CloudCheckr vs Zesty comparison

Read 5 Zesty reviews

2,145 Views
1,266 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudCheckr and Zesty are competitors in the cloud management industry. Zesty has the upper hand due to its innovative features and perceived value.

Features: CloudCheckr provides comprehensive cloud management with capabilities in cost management, security, detailed billing analysis, and multi-cloud support. Zesty focuses on automatic resource usage optimization, efficiency, and cost reduction. CloudCheckr emphasizes security tools while Zesty offers advanced automation features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zesty emphasizes automation in its streamlined deployment process and is recognized for quick response times and personalized assistance in customer service. CloudCheckr, though offering robust documentation and supportive onboarding infrastructure, requires more initial configuration compared to Zesty's automation focus.

Pricing and ROI: CloudCheckr's pricing is competitive with a solid ROI from comprehensive features addressing security and compliance needs. Zesty has higher setup costs justified by its immediate impact on operational cost reduction through automation.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudCheckr vs. Zesty Report (Updated: September 2026).

Download the complete report

CloudCheckr vs. Zesty

September 2026

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Management

10th

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Cloud Services (4th), AI Observability (22nd)

Zesty

Ranking in Cloud Management

18th

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

15th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 2.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zesty is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudCheckr	2.7%
Zesty	1.0%
Other	96.3%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized cloud costs have boosted savings while reporting and user experience still need work

The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts. Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform. Additionally, from an MSP standpoint, there is good ease of deployment, especially the billing and chargeback functionality for a reseller or managed services provider. CloudCheckr has positively impacted my organization by helping us manage multiple customers and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility due to its multi-cloud support. We do not have to worry about jumping from one platform to another, and the better MSP support is beneficial from a billing and chargeback automation standpoint. The integration in compliance helps identify missing areas within our customer environments and improves them. On average, it has helped us provide approximately 15 to 20% savings through right-sizing or idle resource elimination. These are some of the immediate cost savings our customers have experienced after implementing recommendations from the tool.

Read full review

Srinivas Rayudu

Director at Zensa Technologies

Managing complex onboarding has been challenging but automated cost optimization delivers strong savings

Zesty is a good solution; however, the learning curve can be complex for new users without a solid tech background, posing a challenge in training and the initial setup process. I would deduct one point for this aspect since everything else is fine. A specific example of where the learning curve caused issues is when we introduced Zesty to our new development team, which struggled to understand the platform while working on a project related to AI and ML. Our system architects explained how Zesty works, but I believe a more proactive approach to training and foundational data could help teams be more self-sufficient and less reliant on internal support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"CloudCheckr has impacted my organization positively by making things easier and saving time, approximately three hours a week."

"If you are on AWS, you don't need to even think about it, just go ahead with using the solution because there's no better tool in that segment than CloudCheckr CMx High Security."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The only way I have to see the costs is via CloudCheckr."

More CloudCheckr pros

"From a metrics perspective, Zesty reduced our Kubernetes infrastructure spend by about 24% in the first six months, we also cut wasted storage costs by roughly 18% and improved saving plan utilization by around 12%, and on the operational side, we saved roughly 40 to 50 hours a month in manual cloud cost tuning."

"Zesty has positively impacted our organization by providing a good return on investment, with a total reported percentage of savings around 40 to 50%."

"I think Zesty is a really useful tool, it is really quick, it is really powerful, they are always improving it, and the customer service is flawless."

"One of the reasons we decided to onboard Zesty was that it started supporting Windows instances."

"The turnkey aspect of Zesty is very valuable."

Cons

"Some aspects could be made more customizable, such as the dashboard and UI."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration."

More CloudCheckr cons

"Zesty is a good solution; however, the learning curve can be complex for new users without a solid tech background, posing a challenge in training and the initial setup process."

"There are different resource types that we would like to leverage and get reserved instances for, such as RDS instances."

"I would like to get RDS-reserved instances that I could buy and sell, but that's a limitation on AWS."

"It would be really useful if Zesty had more code snippets that were easy to use, an easier library instead of their documentation, and something that provided an automated finish to insert code so it could give you code hints."

"The biggest area for improvement is still reporting depth."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing reflects that it uses custom pricing based on your cloud spend, which is pretty standard for this category. I won't pretend it's cheap, but we'...

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

The interface could be improved because it is too dense and overloaded with too many charts and too much information on each screen. Latency is also something important to take into account. The da...

What is your primary use case for CloudCheckr ?

My main use case for CloudCheckr is checking the Azure cloud costs of my SaaS service. A specific example of how I use CloudCheckr to check those Azure cloud costs with my SaaS service is that my A...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zesty?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was great, as we had a great account manager that we did not have to query too much about it. The free one was nearly good enough to start with...

What needs improvement with Zesty?

I find myself using the online editor the most often, and what would be better is if you could have multiple windows open to work in, something like an actual program rather than having to shift be...

What is your primary use case for Zesty?

My main use case for Zesty is the CMS. For our corporate website, my team uses Zesty's CMS to allow users from any point in the company to upload content, add posts, add pages, and promote the comp...

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Comparisons

Compared 4% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

Apptio Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 3% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 3% of the time

Rapid7 InsightCloudSec vs CloudCheckr

Compared 3% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Spot by Flexera vs Zesty

Compared 9% of the time

nOps vs Zesty

Compared 8% of the time

AWS Savings Plans vs Zesty

Compared 7% of the time

Apptio Cloudability vs Zesty

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs Zesty

Compared 6% of the time

More Zesty Competitors

Product Reports

Download CloudCheckr product report

CloudCheckr

September 2026

Download Zesty product report

August 2026

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

No data available

Overview

CloudCheckr offers a cohesive platform for managing cloud infrastructures with a focus on cost visibility, security, and compliance. Designed for multi-cloud environments, it provides insights and optimizations to enhance decision-making and resource efficiency.

CloudCheckr delivers thorough cloud management with features like cost analysis, security and compliance checks, and automated optimization suggestions. Its intuitive interface allows for easy deployment, supporting cost-saving measures. Users often find its cost visibility, multi-cloud integration capabilities, and granular reporting particularly beneficial. However, improvements can be made in areas such as Azure and Google Cloud integration, reporting capabilities, pricing model clarity, and UI complexity reduction.

What are CloudCheckr's key features?

Intuitive Interface: Easy navigation and deployment enhance user interaction.
Cost Visibility: Offers in-depth financial analysis and efficiency insights.
Granular Reporting: Customizable reports that provide detailed insights.
Multi-Cloud Integration: Supports various cloud platforms efficiently.
Actionable Insights: Auto-generated optimizations help reduce expenses.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost Reduction: Identifies idle resources and optimizes usage.
Resource Management: Facilitates effective allocation and governance.
Improved Security: Runs compliance checks and addresses vulnerabilities.
Managed Services: Simplifies billing and supports multi-tenant environments.

Industries using CloudCheckr benefit from enhanced cloud financial optimization and security monitoring. Managed service providers find it crucial for customer billing, while organizations leverage its multi-cloud support for maintaining compliance and governing usage. Specifically useful in sectors like finance and technology, it aids in data analysis and cost-saving strategies.

Spot - A Flexera company

Zesty offers scalable solutions that empower businesses to optimize their digital presence efficiently. Designed for dynamic online environments, Zesty integrates seamlessly, enhancing digital content management with versatile tools.

Zesty focuses on providing an adaptive content management experience for professionals seeking optimization in web content publishing. Known for its intuitive interfaces and robust architecture, Zesty allows effortless website management, content personalization, and SEO enhancements. With Zesty, businesses can efficiently curate digital content, ensuring swift loading times and superior user engagement. Its extensible features enable integration across different platforms, ensuring streamlined workflow management and enhanced data-driven decision-making.

What are the key features of Zesty?

Content Management: Easy-to-navigate CMS for efficient content updates.
SEO Tools: Built-in SEO analytics to boost online visibility.
Personalization: Customizable options for tailored content delivery.
Integration Capabilities: Links seamlessly with third-party applications.

What benefits should users consider?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined processes reduce time spent managing content.
Enhanced Visibility: Advanced SEO ensures greater reach.
Increased Engagement: Personalized content fosters user interaction.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes resources resulting in reduced operational costs.

Industries such as eCommerce, healthcare, and media have successfully implemented Zesty to streamline digital operations. For eCommerce, Zesty facilitates rapid product content updates, while healthcare sectors utilize it for managing patient information and media outlets employ it for real-time news publishing.

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Walkme, Wiz, Gong, Grubhub, Singular