Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] is utilized for tenant creation, VM management, hybrid deployment, cloud management, and port configuration.
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Turbonomic | 4.4 | 6.1% | 98% | 205 interviewsAdd to research |
| VMware Aria Automation | 4.0 | N/A | 94% | 172 interviewsAdd to research |
Primary users include DevOps teams, telecom companies, and service providers. It integrates well with ACI and ASX-T, offering stability, initial setup ease, and extensive documentation. Known for high trust in Latin America, it excels in workflow automation through Action Orchestrator and supports detailed configuration down to ports. However, improvements are required in DevOps alignment, upgrades, automation, and cost management.
What are the most important features of Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]?Among its features, Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] serves industries like telecom and service providers needing hybrid deployment and cloud management. DevOps teams utilize it for tenant creation and VM management. Known for stability and initial setup ease, it supports Latin American regions highly. Action Orchestrator aids in workflow automation, benefitting user workflows. Improvements in DevOps alignment, UI, multi-tenancy, YAML abstraction, and cost management are desirable. It requires better security for XDR and comprehensive cloud offerings, including architecture and network security features.
Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] was previously known as CliQr, CliQr CloudCenter.
NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlex
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Director Of Technology at a non-profit with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | We use Cisco CloudCenter for configuring and monitoring ports through its GUI interface. While it's detailed, its benefits are limited with older switches and can be costly. We've started migrating to Ubiquiti for its affordability and intuitiveness. |
| Software Developer at FNB South Africa | 4.0 | I found CloudCenter stable and scalable, valuing its Action Orchestrator for workflow automation. However, with the product discontinued and its replacement unsuitable, we are transitioning to Resolve. Improvements are needed in language support and logging, despite overall positive customer support. |
| General Manager & Practice Lead - CMA at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I find this cloud management platform useful for blueprinting application stacks. However, it needs significant improvement in UI, multi-tenancy, and vendor agnosticism. Development seems slow, and it lacks YAML abstractions and strong public cloud support. |
| Azure IoT Developer & Solutions Architecture trainee (AZ-220) at Afrika Tikkun Services | 4.5 | I use Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] for demonstration, device provisioning, and data management, but it lacks a comprehensive cloud offering, including architecture and network security features. I haven't considered other solutions or specified a cloud provider. |
| CTO at Logicalis | 4.0 | Cisco CloudCenter is agile with integration-friendly APIs, although its XDR security needs enhancement. I didn't consider other solutions or providers. There was no specific use case or ROI indicated in the review. |
| Architecte Technologies at Intact Financial Corporation | 3.0 | I use Cisco CloudCenter for tenant management, finding it stable and scalable with a straightforward basic setup. However, I'm not a big fan due to its extremely difficult upgrades and maintenance. With it reaching end-of-life soon, I'm seeking a replacement, rating it 6/10. |
| Senior Architect Principal Infrastructure at Intact Financial Corporation | 4.0 | CloudCenter is central to our digital transformation, aiding multi-cloud application deployment and cost optimization. We appreciate its stability and excellent Cisco support, anticipating further improvements in v5 for better product integration and ACI capabilities. |
| Manager at Nirqa | 4.5 | As an implementor, I deploy Cisco cloud solutions for clients, valuing their stability, scalability, and trusted brand. While expensive with some automation gaps, good documentation aids implementation. I rate it highly for local service delivery. |
![Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/0dra2w8zbx5vrvwmhkdswx9l90ys.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/vrgt1zpi8gqi3wy9lt9smu963yx9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/4epvziunf2jcg2ysk3cw36k0q2m9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/PNT6PqoKPXw9AHMYdimfVbN9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Cisco Intersight vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/0dra2w8zbx5vrvwmhkdswx9l90ys.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Azure NetApp Files vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/d0l9qfqabzdxvnpfjyza8ogvpueo.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![CloudStack vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/hNMJJ78MbNcvroPwWE3TSr3f.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}