Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024
Fortinet FortiSandbox and Check Point SandBlast Network are major players in the cybersecurity market, focusing on threat detection and prevention. User reviews suggest Fortinet has an edge in pricing and customer support, while Check Point presents superior features for advanced threat prevention.
Features: Fortinet FortiSandbox offers robust integration with Fortinet products and comprehensive threat detection, including effective zero-day attack identification. Its ability to emulate multiple operating systems is highly valued. Check Point SandBlast Network excels with its advanced threat prevention techniques, utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning for high detection accuracy. It features proactive threat extraction and emulation, especially useful for zero-day threat management.
Room for Improvement: FortiSandbox could improve by enhancing third-party integration, increasing virtual environments, and clarifying licensing terms. Users have noted performance and false positive issues. Check Point SandBlast Network users recommend improving vendor integration, expanding file type support, and streamlining policy management. Faster email scanning and enhanced support for complex configurations are also desired.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiSandbox deploys swiftly across on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid environments, though users report slow initial support response times. Check Point SandBlast also offers versatile deployment options with reportedly better initial support despite configuration complexities, especially in hybrid settings.
Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiSandbox is noted for competitive and generally affordable pricing, though additional costs may apply for certain features. Its strong security capabilities justify the investment by preventing costly breaches. Check Point SandBlast Network, while expensive, is seen as offering a solid ROI through its effective threat prevention features, despite its higher cost.
