Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Contrast Security Protect comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Contrast Security are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while Contrast Security is ranked #36. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Contrast Security’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Contrast Security users who would recommend it.

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 81 Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) reviews

13,647 Views
4,231 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Contrast Security Protect

Read 3 Contrast Security Protect reviews

2,635 Views
2,503 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Contrast Security Protect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Contrast Security Protect and Check Point WAF are key competitors in application security. Contrast Security Protect offers seamless integration and faster deployment, while Check Point WAF provides advanced threat intelligence and comprehensive protection.

Features: Contrast Security Protect offers real-time protection, integrates with development tools, and provides real-time vulnerability analysis. Check Point WAF provides advanced threat intelligence, automatic traffic filtering, and superior traffic management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Contrast Security Protect features straightforward deployment with strong support resources, promoting quick adoption. Check Point WAF, despite robust support, involves a more complex deployment due to extensive configuration options.

Pricing and ROI: Contrast Security Protect is seen as providing significant value with lower setup cost and faster ROI. Check Point WAF, while potentially more expensive, offers substantial ROI for businesses prioritizing advanced security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Contrast Security Protect Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Contrast Security Protect

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (9th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Contrast Security Protect

Ranking in Application Security Tools

36th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Contrast Security Protect is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	1.1%
Contrast Security Protect	1.1%
Other	97.8%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

ToddMcAlister

Lead Application and Data Security Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

It provides us with more in-depth visibility into ongoing attacks.

I rate Contrast Security Protect eight out of 10. Overall, it's a solid product, but I deduct a couple of points because of the interface and some shortcomings in the reporting. If you have a large enterprise where you're dealing with a lot of servers, then it makes sense not to use the internal MySQL database. You should use something like Oracle or Microsoft SQL, but if you don't have many transactions, the embedded MySQL database works great.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the configuration and real-time monitoring features valuable."

"It helps me sleep at night, providing peace of mind."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF has positively impacted my organization by significantly improving both security and operational efficiency, with a noticeable reduction in web-based threats, especially automated attacks and vulnerability exploits, thanks to its real-time prevention and reputation filter that has streamlined my workflow through automatic policy updates and integration smoothly with my CI/CD pipelines, allowing my DevOps teams to deploy security without delays."

"Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) has positively impacted my organization by reducing security incidents."

"We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events."

"I have thousands of exposed websites and APIs. Being able to control what is happening and try to prevent any attack is the best feature."

"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."

"From a security perspective, it is quite good."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"The product gives a few false positives. We get 99 percent true positives."

"The solution has excellent real-time capabilities."

"Contrast Security's support is great. They're willing to spend a lot of time on your problem."

"The Protect solution allows applications to continue to run, even with known vulnerabilities, but will report or block attempts to exploit the vulnerabilities."

"Protect provides us with more in-depth visibility into ongoing attacks."

Cons

"Support could be improved, particularly in terms of availability."

"CloudGuard could improve in areas such as ease of integration with Fortinet and reducing costs associated with deployment in cloud environments like Azure."

"A gap for improvement for Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is the learning curve, as better training modules could help end customers, and pricing and reporting functionality could also be improved."

"They could include web functionalities such as sandboxing."

"We would like to have a solution of this type for the administration of applications from mobile devices."

"While Check Point CloudGuard WAF is a strong solution, it could be improved in a few areas such as simplifying and customizing the user interface and reporting database."

"Pricing is high, although possibly justified by the service received."

"We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"We're not using it much anymore because we had some performance issues."

"Protect's reporting GUI is very basic. To get all statuses from the APIs, we needed to write our own KPI dashboard to provide reports."

"Contrast Security Protect needs to improve integration."

"There's room for improvement in the initial setup."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"It is extremely affordable and high value for cost."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	40

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

SonarQube vs Contrast Security Protect

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Contrast Security Protect

Compared 8% of the time

Sqreen vs Contrast Security Protect

Compared 7% of the time

RevealSecurity vs Contrast Security Protect

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Contrast Security Protect

Compared 5% of the time

More Contrast Security Protect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

October 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2026

Download Contrast Security Protect product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

Contrast Protect

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Contrast Security Protect is an innovative security solution designed to provide continuous protection for applications through real-time analysis and automatic detection of vulnerabilities, ensuring robust safeguard measures during development and deployment phases.

Designed for advanced application security, Contrast Security Protect integrates seamlessly into DevOps workflows, offering continuous monitoring and protection against potential threats. Its intelligent architecture delivers in-depth insights and real-time analytics, enabling faster intervention to prevent breaches and maintain operational integrity. Facilitation of risk management is enhanced by in-app guidance and prompt alerts, supporting developers in addressing vulnerabilities efficiently.

What are the key features of Contrast Security Protect?

Real-Time Monitoring: Constantly checks applications for security breaches and vulnerabilities as they run.
Automated Threat Detection: Identifies and neutralizes threats without manual intervention.
Developer-Focused Insights: Provides actionable insights for developers to improve application security promptly.
Seamless DevOps Integration: Ensures smooth incorporation into existing DevOps practices.
In-App Guidance: Offers guidance within the application for resolving vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Security Posture: Offers continuous protection, reducing the risk of data breaches.
Increased Efficiency: Minimizes manual effort for identifying and correcting vulnerabilities.
Operational Integrity: Maintains uninterrupted business operations by mitigating threats swiftly.
Cost Savings: Reduces potential expenses related to data breaches and compliance penalties.

Contrast Security Protect is particularly beneficial in industries with stringent compliance requirements such as finance and healthcare, where application security is critical. By implementing these solutions, organizations in these sectors can effectively manage risk while ensuring compliance, enhancing overall security infrastructure.

Contrast Security

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Contrast Security Protect

November 2026

Free Report: Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Contrast Security Protect

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Contrast Security Protect and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Contrast Security Protect report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.