Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] vs Cisco UCS Director comparison

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] and Cisco UCS Director are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Additionally, 87% of Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 73% of Cisco UCS Director users who would recommend it.

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Read 9 Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] reviews

87% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews

1,101 Views
1,079 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Cisco UCS Director

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] and Cisco UCS Director based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco UCS Director

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (22nd)

Featured Reviews

Zoom Tong

Director Of Technology at a non-profit with 11-50 employees

Useful features for configuring down to ports but extremely expensive

Our company uses the solution's GUI interface to configure and monitor ports. We look at usage and determine if there are any issues. Cisco is a very qualified company and has been in business for many, many years. The solution is useful because you can configure all the way down to ports. You…

Read full review

ErnieRumfield

Senior Telecommunications Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing extensive VoIP services becomes efficient and seamless

We use Cisco UCS Director primarily for managing our VoIP service to maintain seamless service delivery. We operate in an enterprise government environment Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate. It helps save time by making it quicker to roll out new call…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution includes a lot of features and is useful because you can configure all the way down to ports."

"I can define all components and create a blueprint for consumption across all services."

"The solution is agile and it has APIs for integration."

"There are workflows, automated workflows, of different tasks between different infrastructure divisions, like your VMware, your firewall, and your network."

"You can scale it easily."

"Cisco has a lot of published information and documentation that helps users understand the product and its offering very well."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"The tool is really at the center of our whole digital transformation."

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] pros

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

"The improvement for our organization has really been ease of use; we'd be a mess without the solution."

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Feature-wise, the solution helps one to add multiple environments in one place...It is a scalable product."

"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."

"I would recommend this solution to others because it simplifies a lot of tasks via orchestration."

"As usual, the technical support from Cisco is amazing."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

Cons

"Cisco can improve their product by being agnostic, not just specific to Cisco components but also supportive of other vendors."

"The improvement I would like to see is not one thing particular to CloudCenter. I'd say it's more of a message that the system is still using a lot of the different products and if they would all just fit better together, they all could be faster together."

"The tool should improve its security on the XDR part."

"The product is very expensive."

"I'm not a big fan of CloudCenter. I don't have anything against it, however, the on-premise version has been so hard to upgrade and maintain."

"They can add some of those features to make the platform more usable for different backgrounds and developer skills."

"They should provide an entire cloud offering, from architecture to network security features."

"Improvements are needed in UI and multi-tenancy for this solution."

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] cons

"There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind."

"Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

"The product's pricing needs to improve."

"The tool should be a lot more intuitive and make it easy for us to understand and migrate."

"I would like to see more flexibility when it comes to managing other stacks, like VMware virtualization."

"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"The user interface could use improvement."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is expensive."

"The tool's pricing is balanced with the market."

"The solution is extremely expensive and has additional fees for things like monitoring."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

18%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Director?

Mainly in my region and country, large data center customers are using Cisco UCS Director, not the SMB or mid-market customers. More of the on-premise customers are utilizing Cisco UCS Director. Th...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure NetApp Files vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

IBM Spectrum Computing vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

CloudStack vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 12% of the time

Abiquo vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 6% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 6% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

March 2026

Download Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

March 2026

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Also Known As

CliQr, CliQr CloudCenter

No data available

Overview

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] is utilized for tenant creation, VM management, hybrid deployment, cloud management, and port configuration.

Primary users include DevOps teams, telecom companies, and service providers. It integrates well with ACI and ASX-T, offering stability, initial setup ease, and extensive documentation. Known for high trust in Latin America, it excels in workflow automation through Action Orchestrator and supports detailed configuration down to ports. However, improvements are required in DevOps alignment, upgrades, automation, and cost management.

What are the most important features of Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]?

Stability: Provides a robust platform with minimal downtime.
Ease of Setup: Simplifies the initial setup process to get users started quickly.
Documentation: Extensive guides and resources available for user support.
Workflow Automation: Action Orchestrator enables cross-infrastructure automation.
Blueprint Pattern: Defines middleware and dependencies effectively.
API Integration: Offers agility and flexibility with API support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

High Trust Level: Recognized reliability, especially in Latin America.
Configuration Support: Capability to configure down to individual ports.
Integration: Seamless integration with ACI and ASX-T.
Agility: Enhanced flexibility and adaptability to changes.

Among its features, Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] serves industries like telecom and service providers needing hybrid deployment and cloud management. DevOps teams utilize it for tenant creation and VM management. Known for stability and initial setup ease, it supports Latin American regions highly. Action Orchestrator aids in workflow automation, benefitting user workflows. Improvements in DevOps alignment, UI, multi-tenancy, YAML abstraction, and cost management are desirable. It requires better security for XDR and comprehensive cloud offerings, including architecture and network security features.

Cisco

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Sample Customers

NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlex

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.