Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point SandBlast Network vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and SonicWall are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while SonicWall is ranked #27. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 3.4% mindshare in ATP, compared to SonicWall’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.
Check Point SandBlast Network
Read 44 Check Point SandBlast Network reviews
  • 1,867 Views
  • 1,755 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
SonicWall Capture Advanced ...
Read 8 SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection reviews
  • 646 Views
  • 620 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection and Check Point SandBlast Network compete in cybersecurity solutions aimed at defending against advanced threats. Check Point SandBlast Network holds an advantage due to its comprehensive feature set, while SonicWall excels in pricing and customer support.

Features: SonicWall Capture provides real-time threat detection, automated remediation, and solid performance. It facilitates easy integration and network traffic optimization for specific applications. Check Point SandBlast Network offers advanced threat emulation and extraction, preventing zero-day threats effectively. It includes threat extraction from documents and a sandbox environment for file evaluation.

Room for Improvement: SonicWall Capture could enhance its advanced threat management capabilities and offer more detailed configuration options. Check Point SandBlast Network might improve by making its setup simpler and optimizing its initial investment cost. Both solutions can focus on user experience and intuitive interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Capture is recognized for simple deployment and responsive support, making it attractive for users valuing ease of use. Check Point SandBlast Network requires more detailed configuration but is supported by robust technical assistance. SonicWall's emphasis on user-friendly implementation and service gives it an edge.

Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Capture is a budget-friendly option with attractive ROI for cost-conscious buyers, presenting a cost-effective setup. Check Point SandBlast Network incurs higher upfront costs but justifies this with comprehensive security features and significant long-term returns. For many, SonicWall provides an economical choice initially, whereas Check Point offers greater value over time through advanced protection.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point SandBlast Network vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point SandBlast Network
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SonicWall Capture Advanced ...
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
27th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Check Point SandBlast Network is 3.4%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Check Point SandBlast Network3.4%
SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection2.0%
Other94.6%
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

MW
Mayur Wadekar
Technical Specialist at Softcell Technologies Limited
Comprehensive security solution mitigates advanced threats
Improvements for Check Point SandBlast Network can be seen in dashboard usability; the threat emulation logs and analysis reports could be made more intuitive and visually appealing. Enhancing the system for granular tuning to reduce false positives and allowing benign files to bypass checks more simply for non-expert users would be beneficial. Additionally, faster emulation times could be achieved by increasing file scanning speed through hardware productivity enhancements. A specific instance where file scanning speed posed an issue was when the time taken depended on the file size. Scanning can take less than a minute or up to 2 minutes for larger files. Enhancing the file scanning time would be a significant improvement to the system.
Read full review
MA
MohammadAta
Technical Manager, NOC at TEXUM JORDAN
Has a good configuration but the price should be more competitive
Our primary use case of this solution is for security.  It's a good solution but the price is high. It also has an easy configuration. The feedback that we get from our customers is that it's a good product. Our customers are mostly smaller enterprises.  The price should be more competitive.  I…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The sandbox is able to scan files without adding a delay or compromising productivity."
"The product gives us advanced protection, including artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies and services."
"Preventing zero-day threats and extracting potential threats from incoming files with Threat Extraction is the most valuable feature for us."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point SandBlast Network is the sandboxing of PDF and Microsoft system files."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable thing about this product is that it keeps the network secure against zero-day threats."
"The best feature Check Point SandBlast Network offers is real-time threat extraction capabilities, which sanitizes the files, mails, and other content before reaching the end-users."
"The technology is impressive in general."
More Check Point SandBlast Network pros
"The ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) on scanning is the most valuable feature."
"It also has an easy configuration. The feedback that we get from our customers is that it's a good product."
"Provides good protection and security."
"The reporting that you get from it is the most valuable feature. You can see it via the appliance itself, and also via the MySonicWall account for the registered device. You are able to select the file if it's malicious, and you can select it in the reporting and see what triggered it, and things like that. I found that to be quite useful."
"We use it for protection against viruses and ransomware attacks."
"They have a large database of commonly known things that they can catch automatically, then they have anything which is questionable go to the sandbox and be examined there before going into our network."
"We get alert messages whenever there is a new threat. We are notified at the firewall level that things are blocked, which keeps us in our comfort zone."
"I like this setup for a firewall. You can set things up very easily and you can automate items as well. It's a very robust firewall solution for enterprise as well as small businesses."
More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection pros
 

Cons

"Most of the time stability is okay, but sometimes, we're not able to contact the cloud. It won't last for long. The product could be faster."
"Today, we have it as part of a solution or a package. However, we'd like there to be a way where we can have the solution's features available to us in a cheaper way in the future."
"The knowledge base of Check Point SandBlast Network contains some confusing context, which might be confusing while configuring and designing."
"The response times were slower, and getting support personnel on the call was more difficult."
"I think Check Point provides standard time which ideally most other vendors take to identify behaviors of a file by sending them into a sandbox environment for inspection."
"Using it in the beginning was difficult because I had never used anything similar. In terms of navigating the UI, it was all not too bad, but there is definitely a learning curve."
"SandBlast takes longer than FortiSandbox to complete a scan."
"There is a limit on the number of files that can be scanned in real-time, which could lead to us being found with our guard down on a high-traffic day."
More Check Point SandBlast Network cons
"Could provide online training to allow customers to learn more about the product."
"I would say the solution needs a much simpler user interface, but the functionality of the firewall is quite extensive. You need the user interface to be that way. However, if there was a way to make the user interface a little easier, that would be great."
"If anything at all, it would be some very minor updates that need to be done, but in terms of changes, nothing comes to mind."
"Having an on-premise solution as well would be an option for some people, but they'll want to use a cloud solution for their sandboxing. Certain sites would want to keep all the checks done on an on-premise appliance. All the checking, rather than sending that up into a cloud engine."
"SonicWall should promote their roadmap and improve their marketing to customers."
"The setup needs improvement. It needs to be made more user-friendly."
"It does fare well against enterprise products."
"I would like to have better documentation before starting with deployment because the deployment is a bit complex."
More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Check Point SandBlast Network is annually, and there is only a standard license."
"We have seen ROI."
"The product's cost is high."
"The pricing is quite effective, not excessively high. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing a nine."
"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."
"The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."
"We would like to try the Threat Extraction blade, but you need to buy a license. Check Point is expensive. I would like to buy things, but I would need the funding."
"I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market."
"When you compare it with other solutions, they are cheaper and more economical."
"It's thirty dollars per user and we have 30 users."
"We get our value for our money."
"The best deal from SonicWall is to buy the HA pair. When you buy the initial one, you receive the second one at a significant discount. If there is an event and something happens to one firewall, then you have the second firewall to roll into. For the price, it's pretty to tough to beat and not a lot of other firewall vendors offer it. You battle for a discount on both. Where with SonicWall, if you buy one, the second one is at half price. It's pretty straightforward."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Marketing Services Firm
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business31
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point SandBlast Network?
My experience with pricing and setup cost is that pricing was a bit high, but the setup cost was initially justified.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Check Point SandBlast Network?
I feel that Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved with slight delays in cleaning the file delivery. Additionally, I think it requires proper tuning to avoid unnecessary notifications.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Check Point SandBlast Network?
My main use case for Check Point SandBlast Network is advanced threat protection, especially for scanning emails, attachments, web downloads, and incoming files through a sandbox environment. A qui...
See all answers
What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection?
SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection needs to reconsider the pricing, especially in the cloud environment. The product is good overall, but the GUI needs to be more stable. I chose nine out...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection?
My main use case for SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection is that it helps us with sandboxing for analyzing and inspecting unknown files and URLs. A quick specific example of how I've used ...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection?
I advise others looking into using SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection to consider that it is truly helpful and very important to have great sandboxing with advanced threat protection to s...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 32% of the time
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 20% of the time
MetaDefender vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
MetaDefender vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 6% of the time
Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 4% of the time
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Compared 3% of the time
More Check Point SandBlast Network Competitors
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
Compared 25% of the time
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
Compared 18% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
Compared 8% of the time
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
Compared 7% of the time
Red Canary vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Red Canary vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
Compared 7% of the time
More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network
March 2026
Check Point SandBlast Network reportDownload Check Point SandBlast Network product report
Buyer's Guide
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
February 2026
SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection reportDownload SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection product report
 

Overview

Check Point’s evasion-resistant technology maximizes zero-day protection without compromising business productivity. For the first time, businesses can reduce the risk of unknown attacks by implementing a prevent-first approach. Learn More about Check Point Sandblast

Check Point Software Technologies

SonicWall Capture, a cloud based service available with SonicWall firewalls, revolutionizes advanced threat detection and sandboxing with a multi-engine approach to stopping unknown and zero-day attacks at the gateway, and with automated remediation. Customers benefit from high security effectiveness, fast response times and reduced total cost of ownership.

SonicWall
 

Sample Customers

Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media
Wonder Cement, Foster Clark Products
Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
March 2026
Free Report: Check Point SandBlast Network vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.