Cloudify vs Snyk comparison

Cloudify and Snyk are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cloudify is ranked #40, while Snyk is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3. Cloudify holds a 1.5% mindshare in CM, compared to Snyk’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Snyk users who would recommend it.

Cloudify

Read 12 Cloudify reviews

1,730 Views
1,661 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Snyk

Read 51 Snyk reviews

29,676 Views
1,484 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cloudify

Snyk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Cloudify and Snyk operate in the tech landscape with distinct advantages. Snyk holds the upper hand due to advanced security features and seamless integration with developer workflows.

Features: Cloudify offers extensive orchestration and automation, seamless infrastructure management, and operational action capabilities. Snyk provides comprehensive vulnerability scanning, security-focused tools, and robust compliance features.

Room for Improvement: Cloudify could benefit from simplified user interfaces and better documentation. Enhancements in cost transparency and broader integration support would be advantageous. Snyk could improve by reducing initial costs and offering more customizable user settings. Providing more detailed risk assessment reports and expanding integration options would also help.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudify allows flexibility in deployments, whether on-premise or cloud-based, and offers responsive customer support for setup assistance. Snyk prioritizes developer integration ease and offers extensive support resources for quick issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudify offers a cost-effective approach with a focus on minimizing overhead through efficient management, providing notable ROI for automation-focused endeavors. Snyk's higher initial costs are offset by advanced security features that yield substantial long-term value and enhanced protection, ensuring strong ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudify vs. Snyk Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. Snyk

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudify

Ranking in Cloud Management

40th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Cloud Management

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (21st), Application Security Tools (7th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), GRC (5th), Vulnerability Management (20th), Container Security (7th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (1st), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (18th), DevSecOps (3rd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd), AI Security (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cloudify is 1.5%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 1.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Snyk	1.8%
Cloudify	1.5%
Other	96.7%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Mark Wittling

Cloud Architect at Cox communications

Works very well for advanced service chaining requirements and has extremely advanced engineers for support

We had a manager who thought that Cloudify could be used as a replacement for Horizon in OpenStack, but we found that Cloudify lacked the user interface or GUI for doing multitenancy and basic platform management tasks. Cloudify was really good at launching, for example, firewalls and configuring them and doing service chaining and rather advanced things like that, but it didn't meet the requirements for a basic platform management solution. It is something that seems to work better as a bolt-on or an augmented solution. It is a bit mis-marketed as a Cloud Management solution. It is not that. It is more of a service orchestration and automation tool. It is very good at doing that, but it fails to meet basic platform management requirements. Once you have it running, you can't really do anything with it without writing code and scripts. It requires a full-time DevOps person to use it. We deployed a Palo Alto firewall with it. That's basically what the project was for us, and it worked flawlessly once we got it finished, but it took another 12 weeks to get all of the automation and everything else coded, tested, and working. There is certainly a place for this technology, but when we got rid of OpenStack and moved to VMware, we either had to go with the vRealize Automation Suite to do this kind of automation, or we had to find an alternative solution to manage the private cloud. So, we put Cloudify in, but we really couldn't find it useful for basic platform administration tasks.

Read full review

Abhishek-Goyal

Software Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improves security posture by actively reducing critical vulnerabilities and guiding remediation

Snyk's main features include open-source vulnerability scanning, code security, container security, infrastructure as code security, risk-based prioritization, development-first integration, continuous monitoring and alerting, automation, and remediation. The best features I appreciate are the vulnerability checking, vulnerability scanning, and code security capabilities, as Snyk scans all open-source dependencies for known vulnerabilities and helps with license compliance for open-source components. Snyk integrates into IDEs, allowing issues to be caught as they appear in the code dynamically and prioritizes risk while providing remediation advice. Snyk provides actionable remediation advice on where vulnerabilities can exist and where code security is compromised, automatically scanning everything and providing timely alerts. Snyk has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture across all software repositories, resulting in fewer critical vulnerabilities, more confidence in overall product security, and faster security compliance for project clients. Snyk has helped reduce vulnerabilities significantly. Initially, the repository had 17 to 31 critical and high vulnerabilities, but Snyk has helped manage them down to just five vulnerabilities, which are now lower and not high or critical.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloudify works in cases where you have very advanced service chaining requirements; it really works well there, and it fits the best."

"Has great extendability which means you can build your own custom logic."

"Extensible internal functions and plugins. Can implement custom plugins to fit your scenario. Python based plugins."

"This is a somewhat complex solution for very complex use cases where there are multiple cloud vendors, multiple infrastructures, and multiple configurations."

"Cloudify provides the infrastructure-as-code, as well as operational action capabilities (orchestrated startups or upgrades, and more)."

"We have been able to realize ROI for our customers in the form of reduced cost, higher top line and increased valuation through improved profitability."

"It's easy to create a cloud server, such as Linux with JBoss or WebSphere, which is good for continuous deployment."

"You can use only what you need. You can remove certain Cloudify functions from the framework to create a "minified" version of what you need. This might only consist of the messaging delivery system, and the orchestration functions."

More Cloudify pros

"The solution has great features and is quite stable."

"The fact that it provides visibility, compliance-related visibility, that is not readily available by cloud suppliers themselves, is its most valuable aspect."

"The product's most valuable features are an open-source platform, remote functionality, and good pricing."

"Snyk is a good tool that provides equivalent security standards compared to other expensive tools."

"What is valuable about Snyk is its simplicity."

"Fugue provides core capabilities that enable visualization, discovery, and compliance automation."

"We went from 15 vulnerabilities in it to four or five, and those four or five were un-upgradable and we were not affected by them."

"The solution's Open Source feature gives us notifications and suggestions regarding how to address vulnerabilities."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"More of the debug functionality is needed; hopefully, we can pause during the server building process."

"Unlike the Docker environment, Cloudify takes time for configuration and its learning curve."

"It lacked the user interface for multitenancy and basic platform management tasks."

"Install of the product itself could be improved and I would like to see better event monitoring."

"We'd like to see the maturity of the plugins continue, including Amazon EMR and others."

"Cloudify is not a turn-key solution, nor designed as such."

"Certainly the UI could use some intensive work, but nevertheless, overall, it’s a complete product with its 3.4 version and much better features are available with 4.0."

"I did encounter any issues with scalability."

More Cloudify cons

"The solution's integration with JFrog Artifactory could be improved."

"There is always more work to do around managing the volume of information when you've got thousands of vulnerabilities. Trying to get those down to zero is virtually impossible, either through ignoring them all or through fixing them. That filtering or information management is always going to be something that can be improved."

"Basically the licensing costs are a little bit expensive."

"The tool needs improvement in license compliance. I would like to see the integration of better policy management in the product's future release. When it comes to the organization that I work for, there are a lot of business units since we are a group of companies. Each of these companies has its specific requirements and its own appetite for risk. This should be able to reflect in flexible policies. We need to be able to configure policies that can be adjusted later or overridden by the business unit that is using the product."

"One area where Snyk could improve is in providing developers with the line where the error occurs."

"There are some new features that we would like to see added, e.g., more visibility into library usage for the code. Something along the lines where it's doing the identification of where vulnerabilities are used, etc. This would cause them to stand out in the market as a much different platform."

"We would like to have upfront knowledge on how easy it should be to just pull in an upgraded dependency, e.g., even introduce full automation for dependencies supposed to have no impact on the business side of things. Therefore, we would like some output when you get the report with the dependencies. We want to get additional information on the expected impact of the business code that is using the dependency with the newer version. This probably won't be easy to add, but it would be helpful."

"You need to go to the tool, export it as a CSV, and then find it, which is ridiculous."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I wasn't involved in the pricing of it because we were just doing prototype work with it, but I was told by the upper management team that it was quite expensive. That was another reason we switched to Morpheus."

"The product's price is okay."

"The pricing is acceptable, especially for enterprises. I don't think it's too much of a concern for our customers. Something like $99 per user is reasonable when the stakes are high."

"It is pretty expensive. It is not a cheap product."

"Pricing-wise, it is not expensive as compared to other tools. If you have a couple of licenses, you can scan a certain number of projects. It just needs to be attached to them."

"Compared to Veracode, Snyk is definitely a cheaper tool."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"We are using the open-source version for the scans."

"It's inexpensive and easy to license. It comes in standard package sizing, which is straightforward. This information is publicly found on their website."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Snyk?

I use Snyk ( /products/snyk-reviews ) in the DevOps pipeline to identify vulnerabilities before deploying the application. It integrates with Jenkins ( /products/jenkins-reviews ).

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Cloudify

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat CloudForms vs Cloudify

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudify

Compared 8% of the time

Tieto OneCloud vs Cloudify

Compared 6% of the time

CloudBolt vs Cloudify

Compared 5% of the time

More Cloudify Competitors

SonarQube vs Snyk

Compared 7% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 2% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs Snyk

Compared 2% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 2% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Snyk

Compared 2% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify

June 2026

Download Cloudify product report

Buyer's Guide

Snyk

May 2026

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fugue, Snyk AppRisk

Overview

Cloudify offers seamless orchestration and infrastructure deployment across major cloud platforms such as AWS, Azure, and VMware. Its TOSCA-based standard provides flexibility and integration capabilities, making it an effective tool for multi-cloud operations and infrastructure-as-code management.

Cloudify's robust orchestration abilities are complemented by its ability to support major cloud providers and its ease of use in following templates. The extensibility through custom logic and plugins facilitates orchestrated startups, multi-cloud deployments, service chaining, and operational actions. Despite its strengths, users face challenges such as complex debugging, a steep learning curve when compared to Docker, and limited multitenancy features. There's a need for improvements in installation, event monitoring, error handling, simplified upgrades, and better plugin robustness. Connectivity issues, mobile app integration, and broader operating system support remain areas for development.

What are Cloudify's most important features?

Support for Major Cloud Providers: Integrates with AWS, Azure, VMware for streamlined deployments.
Template Following: Simplifies deploying infrastructure using standardized templates.
Orchestration Abilities: Manages complex operations efficiently across platforms.
Extensibility: Supports custom logic and plugins for specific requirements.
Infrastructure-as-Code: Provides high availability and easy management.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Flexibility: Enhances the ability to deploy across different cloud platforms.
Integration: Facilitates seamless orchestration and management of resources.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces deployment time and simplifies workflows.
Cost Reduction: Optimizes resources and minimizes redundant processes.
Customizability: Tailors deployments with custom logic to meet specific needs.

In industries like telecom, edge computing, and networking, Cloudify is essential for orchestrating complex deployments and infrastructure management. Organizations leverage its capabilities for CI/CD processes, system testing, and NVF-related tasks. It enables the deployment of REST applications, virtual machines, and private clouds using technologies like Tomcat, SaltStack, Kubernetes, and OpenStack, while communicating effectively with tools such as ServiceNow, PowerShell, Python, and PSQL.

Cloudify

Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.

Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.

What are Snyk's standout features?

Simplicity and Integration: Easy to integrate across platforms like GitLab, GitHub, and Jira.
Comprehensive Vulnerability Database: Offers accurate reporting for effective vulnerability management.
Developer-Friendly Design: Supports multiple programming languages, appealing to developers.
Automation and Flexibility: Enhances workflow efficiency with automated capabilities.

What benefits can users expect?

Efficiency in Vulnerability Detection: Streamlines prioritization and remediation processes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a competitive pricing model compared to alternatives.
Enhanced Workflow: Integration with DevOps tools improves development processes.

Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.

Snyk

Sample Customers

Proximus Partner Communications (Israel) VMware NTT Data Metaswitch Spirent Communications Lumina Networks Atos Fortinet

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. Snyk

June 2026

Free Report: Cloudify vs. Snyk

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudify vs. Snyk and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudify vs. Snyk report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.