Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs SiteLock comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and SiteLock are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while SiteLock is ranked #37. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.0% mindshare in WAF, compared to SiteLock’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SiteLock users who would recommend it.

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 81 Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) reviews

13,647 Views
5,732 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SiteLock

Read 3 SiteLock reviews

4,200 Views
2,310 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

SiteLock

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

SiteLock and Check Point WAF compete in the web application firewall market, focusing on security needs. SiteLock has an advantage in pricing and support, attracting budget-conscious buyers, while Check Point WAF stands out with its robust features.

Features: SiteLock offers malware detection, automated security updates, and scalable integration. Check Point WAF provides advanced threat intelligence, deep packet inspection, and seamless integration into security frameworks, prioritizing high-level security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SiteLock is known for straightforward deployment and efficient customer support, facilitating quick implementation. Check Point WAF requires specialized configuration knowledge but offers thorough support and training resources.

Pricing and ROI: SiteLock has competitive setup costs, making it budget-friendly for basic security. The ROI is favorable for businesses aiming to protect assets without high expenditure. Check Point WAF requires a higher initial investment due to its advanced features, providing substantial long-term ROI through enhanced security.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. SiteLock Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. SiteLock

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (9th), DevSecOps (2nd)

SiteLock

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

37th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (46th), CDN (16th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 2.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SiteLock is 1.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	2.0%
SiteLock	1.8%
Other	96.2%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

it_user723534

Guitarist at a media company with self employed

It's not easy to get out once you're in

Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information. When you sign on for the paid service, Sitelock: * Hides (makes it difficult to find) that they default the auto-renew (you can't sign up without agreeing to have them automatically bill your credit card every year). * Hides (makes it difficult to find) how to stop auto-renew: * You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses. * You have to hunt their website for a link (in extremely small font) to the page which contains instructions for cancelling. * When you get to that page, turns out it's the 5000+ word "Terms of Service" document, which you have to scour to find a phone number. Then, you have to call and get put on hold (or if you like, they will call you back three days later). Once you finally get through, you have to jump through a lot of security hoops. All of the above, just to cancel the service. Their product may or may not be OK, but be forewarned that with Sitelock, it's not easy to get out once you're in.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool helps us to block IPs and applications."

"We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events."

"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."

"The tool performs device health checkups and updates us. It helps us to be compliant with regulatory policies."

"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."

"Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development."

"Since implementing Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), it has helped us to get more business, and along with that, we are able to prevent threats to our organization using Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)."

"Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) has improved my overall visibility and reduced the amount of suspicious traffic reaching our applications."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue with my website, but with SiteLock I was able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches."

"It seems to provide a bit of useful information on website health."

Cons

"The pricing can be a bit complex to understand initially."

"I do not know if it is already there, but I would like to have complete visibility between the posture management and firewall as a service."

"The negative side I see is that while most things about Check Point CloudGuard WAF are really good, there is some latency and performance issues, as it can be slow to log in, especially from different regions."

"For now, the product is doing all that I need, however, I need the support of IPv6."

"AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate; that is the advantage of FortiGate now."

"The ease of use could be better."

"The trial version should be extended further so that QA test engineers can actually test the utilities in a real sense and can provide the maximum amount of feedback for enhancements."

"It was costlier than other solutions."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

"You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	40

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Cloudflare vs SiteLock

Compared 11% of the time

Comodo cWatch vs SiteLock

Compared 11% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs SiteLock

Compared 10% of the time

Sucuri vs SiteLock

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx One vs SiteLock

Compared 5% of the time

More SiteLock Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

October 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

October 2026

Download SiteLock product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

SiteLock provides web security solutions focused on safeguarding websites against cyber threats and vulnerabilities. It offers businesses an effective way to protect their online presence, ensuring that their data and customers are secure.

SiteLock is a versatile web security platform designed to address the diverse security needs of businesses. It features continuous monitoring, malware protection, and advanced threat detection to fortify website defenses. Businesses can rely on SiteLock to protect against malicious attacks, ensuring data integrity and customer trust. Its easy integration with existing systems makes it a preferred choice for enhancing website security without disruption.

What are the key features of SiteLock?

Website Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities and malware threats regularly.
Malware Removal: Automated tools to remove harmful content quickly.
Firewall: Blocks malicious traffic to safeguard against DDoS attacks.
PCI Compliance: Helps meet industry security standards with ease.

What benefits should users expect from SiteLock?

Enhanced Security: Continuous monitoring for peace of mind.
Cost-Effective: Reduces expenses related to breach management.
Customer Trust: Protecting data enhances brand credibility.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration without workflow interruptions.

SiteLock is tailored for various industries, including retail, healthcare, and financial services. Retailers benefit from protecting payment processing systems, while healthcare providers ensure patient data security. Financial services use SiteLock for safeguarding sensitive information, making it an essential component of their data protection strategy.

SiteLock

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. SiteLock

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. SiteLock

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. SiteLock and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. SiteLock report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.