

Cisco Meraki MX and SonicWall NSa compete in the network security category. Cisco Meraki MX holds an advantage with its cloud-based management and ease of configuration, while SonicWall NSa offers a robust suite of security features that are particularly effective.
Features: Cisco Meraki MX excels in cloud management, allowing for easy site-to-site VPN setup, automated failover, and comprehensive security with centralized management via a cloud-based dashboard. SonicWall NSa focuses on a strong application control, extensive content filtering, and detailed intrusion detection capabilities, making it an all-in-one security solution.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki MX could enhance its detailed event logging and reporting capabilities, handle more simultaneous internet connections, and expand its offerings for advanced enterprise features. SonicWall NSa's interface and reporting tools can be improved, and more seamless integration with third-party solutions is needed according to users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki MX provides deployment flexibility across on-premises and cloud environments, and its customer service is commended for responsiveness and expertise. SonicWall NSa tends to be deployed on-premises and is straightforward but might require a more technical approach. SonicWall's customer service varies in experience among users but is generally reliable.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki MX, with its cloud capabilities, has a higher price point and a subscription-based licensing model. The ROI is often favorable due to reduced management costs. SonicWall NSa offers competitive pricing, especially for high availability configurations, providing cost-effective licensing for those requiring robust security without extensive cloud management features.
I have seen a return on investment with Cisco Meraki MX because of the time saved through cloud management.
You can eliminate some positions because it manages itself.
It greatly helps out when I am moving away from the expensive MPLS circuits or MPLS hardware.
We had budgeted about thirty lakhs, but after negotiating with SonicWall NSa, we saved almost ten lakh rupees in a year.
The support is excellent, earning a rating of ten out of ten.
Every time I got a hold of someone, I was always able to resolve my issues.
When we raise a ticket with Meraki MX, they instantly become available to support us for configurations or troubleshooting.
SonicWall support is always available to help us on an immediate basis.
The support from SonicWall was excellent.
SonicWall support is very helpful and responsive.
When you have hundreds of thousands of people it is very difficult to scale in Meraki.
The scalability of Cisco Meraki MX is rated 10 out of 10; you can scale up and scale down with no effort.
Cisco Meraki MX scales with my growing needs for my organization very well because they are easy to deploy.
I would rate its scalability around eight out of ten, meaning there are no issues, and it is pretty easy to scale.
Regarding scalability, it's important to ascertain the customer's future requirements, as firewalls need to be sized according to their expected scalability, such as moving from 500 users today to more in the coming years.
SonicWall NSa is very supportive and capable of handling everything from smaller organizations to big enterprise-level organizations on a model-wise or configuration-wise basis.
There have been no outages, no stability issues, and we have not found any vulnerabilities during security audits.
I have had zero downtime at all with Cisco Meraki MX.
I assess the stability and the reliability of Cisco Meraki MX as good, and I have experienced no downtime, crashes, or performance issues.
Configuration changes have been made that have reduced that latency.
The stability of SonicWall NSA is quite good.
It should automatically remediate and find out the issue and then resolve it on its own without interrupting the work of the employees.
Data is the only path, so optimization is essential.
An improvement would be to use Cisco Meraki MX as a software solution as well, which might reduce the cost.
More details in the analytical tools offered would be appreciated since it is not yet mature.
At those times, the CPU spikes considerably, and due to that, the firewall response becomes slow.
There are some aspects of the dashboard configuration or customization that could be improved.
I get it for $25,000, a device that can connect up to 75-100 users, whereas in Meraki MX, it goes to 75,000-80,000 per access point.
The price could be reduced by around 30% to make it more comfortable.
If Cisco can make the pricing less, customers can purchase more licenses.
SonicWall is much cheaper compared to Fortinet, particularly regarding renewal and licensing costs.
I would rate the price of the product as seven out of ten.
Meraki MX is among those top solutions in their exceptional approach towards VPN-less, Zero Trust client access to office private networks.
Advanced security is the second tier of Cisco Meraki MX. It brings you the main next-generation firewalling features such as URL filtering, advanced malware protection, and threat protection.
Cisco Meraki MX API makes it really easy for me to automate a lot of changes over several thousand devices.
Real-time deep memory inspection is very helpful and has had a positive impact on our security posture.
SonicWall NSA's most valuable features are its SD-WAN and a system RTBI that blocks all attacks.
We were the only organization that remained secure with a zero infection rate.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Meraki MX | 3.8% |
| SonicWall NSa | 1.4% |
| Other | 94.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Cisco Meraki MX offers centralized management for network security and SD-WAN, featuring advanced threat protection, VPN capabilities, and seamless integration with other Cisco products. It enhances operational efficiency through cloud management and intuitive interface.
Cisco Meraki MX is designed for ease of use with a user-friendly cloud management platform that provides real-time insights through a centralized dashboard. It includes AutoVPN for secure remote connections and advanced threat protection to ensure consistent policy enforcement. Its integration capabilities with Cisco products streamline network administration. Users highlight the need for improvements in advanced reporting, detailed alerts, and enhanced API flexibility. Cost concerns are noted, alongside desires for better security analytics and improved customer support.
What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?Cisco Meraki MX is implemented in industries like telecommunications and healthcare for secure network management and centralized control. It supports zero-touch deployment, dynamic routing, and traffic shaping, making it ideal for ISPs and multi-site environments, as well as managing Wi-Fi networks and guest security for wireless users.
SonicWall NSa stands out for its advanced security features, easy management, and cost-effectiveness, making it effective for businesses seeking robust network protection and efficient management.
Renowned for its comprehensive security mechanisms, SonicWall NSa provides a user-centric interface with enhanced VPN capabilities and content filtering. Features like deep packet inspection, application control, and site-to-site VPN ensure that it meets complex business needs. Its scalability is supported by SD-WAN functionality and unified threat management services. However, enhancements in firmware reliability, VPN scalability, and reporting tools are needed to fully optimize its potential for smaller businesses. Improved integration with AI and better threat detection will further enhance its robust security offering.
What are SonicWall NSa's most important features?In industries like education, industry, and government, SonicWall NSa plays a key role in safeguarding networks against potential cyber threats. Service providers and integrators deploy it for efficient firewalling, VPN management, bandwidth monitoring, and intrusion prevention. Its flexibility attends to needs from small businesses seeking secure internet access to large enterprises requiring thorough connectivity controls.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.