. License cost is negotiable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention can be improved because the options nowadays involve the use of AI. The approach of F...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

My main use case for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is that I have used it for all three channels: the endpoint, web...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Mimecast Advanced Email Security vs Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration)

Compared 12% of the time

Barracuda Email Protection vs Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration)

Compared 9% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration)

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration)

Compared 5% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration)

Compared 2% of the time

More Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) Competitors

Cyera vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Cyberhaven vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

July 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration)

July 2026

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) report

Download Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) product report

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

July 2026

Download Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Check Point CloudGuard, Check Point CloudGuard SaaS , Check Point Harmony Email & Office

Forcepoint DLP, Forcepoint Data Security Suite, Websense Data Security Suite

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration provides AI-powered security features for email and collaboration platforms, integrating with Microsoft 365 for comprehensive protection against phishing and malware threats.

Designed for seamless deployment, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration offers advanced protection with minimal false positives. Users benefit from real-time alerts, granular threat analysis, and intuitive operation. It supports API-based email security, ensuring safe communication channels and data protection. While it integrates smoothly with Microsoft 365, improvements in dashboard usability, stability, false positive reduction, and expanded integrations with non-Microsoft platforms can enhance the experience.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration?

AI-Powered Threat Intelligence: Utilizes machine learning to detect and prevent emerging threats.
Seamless Office 365 Integration: Offers easy deployment and integration with Microsoft's suite.
Zero-Day Attack Prevention: Protects against unknown vulnerabilities with advanced sandboxing.
Robust Phishing Protection: Employs comprehensive techniques to block phishing attempts.
Advanced Sandboxing: Analyzes potential threats in a controlled environment to prevent breaches.
Comprehensive Dashboards: Provides insights with real-time threat monitoring and analysis.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Ease of Deployment: Simple setup process with minimal disruption to operations.
Cost-Effective Security: Reduces potential breach costs with proactive threat prevention.
Reduced False Positives: Minimizes unnecessary alerts, allowing teams to focus on real threats.
Enhanced Threat Visibility: Real-time analytics offer deeper understanding of security landscape.

In finance, healthcare, and education industries, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is deployed to safeguard sensitive information and ensure unrestricted communication flow. These sectors value its ability to block suspicious emails, prevent data loss, and maintain compliance with industry regulations.

Check Point Software Technologies

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policies and centralized visibility to simplify compliance and prevent data breaches in real time.

With over 1,800 pre-defined templates, policies, and classifiers covering the regulatory requirements of 90+ countries and 160+ regions, Forcepoint DLP accelerates deployment and ensures precise protection of regulated and sensitive data.

Flexible deployment options let organizations protect data on-premises, in the cloud, or through a hybrid approach using the same unified console. Powered by AI-driven classification and Risk-Adaptive Protection (RAP), Forcepoint DLP reduces complexity, automates compliance, and safeguards data wherever work happens.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is equipped with advanced fingerprinting technology, optical character recognition, and a large library of predefined rules. Organizations gain comprehensive data visibility and effective policy enforcement, supported by dynamic user behavior analysis and compliance capabilities. Its intuitive interface and flexible deployment options position it as a top choice for data security, although it could improve in communication reliability and language support. Complex reporting, machine learning integration, and cross-platform compatibility require enhancements.

What are the key features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

Ease of Installation: Simplifies setup for quick deployment.
Extensive Templates: Provides a wide range of compliance templates.
Powerful Fingerprinting: Offers robust data protection through precise identification.
Detailed Reporting: Generates comprehensive data movement reports.
Customizable Rules: Allows tailored data protection policies.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly connects to cloud environments.
Optical Character Recognition (OCR): Reads text in images for data security.
Risk Analysis: Assesses risks to enhance data protection strategies.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from reviews?

Data Protection: Safeguards sensitive information effectively.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps meet legal requirements like PCI.
Data Visibility: Provides clear insights into data movement.
Integrated Security: Works smoothly with existing security tools.
Behavior Analysis: Offers insights into end-user actions.

In industries like finance, legal, and healthcare, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is implemented to protect sensitive data such as credit card information and personal identification. It monitors and controls data on networks, endpoints, and cloud services, detecting unauthorized transfers through features like OCR and fingerprinting.

Forcepoint

Sample Customers

23andMe

Helvetia, Denham Capital, Daymark Solutions, Neopharm Group

Alphawest, Betsson, Cellcom Israel Ltd., Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, Confartigianato Vicenza, EverBank, Finansbank, iGATE, Landa Digital Printing, Northern California Bank, Reliance Capital, Remosa, Toyota, Scavolini, Zim Integrated Shipping Services

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

June 2026

Free Report: Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

907,731 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.