

Kentik and Cisco Secure Network Analytics compete in the network analysis and security category. Kentik appears to have the upper hand in pricing and ROI due to its cost-effective solutions and significant ROI metrics.
Features: Kentik is a robust SaaS solution known for not requiring server maintenance, offering exceptional NetFlow visualization tools and a highly flexible Data Explorer. Its DDoS Alarming provides valuable network flow insights, and its API integration is a standout feature. Cisco Secure Network Analytics is strong in threat detection and analytics, integrating seamlessly with other Cisco tools. It offers comprehensive security intelligence and has the unique ability to view network traffic at the application layer.
Room for Improvement: Kentik could enhance user role granularity, improve API usability, and offer more intuitive anomaly detection features. Its interface could be refined with cost analysis tools. Cisco Secure Network Analytics could benefit from improved integration with Cisco products, a more intuitive UI, and better machine learning capabilities. It also faces challenges with setup complexity, high licensing costs, and needs for enriched user training and clearer reporting.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kentik can be deployed on-premises and in private clouds, offering outstanding technical support with swift responses and proactive customer service. Cisco Secure Network Analytics is primarily on-premises, with reliable support but noted for deployment complexity and extensive setup requirements. User reviews emphasize Kentik's user-centric focus.
Pricing and ROI: Kentik offers cost-effective licensing with significant ROI through time savings and automation. Users value its ability to optimize network costs via direct peering and reduced transit expenses. Cisco Secure Network Analytics, despite its higher pricing and complex licensing, provides comprehensive security benefits that justify the expense for some users. Kentik provides clearer ROI metrics, focusing on operational efficiency, while Cisco's significant security value is a highlight for its users.
If we had, for example, a contracted capacity from Vivo of 50 GB and we were using 40, with Kentik we reduced this usage from 40 to 20.
In production environments, especially for service providers on IP networks and data centers, Kentik helps in reducing the time to identify and resolve issues.
I believe the return on investment has been mainly time savings in performing troubleshooting.
There is a lack of adequate local support from the Indian side.
For technical support of Cisco, the support they provide depends on how the client procures it, and so far, it's understandable.
I have mostly used forums for any support needed because the setup is straightforward and the documentation is quite good.
They have monthly calls and discuss the product roadmap with us to determine what is needed.
The scope of the load balancing work was a team effort where we used three tools for load balancing.
Kentik's integration with Kubernetes makes scaling easier.
Kentik's scalability is effective; the platform can handle these large volumes.
Kentik's scalability depends on how it is contracted.
Cisco products are incredibly stable, boasting a 200% stability.
Once resolved, the system works well, and overall I think it's good.
In production, however, dimensioning of the underlying platforms is something to be mindful of.
Based on stability, I would give Kentik a nine.
I can say it is so great for us because if we configure it with Flowspec, the orchestration that we use, which is Kentik, makes the decision and automatically forwards the traffic to another position that we have in our network, or outgoing that we use.
The solution should have the ability to analyze security events not only at the network layer but also at the application and OS layers.
Proper management of the database is also important; it should be centralized for easier data collection from a single database.
More work is required to integrate AI for troubleshooting, simplifying root cause analysis, and providing suggested solutions for network issues.
It needed to be a bit easier for new users and have slightly more customized reports.
Currently, the way I'm configuring it uses reactive alerts, which means alerts are triggered when an issue occurs. I would prefer more proactive alerts in the future.
Cisco solutions are considered to be very expensive.
Regarding cost, for the Bangladesh context, Cisco Secure Network Analytics is a little bit high-priced because we are a developing country, making it tough to manage affordable solutions.
The pricing is good and aligns with the market target.
Kentik’s pricing is competitive in the marketplace.
Later, the prices are very high to maintain all the functionality blocks.
The most valuable features include encrypted traffic analytics and the ability to fulfill requirements at the network level.
Every solution is gradually integrated with AI, and Cisco has already implemented AI building features in their solution.
The best feature of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is its reliability, which I find to be the one that gets used the most.
The best features that Kentik offers are the ability to identify traffic end-to-end and to know which transit is used, if it goes through any other transit, to see the entire flow, from the subscriber to the content provider and vice versa.
This allows for better understanding of whether there is a critical ongoing case related to incoming traffic, such as a DDoS event, which is crucial for a service provider dealing with numerous customers.
Kentik has positively impacted our organization because when something happens, we use Kentik to analyze the problem and it brings us a faster solution to the problem, and the troubleshooting is clearer.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Kentik | 1.7% |
| Cisco Secure Network Analytics | 0.9% |
| Other | 97.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 52 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Cisco Secure Network Analytics enhances network security through integrated threat detection and detailed traffic visibility, optimizing performance with AI analytics and strong platform integrations.
Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers deep visibility into network traffic, with tools like network maps and server response times. Its AI-driven analytics help detect threats, focusing on east-west traffic. Integration with platforms such as pxGrid and ISE complements its capabilities. Reporting and telemetry help in identifying bandwidth issues, yet improvements are desired in AI for better data organization. Installation complexity and false positives present challenges, and managing network loads effectively is a recognized need.
What are the key features of Cisco Secure Network Analytics?Industries such as banking, defense, and police rely on Cisco Secure Network Analytics for securing networks against threats. Its capability to provide insights into encrypted traffic and facilitate device auditing makes it a sought-after choice for those requiring extensive network visibility. Users appreciate its application for threat prevention and response in demanding sectors.
Kentik provides real-time visibility into network infrastructure, focusing on monitoring, data visualization, and flow analysis to manage traffic patterns efficiently.
With robust analytics capabilities, Kentik offers insights into BGP peering status, aids in DDoS detection, and allows for detailed telemetry through its intuitive interface. The platform's SaaS nature simplifies operations by eliminating server maintenance concerns. Multi-vendor support and synthetic testing enhance network security and performance by simulating customer scenarios, while its API offers automation for querying and reporting tasks.
What are the key features of Kentik?Industries implement Kentik for network monitoring, traffic management, and flow data analysis across both on-prem and cloud setups. It proves valuable for detecting DDoS events, managing peering relationships, and optimizing costs, besides managing CDN configurations and performing synthetic tests in diverse environments.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.