No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
2.3
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers cost-effective features appealing to businesses, with varying ROI based on usage and initial costs.
Sentiment score
3.6
Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points improve efficiency and user experience, with fewer incidents but challenging direct ROI measurement.
The maintenance windows are very low because that essentially translates to uptimes.
Principle Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
After deployment, we do not hear complaints about people not having access to needed resources.
Systems & Network Administrator At Tropical Financial Credit Union at a media company with 201-500 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.2
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN support is generally reliable, though users experience mixed accessibility and response times, prompting improvement calls.
Sentiment score
7.0
Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points receive high praise for effective support, despite minor concerns about initial contact and Cisco ID requirements.
I would rate Cisco support a 10, as the response time and process via the dashboard are easy, and response times are always within the SLA.
Independent Information Technology and Services Professional at a non-profit with 1-10 employees
It would be better if the SLA of technical support was less than four hours.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
There are some problems with their technical support when it comes to the whole Meraki system.
Senior Network Architect at Previder
On a scale of one to ten, that would definitely be a ten for the tech support.
Architect at ReBIT
I believe Cisco offers one of the best support teams available.
Chief Technology Officer at Future Point Technologies
When we ran a drill to quantify the time it takes for resolution, especially for bug fixes, it was less than one and a half to two days, which is quite impressive.
Principle Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
4.9
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides scalable solutions for diverse needs but may face challenges due to licensing and cost considerations.
Sentiment score
7.5
Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points offer scalable, easy-to-manage solutions suitable for large environments, with licensing enabling seamless expansion.
I can add devices to my inventory and assign them to a new network, and it is for the most part automated and fairly quick.
Senior Network at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Meraki is not scalable enough since it straightforwardly maps its products to segmented specifications.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
The good thing is that the functionality of the controller is the same whether you have five APs or 500.
Lead Engineer I (Network Manager) at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
There will be bandwidth deterioration, and 100 clients using the same bandwidth will impact the quality of service.
Principal Associate IT at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I rate the scalability of Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points as highly scalable at nine out of ten.
Principle Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
5.1
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is stable and reliable, handling high loads well, with minor issues during updates or peak hours.
Sentiment score
8.2
Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points are stable and reliable, though issues may occur due to external configuration or firmware updates.
Stability is not an issue for me because it comes with Cisco's proven manufacturer quality.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network.
Manager, Information Technology at a performing arts with 11-50 employees
The campus network requires stable versions for all equipment to function properly.
Security Network Architect at novonordisc
The overall performance, coverage, and signal quality are good.
Network Team Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
I have never had any stability issues with the WLAN controller.
Network Engineer at Information Technology University
 

Room For Improvement

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN faces challenges with licensing costs, technical support, scalability, security, integration, and performance improvements.
Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points need improved management, AI features, support, GUI, connectivity, license integration, and hardware quality.
The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
Some of the newer models of the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN access point have encompassed the new wireless protocols and increased the strength of their antennas.
Manager, Information Technology at a performing arts with 11-50 employees
The solution supports Wi-Fi 6.
Senior Network Architect at Previder
When we ran a drill to quantify the time it takes for resolution, especially for bug fixes, it was less than one and a half to two days, which is quite impressive, especially for bugs that were not discovered earlier and the kind of recommendations offered.
Principle Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We can take advantage of these APs where there are no controllers available on-site.
Network Architecture at Softel Consulting
The traffic analyzer is something which is quite useful.
Network Design at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers high-quality features but is considered expensive, with licensing costs being a significant concern.
Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points are considered expensive yet worthwhile for superior support, though experiences with costs and licensing vary.
The pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is not competitive enough for the SMB market compared to other brands.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is on par with other devices in that category, offering competitive pricing.
Manager, Information Technology at a performing arts with 11-50 employees
My experience with the pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is competitive with other providers offering paid subscriptions.
Independent Information Technology and Services Professional at a non-profit with 1-10 employees
If I compare that with Aruba, it is certainly at least 1.5 times more expensive.
Principle Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
I rate the price for Cisco a two, indicating a high price point.
Chief Technology Officer at Future Point Technologies
Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is an affordable solution regarding pricing.
System Engineer at Packet System Indonesia
 

Valuable Features

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN excels in ease of deployment, cloud management, robust security, remote management, and user-friendly interface.
Catalyst 9100 Access Points offer advanced security, high performance, and seamless management, suitable for both cloud and on-premises use.
It also manages security clients and switches, providing a single dashboard to manage multiple network infrastructures.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has helped optimize network traffic very effectively, as we do prioritization for streaming and web conferencing apps, resulting in a clear, visible improvement in performance.
Independent Information Technology and Services Professional at a non-profit with 1-10 employees
When I am troubleshooting wireless connections, I have access to detailed client statistics regarding disconnects, RF channel information, and other relevant data.
Senior Network at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
DNA is a tool to manage all the devices in the same network, and the DNA center, which we call DNAC, automates a lot of things through this solution to push the configuration on different devices including switches, access points, WLCs, routers, and firewalls.
Security Network Architect at novonordisc
The assurance data provides visibility and highlights the issues that a particular user or particular network node is facing.
Solution Architect at Velocis Systems
You're not buying a home access point, so it has to support 200 users per access point along with a unifying controller.
Lead Engineer I (Network Manager) at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Ranking in Wireless LAN
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
123
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Wireless 9100 Access ...
Ranking in Wireless LAN
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

DolfKrikke - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Architect at Previder
Centralized management has simplified remote branch control and improved network visibility
Cisco Meraki Wireless is very powerful and very easy to manage. The solution is also integrating Cisco Catalyst Wireless products into their portfolio, and they are managing the Catalyst switches as well. The seamless roaming capabilities function well. I monitor network performance with Meraki's real-time analytics. The most useful metrics to my team are the internet performance metrics, as there is a lot of information in the dashboard that I can access. All auditing and event logs are centralized in the dashboard. When I need to apply to compliance requirements or other regulatory needs, I can have my auditing in one place, which is an advantage. I use Cisco Meraki Wireless's Layer 7 application traffic shaping with the MX and the Meraki MX Firewalls.
Bharath _Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect at Velocis Systems
Wireless has delivered advanced analytics and remote troubleshooting for diverse use cases
Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points is valuable because of Cisco's Wi-Fi integration with Cisco Spaces, previously called DNA Spaces. When you bundle Cisco AP with Cisco Spaces, the complete wireless story comes into the picture. The first major advantage is the hardware, the chipset, the processor, and the IOS. There is unified licensing and unified iOS, and once you have DNA advantage, you can get a separate AVIX and the Wi-Fi 6 or 6E dashboard in DNAC. These advantages provide basic throughput support, OFDMA, multi-MIMO architecture, and the latest 4K QAM in Wi-Fi 7, previously 1024 QAM, and MLO in Wi-Fi 7. These functionalities exist for every OEM, but the Cisco advantage is the integration with Wi-Fi Spaces. Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points includes one AP that can operate in dual mode. You can onboard it in Meraki or Catalyst, meaning on-premises or cloud controller. Single hardware can be dual OS, either Meraki OS or Catalyst OS. For IoT and industrial wireless, Cisco has a different technology called CURV. The APs are different from the Catalyst 9000 series APs. There is a different set of series with different models working on fluid mesh architecture of Cisco CURV. Remote troubleshooting is a basic functionality of any SDN controller these days. Engineers do not need to manually log in to the end device, which could be either a switch or an AP. From DNA Center itself, you can get visibility from the assurance. You can get client 360, network 360, and application 360 where the health scores of each individual client are clearly visible in DNAC Center. The assurance data provides visibility and highlights the issues that a particular user or particular network node is facing. You can access the device without any challenge. Similar to how SD-WAN came into the picture seven to eight years ago where you could remotely log in to the WAN edge devices and troubleshoot it, the same principle is being applied in DNAC Center for the campus, whether it is switching or WAN. If the RTT latency has been met from the branch to the place where DNAC Center is deployed, you can easily access those devices without needing an engineer to visit that particular location for troubleshooting.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Marketing Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business70
Midsize Enterprise27
Large Enterprise32
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...
Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...
How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...
What needs improvement with Catalyst 9100 Access Points?
The navigation tools of the GUI could be more user-intuitive in certain areas. When trying to find a specific setting or option, it may not be in the most obvious place. This happened to me when we...
What is your primary use case for Catalyst 9100 Access Points?
I primarily use this solution for configuring access points through a centralized app and monitoring them. I create SSIDs, enable or disable them, and secure them as needed. When I came to this job...
What advice do you have for others considering Catalyst 9100 Access Points?
Since Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points integrates all components into one ecosystem, no handoff needs to occur, making the system more secure. Our most mission-critical items are hardwired, but we...
 

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN
Catalyst 9100 Access Points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.