CIRA Anycast DNS vs Cisco Umbrella comparison

Cisco Umbrella delivers rapid DNS security with over 30,000 customers, providing outstanding threat protection and handling more than 600 billion requests daily. It's recognized for high threat efficacy in the SSE domain and integrates elements like SWG, ZTNA, CASB, and more.

Cisco Umbrella is renowned for its effective DNS-layer security against ransomware and phishing. It offers flexible content filtering and integrates seamlessly with existing networks while providing single-pane-of-glass management for centralized monitoring. Its robust threat intelligence and customizable policies are central to its appeal. Users highlight room for improvement in areas like WHOIS data inclusion, malware enhancement, and reporting analytics. Integration with other threat feeds and better client support are requested for more comprehensive coverage.

• DNS-Layer Security: Blocks malicious domains, preventing ransomware attacks.
• Web Content Filtering: Allows users to manage lists for strict content control.
• Seamless Integration: Blends with systems like Active Directory and Meraki.
• Remote Protection: Keeps remote users safe across different locations.
• Single-Pane Management: Facilitates effective monitoring and reporting.

• Threat Intelligence: Provides comprehensive malware and attack data.
• Customizable Policies: Enables tailored security measures for users.
• Integration Options: Works with diverse systems for holistic security.
• Ease of Use: Offers a straightforward experience for administrators.
• Remote Worker Security: Ensures protection outside traditional networks.

Industries implement Cisco Umbrella primarily for DNS-level security, web filtering, and protecting remote employees. It strengthens cybersecurity frameworks by blocking malware and avoiding access to harmful sites. The tool is widely integrated with Active Directory and Cisco Meraki, providing consistent internet security for employees.