Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while Wallarm is ranked #39. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.0% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 79 Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) reviews

11,929 Views
5,368 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

2,103 Views
1,430 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Wallarm NG WAF and Check Point WAF are both strong contenders in the web application firewall space, with Wallarm leading in adaptive threat detection and AI-driven security, while Check Point offers a broad feature set ideal for large enterprises.

Features:Wallarm NG WAF boasts machine learning capabilities, adaptive threat detection, and a low false positive rate, making it effective for accurate threat identification. Check Point WAF provides advanced bot protection, integrated threat intelligence, and scalability across networks. Both solutions emphasize AI-driven security, but Check Point offers more traditional yet comprehensive security features.

Room for Improvement:Wallarm NG WAF could expand its feature list to attract larger organizations looking for a wide array of tools. Improved scalability might also enhance its appeal to enterprise customers. Closer integration with cloud platforms could broaden its usability. Check Point WAF's complex setup process may benefit from simplification to ease deployment. An enhancement in support response times could improve user experience. More competitive pricing might make it accessible to smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Wallarm NG WAF is known for its straightforward and prompt deployment, coupled with personalized customer service. Its configuration process is user-friendly, allowing for quick adaptation. On the other hand, Check Point WAF, while detailed, demands meticulous setup due to its extensive features. Its customer support is extensive and corporate, which can create delays but offers broad assistance.

Pricing and ROI:Wallarm NG WAF offers competitive pricing aimed at small to medium businesses, promising quick ROI through effective threat management. Check Point WAF provides a high ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive security suite, although at a higher price point. Its cost reflects its ability to manage extensive and complex environments providing long-term security benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Wallarm NG WAF

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (7th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	2.0%
Wallarm NG WAF	1.1%
Other	96.9%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF delivers clear efficiency gains over traditional WAFs in three main areas: operations, accuracy, and cost optimization."

"Its main value and what we liked the most is its powerful AI."

"I rate it ten out of ten."

"The tool helps us to block IPs and applications."

"Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) has positively impacted my organization by reducing rule maintenance, leading to less or near-zero false positives, and enabling frictionless DevSecOps alignment."

"The implementation of this tool for security management and control is very simple."

"The tool performs device health checkups and updates us. It helps us to be compliant with regulatory policies."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"Vulnerability scanner and WAF are valuable features."

"Perimeter control and active vulnerability scanner are the most valuable features."

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

"The most powerful feature is the ability to first learn what type of query to make to your web application when it is attacked and what type of query creates a false positive to your app."

"With active threat detection, we are no longer over-swamped with tons of useless events."

"They are the only solution that fits our success criteria and business objectives: WAF must have a low (<5%) false negative rate and be ready to protect from all well-known web attacks."

Cons

"They need improved latency in the main window."

"In terms of features, I do not have any negatives. Their integration is extremely quick. It is better than others I have been involved with in the past. Their pricing model, however, can be better."

"There are occasions when it interfaces with other systems, leading to a loss of visibility."

"Pricing is high, although possibly justified by the service received."

"A feature we'd like to see in the future is something that could protect against other attack vectors, with a focus on application protection."

"The negative side I see is that while most things about Check Point CloudGuard WAF are really good, there is some latency and performance issues, as it can be slow to log in, especially from different regions."

"The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations. It took approximately a month and a half to understand how the solution works because of inadequate documentation."

"I am pretty happy with the current version. I have not yet used it to its full potential, but there could be improvements as I explore it further."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"Technical support is 6 or 7 out of 10. Sometimes we have had trouble with communication and understanding."

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

"There were several stability issues during the first pilot."

"Wallarm uses a learning mechanism to detect attacks and to avoid false positives. If Wallarm blocks some illegitimate request, then you can go to the management console and mark this request as false positive, but sometimes this does not work properly."

"It needs more customization in PDF reports."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	38

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

Venusense Web Application Firewall vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudflare vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 5% of the time

NetScaler vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 3% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

September 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

September 2026

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Wallarm NG WAF provides advanced security by integrating machine learning, making it essential for modern web applications. It offers protection against sophisticated threats and automates many processes.

Wallarm NG WAF leverages AI-driven technology to deliver robust security measures. It helps in defending web applications from cybersecurity threats with enhanced threat detection and response capabilities. Beyond vulnerability insights, Wallarm enhances security protocols, scales with growing online demands, and ensures comprehensive threat coverage, fostering a safer web environment.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

AI-Powered Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates sophisticated attacks efficiently.
Automated Security Updates: Continuously updates defense strategies without manual intervention.
Flexible Deployment: Easily integrates across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid setups.
Scalability: Adapts to growing traffic volumes with consistent protection.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive analytics on web security posture.

What benefits can users expect from Wallarm NG WAF?

Increased Security: Enhances threat detection and reduces vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual intervention with automated tasks.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes security expenditure by preventing potential breaches.
Time Savings: Automates repetitive actions, saving valuable time for IT teams.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and healthcare, Wallarm NG WAF is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with stringent security standards. Its adaptability allows it to meet industry-specific requirements, offering specialized configurations tailored to each sector's unique demands.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Wallarm NG WAF

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.