Checkmk vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

Checkmk and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.4, while ManageEngine is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4. Checkmk holds a 3.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

3,526 Views
3,137 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 51 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

3,326 Views
2,033 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Checkmk

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and Checkmk compete in the network monitoring software category. ManageEngine OpManager may have the upper hand with its comprehensive monitoring capabilities and user-friendly deployment, while Checkmk stands out for its streamlined operations and modern alert system.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers extensive network monitoring, real-time alerting, and automation for service recovery, making it ideal for diverse network environments. It supports easy deployment and manages a wide range of network devices. Checkmk provides an efficient auto-discovery feature that simplifies setup, strong integration capabilities, and reliable alerting for immediate issue response.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could improve by simplifying its complex configuration, enhancing support responsiveness, and expanding storage monitoring functions. Users suggest more intuitive dashboards and possible AI integration. Checkmk may benefit from improved third-party system integration, a more user-friendly interface, and better data presentation for those less familiar with its existing format.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager offers on-premises and public cloud deployment, though users note challenges with insufficient local expertise and delayed issue resolution. Its technical support is generally responsive. Checkmk is available for both on-premises and private cloud deployment, with customer service known for prompt and effective support, though it lacks 24/7 availability.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is seen as cost-effective, with a flexible licensing model and potential discounts on bundles. Users find the ROI quick, reducing admin overheads. Checkmk is noted for its affordability and straightforward pricing, appealing to organizations with tighter budgets. Its streamlined operations and efficient alert system contribute to a rapid ROI by minimizing downtime.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (13th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 3.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

More Checkmk pros

"It helps us a lot for monitoring our servers in one console, instead of going to individual servers."

"I liked Network Configuration Manager. They had some pretty decent features there, and they also had pretty good monitoring and alerts."

"OpManager can monitor network utilization, downtime, and services in real time."

"ManageEngine OpManager is user-friendly and easy to use. Additionally, useful for basic monitoring."

"Monitoring is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"In my three years of experience with OpManager, we haven't encountered any issues. So, I'd rate it a nine out of ten. It's very stable."

"The dashboard is unique and user-friendly."

"This is a good general monitoring system that has all the features we require and they constantly update with new capabilities."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

Cons

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

More Checkmk cons

"They should add more features to URL monitoring."

"Some of our customers have been asking that OpManager have a feature to monitor the operating system, however, I tell them that Endpoint Central is doing that. You can buy endpoints and then OpManager, and they integrate between them, and everything is okay."

"We would like link monitoring included. At times we need to monitor those specific links closely."

"With regard to configurations, however, it would be nice to have more documentation on SNMP configurations. For example, if I want to add a new vendor, it would be great if ManageEngine provided the requirements for that vendor, such as the commands needed."

"The main area for improvement for ManageEngine OpManager is its performance."

"We encounter challenges in monitoring cloud services. I would also appreciate it if there was someone available to walk you through the documentation."

"This product is little bit slow sometimes. It may be that we need to change the configuration to improve performance."

"There needs to be improvements to make the solution capable of supporting more devices, and it would be good to see an option for automatic deployment."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The product is affordable."

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"It is reasonably priced."

"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."

"The solution is highly affordable"

"We had perpetual licenses. The cost was around 36,000 for OPManager, and then you'd have the yearly maintenance fee of 2,000 or 3,000."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive."

"The pricing is moderate."

"The price for ManageEngine OpManager is average."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

47%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 50% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 10% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 7% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

Observium vs Checkmk

Compared 3% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 25% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 13% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 7% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

March 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

March 2025

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Also Known As

No data available

OpManager

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Checkmk

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager

March 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.