

Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Protecting around 2,000 users from cyber threats, including ransomware, has positively impacted the organization's growth by reducing disruptions and business loss.
We have seen a good return on investment since implementing Check Point SandBlast Network, as we are spending less time on forensics and it is also preventing us from potential breaches, which itself justifies the cost.
I have seen a return on investment since using Check Point SandBlast Network, as it has improved the efficiency of incident handling and saved costs.
We see a return on investment as MetaDefender prevents malware incidents, saves investigation time for SOC analysts, and reduces the overall impact of threats.
Having both cloud and on-premise solutions enables effective file sanitization and vulnerability detection while preventing attacks that save costs and protect reputation.
MetaDefender has positively impacted my organization by reducing the risk of file-based attacks, which has significantly improved our overall defense against phishing and malware delivery techniques.
The customer support for Check Point SandBlast Network is great, as the security team has extensive knowledge and provides proper solutions.
I did get the best from Check Point SandBlast Network's support team; they were very helpful while troubleshooting any kind of issues we faced.
The customer support on chat is pretty much available and relevant to solve the problems.
This can save time because many vendors, when they check something and ask for logs, need those logs from the beginning.
Their customer service team, distribution team, and regional sales managers provide excellent aftercare and set us up for upselling across the entire MetaDefender portfolio.
The technical support can be rated at 9.5 from one to 10, with 10 being the best.
The scalability of Check Point SandBlast Network meets our organization's needs as we grow.
The scalability of Check Point SandBlast Network is very nice.
It is scalable but requires growing the box itself because it is a resource-intensive solution.
When you use one database for all instances, you can deploy ten different servers or ten different instances with a separate database for each one.
We handle vast amounts of traffic from banking, defense, and critical national infrastructure.
MetaDefender's scalability is excellent, as it handles larger volumes of file scanning without major issues.
When configured correctly with adequate resources, it functions properly.
In my experience, Check Point SandBlast Network is stable and I have not encountered any downtime or reliability issues.
Check Point SandBlast Network is stable in my experience, providing proper security to our organization.
The stability of the system is very high.
MetaDefender is 100% stable, making it one of the best cybersecurity solutions we offer.
I find it stable as it maintains good external stability with good availability and no major issues.
Simplification of granular tuning for false positive reduction and bypassing benign files would benefit non-expert users.
The customer support for Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved as they are sometimes late with their responses.
Check Point SandBlast Network can be improved by adding more integration capabilities, such as integration with third-party firewalls, third-party EDR solutions, and SIEM.
They should consider integrating live threat intelligence data.
MetaDefender should have a wizard or general policies that can be used for 80 percent of customers.
Pricing is an important aspect in catering to customer budgets and is a must-have consideration for organizations.
My experience with pricing and setup cost is that pricing was a bit high.
Pricing is a bit costly, but considering the features and security offered by Check Point SandBlast Network, it is reasonable.
When someone attempted to buy from us one instance of OPSWAT, it was about nine thousand dollars for multi-scanning with eight engines and also the CDR module.
For those considering multi-layer security, it is worth it for enterprises.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I find the pricing for kiosks, cloud, deep CDR, and adaptive sandbox appropriate.
The key features of Check Point SandBlast Network include its ability to detect zero-day attacks, provide sandboxing capabilities, and offer real-time protection with threat extraction.
Check Point SandBlast Network has positively impacted my organization as it's very accurate and gives almost no false positives, providing excellent threat prevention and protecting against server zero-day attacks.
It detects zero-day exploits in suspicious and normal files, and includes forensic and reporting features that provide detailed incident analysis, malware behavior reports, and indicators of compromise.
I believe this is very effective and is the most effective engine of OPSWAT because customers ask for OPSWAT for two main reasons: the CDR capabilities and the multi-scanning engines.
MetaDefender's core philosophy of trusting no file means it scans files, rebuilds them, and verifies their reputation, ensuring they contain no malicious content.
The integration of multi-scanning and Content Disarm and Reconstruction is truly helpful because we can utilize it in other products such as email integration with ICAP capability, and we are also using it in web scanning.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point SandBlast Network | 3.5% |
| MetaDefender | 1.6% |
| Other | 94.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Check Point SandBlast Network is trusted for advanced threat prevention, employing real-time threat detection and AI-powered analysis to secure corporate environments from zero-day attacks and file-based exploits.
Focused on comprehensive security, SandBlast Network integrates seamlessly with smart security tools to deliver proactive threat prevention. The network leverages sandboxing for zero-day threats, sanitizes email attachments, and frequently updates threat signatures. Threat Emulation and Extraction are key, preventing malicious file downloads and minimizing disruptions while retaining originals for in-depth analysis. Effective at securing emails and web downloads, it offers robust protection against phishing and ransomware.
What are Check Point SandBlast Network's standout features?Check Point SandBlast Network is widely implemented in industries needing advanced threat prevention, such as financial, healthcare, and governmental sectors. These industries utilize its robust features to safeguard sensitive data, protect against sophisticated cyber threats, and ensure a secure digital environment for their operations.
MetaDefender provides advanced multiscanning capabilities using 30+ anti-malware engines, ensuring high detection efficacy and robust prevention mechanisms.
MetaDefender's approach combines multiple security technologies like Metascan, Deep CDR, and adaptive sandboxing. These integrated solutions offer comprehensive protection against malware and vulnerabilities, catering to cloud, on-prem, and hybrid environments with enhanced performance and automation.
What are the key features of MetaDefender?
What benefits and ROI can MetaDefender offer?
MetaDefender is trusted in industries such as financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and government, where rigorous policy control and auditability are vital. Its diverse deployment options allow for consistent security across datacenters, OT networks, and secure facilities, meeting stringent compliance needs.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.