Cleo Integration Cloud Platform vs webMethods.io comparison

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of use it provides. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is a straightforward and simple product."

"WebMethods.io is a powerful tool, but it requires skilled people who can fully utilize its potential."

"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."

"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."

"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."

"We have found the pricing of the solution to be fair."

"My impression of webMethods.io's drag-and-drop interface to design workflows is actually amazing."

"​Broker and UM are the best features."

"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."

"Currently, the solution fails to provide users with additional protocol assistance and API integrations, so the aforementioned areas need to be considered for improvement."

"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."

"The Software AG Designer could be more memory-efficient or CPU-efficient so that we can use it with middle-spec hardware."

"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."

"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."

"The improvement needed is related to the model's position. As of now, it seems to be more of a conceptual idea rather than a widely implemented solution. For how long"

"I learned that the product's price is reasonable based on the interactions I had with my company's purchase team."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."

"The product is expensive."

"The solution’s pricing is too high."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"With our current licensing, it's very easy for us to scale. With our older licensing model, it was very hard. This is definitely something that I would highlight."