Menlo Secure Reviews

Name: Menlo Secure
Brand: Menlo Security
Rating: 4.6 (5 reviews)

Vendor: Menlo Security

4.6 out of 5

5 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

What is Menlo Secure?

Menlo Security Secure Application Access

Get the Menlo Secure Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Menlo Secure, Fortinet FortiGate, iboss and more!

Menlo Secure is the #8 ranked solution in top Cloud Security Remediation solutions, #23 ranked solution in top ZTNA solutions, #27 ranked solution in top Web Security Gateways, and #53 ranked solution in best firewalls. PeerSpot users give Menlo Secure an average rating of 9.2 out of 10. Menlo Secure is most commonly compared to Fortinet FortiGate: Menlo Secure vs Fortinet FortiGate. Menlo Secure is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 47% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 16% of all views.

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Featured Menlo Secure reviews

reviewer2701794

Head Of Bluechip Enterprise at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

There aren't specific areas for improvement; however, they're not as well known as the big vendors such as Palo Alto. Menlo Secure is a smaller company with limited resources and funding, which makes it challenging to compete with larger companies such as Palo and Cisco. What can be improved is market awareness and adoption of the technology. When selling it in the channel, regardless of how good the technology might be, success depends more on market adoption and awareness.

Read full review

JCP

CISO at gsis

The user monitoring could still be improved. We are a government agency, so we purchased Menlo by user. If we have 3,000 users, we need to see that all 3,000 users are able to use Menlo. However, there aren't any reports that say, "In the past six months, all 3,000 users have logged in," because there are some cases where SSL is bypassed, for example. When they access sites like that, the user is not tagged as a normal user, so 3,000 may become 2,900, but I still need to account for 100 users. I'm working with Menlo right now to make sure that all user activity will be visible to me.

Read full review

Olivier DALOY

Group Information Systems Security Director - CISO at Faurecia

The solution should have no impact but it does have a bit of impact on end-users. For example, we encountered some issues in the downloads that took longer than they did without using Menlo. That is clearly not transparent for users. We expected not to have any latency when downloading anything from the internet with Menlo compared to without Menlo. We are now transitioning to another solution. The main reason for that is that managing all of the exceptions and troubleshooting all of the issues our users have had connecting to the internet has become too significant in terms of workload, compared to what we hope we will have with another solution. In other words, we hope to get the same level of protection, while reducing the number of visible bugs, issues, latencies, impacts on performance, et cetera, that we have today with Menlo. We already solved most of them, but we still have too many such instances of issues with Menlo, even though it is protecting us for sure. The weak point of the solution is that it has consumed far too much of my team's time, taking them away from operations and projects and design. It took far too much time to implement it and get rid of all of the live issues that we encountered when our users started using the solution. The good point is that I'm sure it is protecting us and it's probably protecting us more than any other solution, which is something I appreciate a lot as a CISO. But on the other hand, the number of issues reported by the users, and the amount of time that has been necessary for either my team or the infrastructure team to spend diagnosing, troubleshooting, and fixing the issues that we had with the solution was too much. And that doesn't include the need to still use our previous solution, Blue Coat, that we have kept active so that whatever is not compatible or doesn't work with Menlo, can be handled by that other solution. It is far too demanding in terms of effort and workload and even cost, at the end of the day. That is why we decided to transition to another solution. If we had known in the beginning that we would not be able to get rid of Blue Coat, we probably would not have chosen Menlo because we were planning to replace Blue Coat with something that was at least able to do the same and more. We discovered that it was able to do more but it was not able to replace it, which is an issue. It is not only a matter of cost but is also a matter of not being able to reduce the number of partners that you have to deal with. In addition, they could enhance the ability to troubleshoot. Whenever a connection going through Menlo fails for any reason, being able to troubleshoot what the configuration of Menlo should be to allow it through would help, as would knowing what level of additional risk we would be taking with that configuration.

Read full review

Menlo Secure mindshare

Product category:

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Menlo Secure in the Cloud Security Remediation category stands at 1.9%, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Security Remediation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Menlo Secure	1.9%
Wiz Code	30.5%
Seemplicity	17.8%
Other	49.8%

Cloud Security Remediation

PeerResearch reports based on Menlo Secure reviews

Type	Title	Date
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Mar 25, 2026	Download
Comparison	Menlo Secure vs Wiz Code	Mar 25, 2026	Download
Comparison	Menlo Secure vs Vulcan Cyber	Mar 25, 2026	Download

Valuable Features

Menlo Secure's most valued features include web isolation, a single console for security policy management, and user-friendly administration. Organizations appreciate seamless user experience while accessing legitimate websites and protection from phishing. The cloud proxy functionality allows easy expansion without physical installations. SSL decryption aids in detecting malicious traffic with options to exempt specific sites from decryption. The reporting feature and flexibility in internet browsing control add to its effectiveness.

"This security technology addresses risk and enables people to conduct business without that risk, which is where the ROI is realized."
"Accessing the internet with a proxy from anywhere is the most valuable feature. It ensures that users are only able to browse legitimate websites. If they happen to go to a legitimate website with a malicious payload, the isolation feature will take care of that."
"For us, the primary goal is protection on the web, and that's extremely important. We're not using any of the other services at this time. The web part is key to the success of the organization. It gives us the ability to protect. It can isolate. It opens the session in an isolated format so that the code isn't running locally. It is running over in the Menlo environment, not in ours. It is not running on the local computer, whereas if you were to go to a normal website, it would run Java or something else on the local machine and potentially execute the malicious code locally. So, it does give us that level of protection."

Room for Improvement

Menlo Secure needs improvements in exception management for complex sites and user monitoring capabilities. Troubleshooting and report generation remain challenging, leading to significant time investment and workload for teams. Transitioning to other programs is considered due to performance impacts such as latency and ongoing compatibility issues. Menlo Secure is less known compared to larger companies, affecting market adoption and awareness. It faces limitations in resources and funding, impacting its ability to compete effectively.

"Menlo Secure is a smaller company with limited resources and funding, which makes it challenging to compete with larger companies such as Palo and Cisco."
"The user monitoring could still be improved."
"Currently, I don't have a good way to see which of my rules are being used in the access control lists. I have numerous entries, but are they all still needed? A report that would show me my list of who is allowed and whether we're actually using it would be useful because I can then go clean up my list. It would be easier to manage. We would eliminate the vulnerability of unused services."

ROI

Organizations experienced ROI with Menlo Secure through malware prevention, enhanced access to web information, and reduced security-related costs. Efficiency improved as staff accessed the internet securely from any location. Users noted savings in money and time due to decreased effort in incident management. Although direct comparisons with competitors like Skyhigh Security are upcoming, many saw immediate benefits after implementation. The technology mitigates risk, enabling business operations without compromise, justifying its costs.

Pricing

Menlo Secure's pricing is generally viewed as appropriate and competitive for enterprise customers considering the protection and scalability offered. Users appreciate its flexibility, allowing easy scaling by adding additional users without requiring costly hardware investments. While some find it more expensive than previous solutions, the costs are justified by the value and security provided. When evaluated against other cloud-based options, costs are competitive, especially if potential cost savings, like eliminating other technologies, are realized.

"The solution is expensive. It's more expensive than the solution I previously used. Compared with the other cloud-based solutions, it's very competitive."
"It is appropriately priced for what they're doing for us. Considering the protection provided, I feel their pricing is spot-on."
"We save a ton of money and time. Previously, the numerous hits that we were receiving from our security tools, prior to implementing them, had to all be chased down, dispositioned, and endpoints had to be reimaged. It was just a ton of effort to do all that. That is where the savings from time and money come in."

Popular Use Cases

Menlo Secure primarily isolates web browsing to protect network endpoints from vulnerabilities, using cloud-based web isolation to prevent malware and phishing risks. It integrates with existing systems like Active Directory for seamless user access and focuses on maintaining safe internet access, especially for remote work. Organizations appreciate its ability to provide secure access while remaining invisible to users, highlighting its effectiveness in zero-trust web access and malware prevention with remote browser isolation.

Service and Support

Customers frequently praise Menlo Secure for having a very responsive and knowledgeable customer support team. Many users highlight the quick response times and the professionalism shown by the support staff. Additionally, they appreciate the effective problem-solving approach and the clear communication maintained throughout the support interactions. Overall, the dedication of the Menlo Secure team to assisting users is highly regarded.

Deployment

Users experienced a mixed setup process with Menlo Secure. Some found it straightforward and quick, reporting supportive assistance and minimal maintenance. They implemented it in phases to address departmental needs. Others faced complexity, requiring detailed meetings and ongoing support. Maintenance was described as burdensome by some, involving local IT and Menlo support. Despite differences, many users opted for gradual rollout to adapt configurations and avoid widespread issues, emphasizing care in their approach.

Scalability

Menlo Secure is seen as highly scalable due to its SaaS nature. Users mention the ability to expand quickly by obtaining licenses, accommodating rapid growth with ease. Many note its deployment capability in numerous locations worldwide, handling thousands of users effortlessly. While beneficial for gradual expansion, some suggest contacting resellers for massive user increases. Elastic cloud deployment supports its scalability, leading users to rate it highly in terms of flexibility and scalability.

Stability

Menlo Secure handles all maintenance effectively, providing continuous updates without disrupting service. Users report it as rock-solid, with stability rated around eight out of 10. Initial tuning issues were resolved after proper setup, leading to no further concerns. No major stability issues have been noted.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Menlo Secure Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Retailer

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Educational Organization

Legal Firm

Logistics Company

Performing Arts

Transportation Company

Marketing Services Firm

Construction Company

Hospitality Company

Government

Real Estate/Law Firm

Insurance Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Wholesaler/Distributor

Mining And Metals Company

Non Tech Company

Museum Or Institution

Non Profit

Pharma/Biotech Company

Recruiting/Hr Firm

University

Compare Menlo Secure with alternative products

Learn more about Menlo Secure

Menlo Security Secure Application Access makes zero trust access easy, giving users secure connectivity to private applications, including web and legacy applications. At the core of Secure Application Access is the Menlo Secure Cloud Browser, which fetches, secures and delivers the content for users.

In addition to providing simple-to-deploy, clientless ZTA, Secure Application Access and the Menlo Secure Cloud Browser protect applications from attacks such as session hijacking, cookie manipulation, and other tactics that employ protocol manipulation.

Secure Application Access protects applications from Internet threats and provides granular controls for added protection of the application and associated data. These security controls include Read-only/Read-write, Upload/download, Copy/paste, AV scanning, Sandboxing, and Data Loss Prevention.

Last Mile Data Protection

Menlo Last-Mile Data Protection identifies and prevents sensitive data from leaving your company by meticulously inspecting all file uploads and user input across browsing sessions. Leveraging the Secure Cloud Browser, users are protected from the internet and you can protect your organization from data loss with comprehensive traffic monitoring and controls. This approach addresses the growing concerns surrounding data leakage in the age of AI tools like ChatGPT.

By identifying sensitive data through file types, regular expressions, or predefined libraries, Menlo Last-Mile Data Protection empowers security teams to regulate data input into AI platforms and prevent unauthorized uploads. This capability provides crucial protection for intellectual property, PII, and other confidential information.

The solution leverages the Menlo Cloud Security Platform's visibility and control over traffic to reliably detect and prevent data leaks originating from both browser submission forms and non-browser traffic. With the ability to inspect encrypted web traffic, Menlo Last-Mile Data Protection enforces DLP policies consistently across all users and devices, ensuring comprehensive data protection.

Menlo Secure was previously known as Menlo Security Web Security, Menlo Web Security.

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Fortinet FortiGate	4.2	N/A	92%	587 interviews Add to research
iboss	4.2	N/A	94%	19 interviews Add to research

Author info	Rating	Review Summary
Head Of Bluechip Enterprise at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees	3.0	I've used Menlo Secure for two years for zero trust web access and malware prevention. It's easy to deploy, reliable, and scalable, though market awareness is low compared to larger vendors like Palo Alto and Cisco.
CISO at gsis	5.0	No summary available
Group Information Systems Security Director - CISO at Faurecia	3.5	No summary available
Chief Technology Officer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees	5.0	No summary available
VP of IT and Security at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees	5.0	No summary available

Menlo Secure Reviews

What is Menlo Secure?

Featured Menlo Secure reviews

Menlo Secure mindshare

PeerResearch reports based on Menlo Secure reviews

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

Compare Menlo Secure with alternative products

Learn more about Menlo Secure

Related questions

Product Categories

Popular Comparisons