HPE BladeSystem vs HPE Synergy comparison

HPE BladeSystem and HPE Synergy compete in the server infrastructure category, with Synergy holding an advantage due to its composable infrastructure and adaptability to dynamic environments.

Features: HPE BladeSystem offers modularity, reliability, configurability, centralized management, and high performance, which are beneficial for small to mid-sized companies. HPE Synergy provides composable infrastructure, quick resource deployment, and flexible workload management with its integration with HPE OneView, addressing the needs of dynamic IT environments.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem's aging infrastructure faces challenges in managing new hardware integration and firmware compatibility, requiring enhanced centralized management and scalability. HPE Synergy could improve its integration with non-HPE hardware, streamline firmware updates, and simplify the user interface to better support users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both are primarily deployed on-premises with hybrid setups. HPE BladeSystem deploys smoothly among experienced users but has inconsistencies in customer service, especially at initial support levels. HPE Synergy eases deployment with automation features, although some find transitioning complex. Despite variations, Synergy users report more consistent support with efficient escalation handling.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem is considered expensive, but users find operational savings leading to a favorable total cost of ownership. HPE Synergy involves a high initial investment but offers compelling ROI through reduced infrastructure costs and efficient resource management, warranting its premium pricing for long-term strategic investments.