

Tufin Orchestration Suite and Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center compete in the network security management space. Tufin has the upper hand in policy management and automation, while Cisco excels in centralized control and security visibility.
Features: Tufin provides change automation with extensive visibility and environment customization. Its policy management and compliance tools are highly valuable. Cisco offers centralized policy management with detailed intrusion event visibility and strong security intelligence.
Room for Improvement: Tufin requires better integration and cloud support. Licensing complexities and customization can be frustrating. Cisco could improve its user interface for better intuitiveness and speed in large environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tufin allows flexibility with deployment options across various environments and delivers quality technical support with some delays in complex cases. Cisco focuses on on-premises operations, providing responsive support and technical help when needed.
Pricing and ROI: Tufin is seen as expensive but comparable to competitors like AlgoSec, with licensing clarity as a concern. Cisco is costly but offers value with its advanced security features, although multiple licenses may increase overall expenses.
With Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center, we can push policies centrally to multiple devices in just a few minutes, which has significantly reduced the effort and time.
There are a lot of solutions which can provide the same features.
The Orchestration Suite saves time when implementing rules.
Cisco's documentation and knowledge base are quite strong, which helps with resolving issues without always raising a ticket.
I rate the technical support from Cisco as ten out of ten.
In recent years, they have stopped providing specialized engineering support.
The support team is effective; they connect to the network quickly and help resolve any issues that arise.
The team is eager to help in fixing issues.
It supports managing multiple devices and policies from a single console, which makes scaling operations easier.
For the 3000 new series and the 4000, we can make a cluster.
I would rate scalability capabilities as ten out of ten.
We have not faced any major outages from the platform itself.
Now Cisco has published the 120 series and the 1100 series, which support SD-WAN features in the firewall.
I remember version 6.4 had an integration with Eddie, allowing me to define a policy according to my users, however, the latest version, lacks this integration.
At times, it can feel complex, especially for new users, and navigation between different sections could be more intuitive.
The analytics features of Tufin Orchestration Suite are challenging to use and require technical expertise, which is a concern as there is not much knowledge in this field in Thailand.
Issues can arise in larger enterprises, particularly concerning policy-based forwarding and NAT traffic.
The design needs improvement, particularly in recognizing target devices and target files.
If I have only one firewall with high availability deployment, it becomes very reasonable when I purchase Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center relative to my deployment or actual need.
The initial setup cost can be significant because it involves licensing along with compatible hardware or virtual deployment.
FireMon and Skybox are considered more cost-effective.
The pricing of Orchestration Suite is high, which is a point for improvement.
Tufin and AlgoSec are at the same level in terms of pricing.
With Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center, we can manage policies from a single console, which has improved efficiency and reduced configuration errors.
I consider Talos feedback that Cisco provides as free threat intelligence to be the most valuable for me and for the operation of the security policy in my organization.
It provides full visibility of my devices, whether I have six or ten devices.
AlgoSec adds more value with its vulnerability control, which benefits organizations by reducing expenses associated with audits.
New employees can quickly grasp the various IPs, devices, and the network's logical and physical layout within a short period.
It offers automation capabilities that are very helpful, especially for network security orchestration and applying policies.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tufin Orchestration Suite | 17.3% |
| Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center | 2.8% |
| Other | 79.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 153 |
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is a robust platform with features like intrusion prevention and centralized management, enhancing security with compatibility across Cisco's ecosystem.
Designed for enterprises, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center provides advanced features like application visibility and seamless policy deployment. Its user-friendly design and extensive monitoring capabilities enable effective network management. While it excels in threat intelligence and automation, challenges remain in interface complexity, pricing, and performance. Improved API integration and enhanced user support would bolster its functionality, especially in policy management and monitoring.
What are the key features?In financial and healthcare industries, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center optimizes security operations by managing firewalls and ensuring network protection. Its deployment aids in advanced malware detection, supporting compliance with industry regulations and securing sensitive data efficiently.
Tufin Orchestration Suite offers change tracking, policy management, automation, and comprehensive visibility, aiding in secure and efficient network control. Its customization capabilities enable efficient rule analysis and optimization for multiple vendors.
With its robust capabilities, Tufin Orchestration Suite facilitates firewall policy management, automation, and compliance. Organizations benefit from its role in auditing, rule cleanup, policy standardization, and change tracking. While it provides efficient network orchestration, challenges such as dated interface design, incomplete cloud platform integration, and slow report generation demand attention. Security policy automation and vendor integration improvements are essential. Despite these issues, Tufin is crucial for managing multi-vendor environments and coordinating change management. Centralized management offers benefits in monitoring, reporting, risk assessment, role recertification, and network orchestration.
What are the key features of Tufin Orchestration Suite?In finance, Tufin integrates with existing systems to automate security policy management and ensure compliance, optimizing efficiency and risk management. In healthcare, it aids regulatory adherence and patient data protection, while in retail, it enhances security protocols amid a diverse vendor landscape.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.