Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Umbrella based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Cloudflare, and Quad9.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Fortinet FortiGate is favored for its cost efficiency and robust on-premise deployment, appealing to those with budget constraints. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella, with its cloud-native features, targets organizations seeking advanced security and flexibility, particularly suited for remote work environments.
Cloudflare offers cost-effective CDN services and DDoS protection with simple deployment. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella's advanced threat intelligence and DNS-layer security justify a higher cost. Cloudflare is noted for its quick setup; Cisco Umbrella provides detailed support and sophisticated threat detection in its integration capabilities.
Cisco Umbrella offers extensive security features suitable for comprehensive protection needs. In comparison, Quad9, with its cost-free model, appeals to budget-conscious users despite fewer features. Quad9's emphasis on privacy contrasts with Umbrella's broader security scope, fitting different cost and security priorities.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher initial setup cost compared to the cost-effective Quad9, making Quad9 an attractive option for budget-conscious users. Cisco offers more robust features, whereas Quad9 focuses on affordability.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher initial setup cost compared to the cost-effective Quad9, making Quad9 an attractive option for budget-conscious users. Cisco offers more robust features, whereas Quad9 focuses on affordability.
Cisco Umbrella specializes in DNS-based protection and integrates well with existing infrastructure. In comparison, iboss focuses on granular traffic scanning and offers extensive cloud and on-premises security. A tech buyer might choose Umbrella for advanced threat intelligence or iboss for comprehensive data control and affordability.
Cisco Umbrella incurs a higher setup cost, while iboss offers a more budget-friendly setup. This cost distinction highlights diverse price approaches for users.
Cisco Umbrella incurs a higher setup cost, while iboss offers a more budget-friendly setup. This cost distinction highlights diverse price approaches for users.
Cisco Umbrella enhances productivity with DNS-based security and easy cloud deployment. In comparison, Prisma Access provides extensive security features like SD-WAN and zero-trust. Customers might prefer Cisco for its ease of use, while Prisma attracts with robust integration capabilities.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup cost that appeals to businesses seeking simplicity, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks demands a more substantial initial investment, reflecting its advanced feature offerings.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup cost that appeals to businesses seeking simplicity, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks demands a more substantial initial investment, reflecting its advanced feature offerings.
Zscaler Internet Access offers robust security features and seamless remote protection, ideal for managing remote users. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-layer security and integration, appealing to those who prioritize effective threat detection and consistent visibility across environments.
Zscaler Internet Access has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Umbrella, presenting a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Cisco Umbrella offers a wider range of premium features, potentially justifying its higher initial investment.
Zscaler Internet Access has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Umbrella, presenting a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Cisco Umbrella offers a wider range of premium features, potentially justifying its higher initial investment.
Cisco Umbrella enhances network safety with DNS security and ease of policy implementation, ideal for those prioritizing DNS-based threat protection. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform delivers security through SASE infrastructure, suitable for environments needing advanced internet and private access control.
Cisco Umbrella has a minimal setup cost benefiting from a simple integration process, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform involves a higher initial setup investment due to its comprehensive security features and configuration requirements.
Cisco Umbrella has a minimal setup cost benefiting from a simple integration process, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform involves a higher initial setup investment due to its comprehensive security features and configuration requirements.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS-based protection, web content filtering, and easy integration, making it ideal for those needing comprehensive malware defense. In comparison, Cloudflare One offers DDoS protection and enhanced application performance with a unified console, appealing to those prioritizing global CDN and application-level security.
Netskope excels in cloud app security and shadow IT discovery, appealing to data-centric organizations. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS security and integration capabilities. Netskope may need integration improvements, while Cisco Umbrella could enhance malware protection and support for various devices.
Netskope offers a lower initial setup cost, while Cisco Umbrella tends to have higher upfront expenses, highlighting a cost-related difference between the two solutions.
Netskope offers a lower initial setup cost, while Cisco Umbrella tends to have higher upfront expenses, highlighting a cost-related difference between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella excels in comprehensive DNS security with seamless Cisco product integration, appealing to tech buyers valuing ease of deployment. In comparison, Cato SASE Cloud Platform offers a unified SASE solution with strong SD-WAN capabilities, suiting those seeking operational cost savings with a flexible, integrated platform.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps integrates deeply within Microsoft's ecosystem, enhancing security management for existing users. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS-layer protection, ideal for decentralized environments. Each caters to specific organizational needs, with Defender focusing on visibility and Umbrella on network-level threat prevention.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps has a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, whereas Cisco Umbrella offers advanced security features, justifying its higher setup expense.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps has a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, whereas Cisco Umbrella offers advanced security features, justifying its higher setup expense.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS-layer security ideal for compliance and productivity, while Check Point Harmony SASE excels with Zero Trust Network Access, ensuring secure resource access. In comparison, Umbrella's easy management contrasts with Harmony's advanced data loss prevention features.
Cisco Umbrella has a lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly solution, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE entails a higher initial investment, emphasizing its comprehensive, feature-rich capabilities.
Cisco Umbrella has a lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly solution, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE entails a higher initial investment, emphasizing its comprehensive, feature-rich capabilities.
Cisco Umbrella, with its robust real-time DNS protection and cloud capabilities, suits decentralized operations seeking compliance and easy management. In comparison, Infoblox’s advanced DNS protection and IP management cater to businesses requiring granular control over DNS and network resources.
Skyhigh Security focuses on shadow IT detection, providing DLP and compliance monitoring. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS security with web filtering and threat intelligence. Tech buyers might choose Skyhigh for DLP integration, while Cisco Umbrella is preferred for DNS-level protection.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-based security with comprehensive filtering and malware protection. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks DNS Security targets threat mitigation with features like DNS sinkhole. Tech buyers might choose Cisco for broad content control or Palo Alto for direct threat defense.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has higher setup costs compared to Cisco Umbrella, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. While both cater to web security needs, the cost difference is a significant factor when considering these solutions.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has higher setup costs compared to Cisco Umbrella, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. While both cater to web security needs, the cost difference is a significant factor when considering these solutions.
Cisco Umbrella excels in domain security with malware protection and DNS-based attack prevention, ideal for complex deployment models. In comparison, Perception Point Advanced Email Security focuses on multi-layer threat detection for emails, making it suitable for seamless cloud integration and cost-effective protection solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Perception Point Advanced Email Security may involve a more complex setup and higher initial expenses.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Perception Point Advanced Email Security may involve a more complex setup and higher initial expenses.
Cisco Umbrella excels with DNS-based threat protection and flexible filtering, appealing to those prioritizing network security. In comparison, Fortinet FortiProxy offers traffic inspection and control, suiting organizations needing detailed policy enforcement and reporting.
Cisco Umbrella offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Fortinet FortiProxy, which requires a higher initial investment. The difference in setup costs between these solutions may impact budget-conscious buyers.
Cisco Umbrella offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Fortinet FortiProxy, which requires a higher initial investment. The difference in setup costs between these solutions may impact budget-conscious buyers.
Cisco Umbrella focuses on extensive security measures, including DNS-layer protection and customizable filtering for enhanced network security. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers Zero Trust and CASB capabilities, providing data protection across cloud applications, catering to organizations with significant reliance on cloud environments.
Cisco Umbrella features a setup cost highlighted for its accessibility and scalability, while Forcepoint ONE indicates a higher initial investment. The distinct difference in setup costs reflects their varied approach to deployment and flexibility.
Cisco Umbrella features a setup cost highlighted for its accessibility and scalability, while Forcepoint ONE indicates a higher initial investment. The distinct difference in setup costs reflects their varied approach to deployment and flexibility.
Cisco Umbrella appeals to those seeking affordability with DNS-layer security and efficient management. In comparison, Menlo Protect attracts buyers focused on robust threat isolation with secure cloud execution, despite potentially higher costs, offering personalized support to aid integration with existing systems and deliver strong ROI.
Cisco Umbrella offers strong threat intelligence and flexible pricing, ideal for rapid deployment. In comparison, Axis Security emphasizes a zero-trust architecture for secure remote access without a VPN, appealing to those prioritizing security, despite a more complex setup and higher initial costs.
Cisco Umbrella has higher initial setup costs, while Axis Security offers a more affordable entry point, highlighting a significant budget consideration difference.
Cisco Umbrella has higher initial setup costs, while Axis Security offers a more affordable entry point, highlighting a significant budget consideration difference.
Cisco Umbrella excels in integration and adaptability, appealing to those needing seamless DNS-layer security. In comparison, Heimdal Endpoint Security, with its advanced threat detection and comprehensive features, attracts tech buyers seeking thorough protection despite higher costs and configuration efforts.
Cisco Umbrella's setup costs are generally lower, while Heimdal Endpoint Security often involves higher initial expenses. Heimdal provides more customizable security solutions, whereas Cisco offers streamlined deployment for straightforward protection.
Cisco Umbrella's setup costs are generally lower, while Heimdal Endpoint Security often involves higher initial expenses. Heimdal provides more customizable security solutions, whereas Cisco offers streamlined deployment for straightforward protection.
Cisco Umbrella is favored for ease of deployment and customer support, making it ideal for those prioritizing straightforward setup and integrated security. In comparison, Akamai Edge DNS excels in providing robust security and scalability, appealing to tech buyers needing strong global performance.
Cisco Umbrella requires a significant initial setup cost, while Akamai Edge DNS offers a more modest expense. Cisco positions itself as a premium solution, contrasting with Akamai's cost-effective approach.
Cisco Umbrella requires a significant initial setup cost, while Akamai Edge DNS offers a more modest expense. Cisco positions itself as a premium solution, contrasting with Akamai's cost-effective approach.
Cisco Umbrella excels in web filtering and DNS-layer security, ensuring secure browsing. In comparison, Infoblox BloxOne offers specialized DNS management and threat insights. Cisco's broader integrations attract customers seeking comprehensive protection, while Infoblox appeals to those prioritizing DNS control and intelligence.
Cisco Umbrella demonstrates affordability with competitive setup costs, whereas Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense is perceived as having higher initial expenses.
Cisco Umbrella demonstrates affordability with competitive setup costs, whereas Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense is perceived as having higher initial expenses.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust web filtering and ease of deployment with DNS-layer security, appealing to those seeking quick integration. In comparison, Netskope excels in granular policy enforcement and cloud security, attracting buyers needing detailed SaaS management and data protection.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway provides a more comprehensive setup at a higher price point.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway provides a more comprehensive setup at a higher price point.
Cisco Umbrella is preferable for cost-effective, immediate protection with simple deployment. In comparison, NordLayer's higher investment is justified by extensive features and customization. Cisco Umbrella suits those valuing quick setup, while NordLayer appeals to those seeking advanced capabilities and robust customer support.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with a flat fee, while NordLayer requires initial setup costs that vary based on business needs. The pricing structures highlight Cisco's predictable costs versus NordLayer's flexible, customizable investment.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup with a flat fee, while NordLayer requires initial setup costs that vary based on business needs. The pricing structures highlight Cisco's predictable costs versus NordLayer's flexible, customizable investment.
Cisco Umbrella offers efficient DNS-based security with cloud management, ideal for hybrid environments. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP DNS excels in global traffic management and DDoS protection, appealing to organizations needing advanced traffic control and high availability.
Cisco Umbrella setup cost is generally low, while F5 BIG-IP DNS requires a higher upfront investment, making the former more cost-effective for initial deployment.
Cisco Umbrella setup cost is generally low, while F5 BIG-IP DNS requires a higher upfront investment, making the former more cost-effective for initial deployment.
Cisco Umbrella focuses on adaptability and cost-effectiveness with cloud-delivered security and threat intelligence. In comparison, EfficientIP DNS Guardian offers advanced DNS-level protection and requires a larger investment for a tailored deployment, appealing to those needing specialized security and targeted assistance.
Cisco Umbrella involves a moderate setup cost, while EfficientIP DNS Guardian requires a higher initial investment, differentiating the two offerings in terms of affordability and budget considerations for deployment.
Cisco Umbrella involves a moderate setup cost, while EfficientIP DNS Guardian requires a higher initial investment, differentiating the two offerings in terms of affordability and budget considerations for deployment.
Cisco Umbrella offers DNS security and cloud integration, appealing to firms with hybrid environments seeking enhanced content filtering. In comparison, Symantec Proxy, requiring on-premises installation, emphasizes detailed traffic inspection and control, benefiting organizations needing more direct network management.
Trend Micro Web Security offers competitive pricing with robust support and integration capabilities for existing infrastructures. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella, with its cloud-native setup, higher initial cost, and comprehensive feature set, offers scalability and long-term value appealing to enterprises aiming for extensive protections.
Trend Micro Web Security offers a straightforward setup process with transparent costs, while Cisco Umbrella has a more complex setup with varied pricing, highlighting a key difference in initial investment and implementation requirements between the two solutions.
Trend Micro Web Security offers a straightforward setup process with transparent costs, while Cisco Umbrella has a more complex setup with varied pricing, highlighting a key difference in initial investment and implementation requirements between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers DNS-based security and integration with Cisco products, ideal for those seeking comprehensive security frameworks. In comparison, TitanHQ WebTitan excels in ease of deployment and straightforward setup, appealing to organizations prioritizing simplicity in web security management.
Cisco Umbrella is praised for seamless deployment and strong service options. In comparison, DNSFilter excels in targeted threat detection and streamlined filtering. Tech buyers might choose Umbrella for broad security reach, while others may prefer DNSFilter for specialized content protection capabilities.
Cisco Umbrella involves higher setup costs than DNSFilter, making it less budget-friendly. Conversely, DNSFilter offers a more economical setup, perfect for cost-conscious users.
Cisco Umbrella involves higher setup costs than DNSFilter, making it less budget-friendly. Conversely, DNSFilter offers a more economical setup, perfect for cost-conscious users.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-layer security and ease of integration, making it ideal for robust protection against threats. In comparison, Forcepoint CASB focuses on cloud application security, providing detailed control and DLP tool integration, suitable for managing shadow IT activities effectively.
Cisco Umbrella offers a cost-effective setup, while Forcepoint CASB involves a higher initial investment. Key differences in setup costs may influence user decisions based on budget considerations.
Cisco Umbrella offers a cost-effective setup, while Forcepoint CASB involves a higher initial investment. Key differences in setup costs may influence user decisions based on budget considerations.
Cisco Umbrella provides exceptional DNS-based protection and integration with Cisco's Secure suite. In comparison, BlueCat Edge offers superior flexibility in DNS traffic routing and effective filtering. Buyers might prefer Cisco for simplicity or BlueCat for complex DNS management needs.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while BlueCat Edge requires more investment and resources during installation, highlighting the contrast in their setup cost and complexity.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while BlueCat Edge requires more investment and resources during installation, highlighting the contrast in their setup cost and complexity.
Cisco Umbrella, with its DNS-layer security, provides cost-effective malware and phishing protection. In comparison, Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise delivers comprehensive security with advanced threat analytics and identity management, appealing to those seeking in-depth insights and long-term ROI despite higher initial costs.
Cisco Umbrella offers efficient deployment with DNS-layer security, appealing to those prioritizing ease and quick integration. In comparison, Symantec Secure Web Gateway provides extensive feature sets and customization, attracting buyers seeking comprehensive web filtering and advanced threat protection.
Cisco Umbrella has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Secure Web Gateway, allowing businesses to save on initial expenses. In contrast, Symantec may offer different features that can justify the higher setup expense.
Cisco Umbrella has a lower setup cost compared to Symantec Secure Web Gateway, allowing businesses to save on initial expenses. In contrast, Symantec may offer different features that can justify the higher setup expense.
Cisco Umbrella focuses on DNS layer protection, offering custom site blocking to enhance productivity and compliance. In comparison, Check Point Web Gateway provides detailed URL filtering and application control with advanced Threat Prevention, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive protection against varied online threats.
Cisco Umbrella offers a more straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while Check Point Web Gateway requires a more complex configuration and higher setup fees.
Cisco Umbrella offers a more straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while Check Point Web Gateway requires a more complex configuration and higher setup fees.
Barracuda, with competitive pricing and personalized support, appeals to organizations seeking effective malware protection and content filtering. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella, known for its advanced cloud-based security features and in-depth analytics, attracts tech buyers prioritizing comprehensive threat intelligence and higher long-term ROI.
Proofpoint Cloud App Security Broker is attractive for its pricing and excellent support. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella impresses with comprehensive security features. Tech buyers favor Proofpoint for cost efficiency, while Cisco's robust integration is ideal for those needing advanced protection.
Cisco Umbrella impresses with extensive threat protection and integration simplicity. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Browse excels in advanced threat detection and cost-effectiveness for smaller projects. Cisco suits those needing ease of deployment, while Check Point offers flexible policy customization.
Cisco Umbrella offers lower setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony Browse, which has higher initial expenses. This makes Umbrella more budget-friendly for businesses looking to minimize upfront costs, providing a cost-effective entry point compared to Harmony Browse.
Cisco Umbrella offers lower setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony Browse, which has higher initial expenses. This makes Umbrella more budget-friendly for businesses looking to minimize upfront costs, providing a cost-effective entry point compared to Harmony Browse.
