HPE BladeSystem and Cisco UCS B-Series compete in the server management and data center solutions category. Cisco UCS B-Series seems to have an advantage due to its strong integration and centralized management capabilities.
Features: HPE BladeSystem is known for its iLO Remote Management, which integrates hardware management into a single interface. Its FlexFabric interconnects allow hardware consolidation and high redundancy. Cisco UCS B-Series offers centralized management through Service Profiles, enabling efficient resource allocation and seamless hardware replacement. It is recognized for its unified infrastructure platform, which facilitates strong integration and scalability.
Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem would benefit from simplifying its licensing and update processes. Improvement is needed for Cisco equipment integration due to reported failure rates. Cisco UCS B-Series could improve with a streamlined configuration interface and enhanced hardware management capabilities. Users find the setup process complex with a steep learning curve.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem offers easy deployment and efficient technical support, although complexity management can improve. Cisco UCS requires more initial setup effort but provides versatile deployment. Customer service for both is generally adequate, with some variability based on region and technical queries.
Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem provides cost-effective solutions with good ROI over time, suitable for budget-conscious enterprises. Costs encompass initial hardware and support fees, emphasizing value through efficient resource management. Cisco UCS B-Series is perceived as more costly due to initial licensing and support agreements but delivers substantial long-term savings, making it a good investment for advanced infrastructure management.
Additionally, we achieved server consolidation, running multiple services on fewer servers without purchasing new ones, resulting in significant financial benefits.
Cisco's technical support is highly helpful and responsive.
I would rate technical support from HPE as an eight on a scale from one to ten.
I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for scalability when we need to contact different vendors for quotes to find competitive offers.
The stability of Cisco UCS B-Series is impeccable, as it has been running smoothly without any need for maintenance.
I do not have to call HP support frequently, which indicates its reliability.
Last year, we faced challenges with firmware upgrades, but they were quickly resolved with assistance from Cisco TAC.
We require a centralized image that will be replicated to any other device immediately, and all configurations and everything will come as soon as possible.
To do any customization, we need to contact HP technical support, and the process is not user-friendly.
In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors.
The management software, Cisco One, is priced a bit high but still considered reasonable.
With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for scalability when we need to contact different vendors for quotes to find competitive offers.
In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors.
Its administration capabilities provide easy access to performance reports, logs, and utilization data, which are essential for effective server management.
The integration of storage and networking components within the HPE BladeSystem is quite beneficial as it is easily interoperable if we are using the same system for monitoring with the same software, which eliminates interoperability issues.
The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use.
The integration of storage and networking components within HPE BladeSystem is also good for my organization.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| HPE BladeSystem | 8.4% |
| Cisco UCS B-Series | 7.3% |
| Other | 84.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 40 |
| Large Enterprise | 104 |
Cisco UCS B-Series delivers centralized management, scalability, and integration suited for data centers. It excels in providing compute power for virtualization while ensuring minimal downtime with service profiles and consistent configurations.
The Cisco UCS B-Series platform is designed for high scalability, reliable centralized control, and efficient computing power, crucial for data centers. It integrates seamlessly with virtualization technologies like VMware ESXi, providing an intuitive interface for managing resources. However, enhancements are needed in areas such as storage integration, unified dashboard capabilities, and more responsive technical support. While appreciated for its resource management, cost-effective scalability, and reduced connectivity needs, it faces challenges with Java-based management and the validation process for storage. Organizations rely on UCS B-Series for running critical applications, database hosting, and supporting cloud workloads, despite its higher cost and needed interface improvements.
What are the key features of Cisco UCS B-Series?In industries requiring stable, scalable infrastructure, Cisco UCS B-Series is integral to managing virtualization and computing environments. It aids sectors such as finance and healthcare by supporting the virtual machines and infrastructures necessary for SAP HANA and other critical applications, contributing to effective cloud integration and server consolidation.
HPE BladeSystem provides centralized management and modular infrastructure, offering flexibility, efficiency, and high performance. Its compact and scalable design is suitable for seamless integration, enhancing connectivity while reducing downtime.
HPE BladeSystem is valued for its ability to consolidate infrastructure with reliable and scalable solutions, catering to needs across industries like telecommunications, finance, and education. Its intuitive management and robust connectivity deliver efficient management and power savings. However, improvements are needed in license registration, driver access, KVM integration, and cost effectiveness compared to competitors. Installation and software support require attention, and users seek better cloud integration.
What are HPE BladeSystem's key features?HPE BladeSystem sees implementation in sectors like finance and telecommunications, being crucial for virtualization and enterprise applications involving VMware or Hyper-V. It supports operations such as high-availability clustering and data management, effectively maintaining legacy systems and enhancing server management with integrated tools.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
