No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudSense vs Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudSense
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
13th
Ranking in Contract Management Software
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Conga Contract Lifecycle Ma...
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
4th
Ranking in Contract Management Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Contract Management Software category, the mindshare of CloudSense is 1.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is 3.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Contract Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)3.9%
CloudSense1.4%
Other94.7%
Contract Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Use CloudSense?
Leave a review
Sakshi Thakur - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Automation has transformed complex contract lifecycles and now supports high-volume workflows
The only drawback of Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it does not work for small-scale business areas because I have implemented it for one customer with four or five pages of templates and three to four record types. For that small business, Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) does not work well because it is a bit complicated. Sometimes all customers need is a click of a button to go in and do things, and Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is a bit complicated for such kinds of businesses. There are definitely areas where Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be easier to use for smaller businesses, particularly making processes more streamlined and user-friendly.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contract Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
From my experience, the pricing and licensing for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) feel more in line with an enterprise-level investment. It is not the cheapest solution, but it aligns wit...
What needs improvement with Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
Regarding what I would improve in Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), from my technical understanding, there is improvement criteria everywhere, but currently, we can achieve whatever we wan...
What is your primary use case for Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)?
In our current project, we use Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) as a pricing model, and it is quite effective. It is helpful for us, similar to CPQ, as it redirects pricing to the CPQ from...
 

Also Known As

No data available
The Apttus Intelligent Cloud, Conga CLM AI
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

British Gas, O2 Telefonica, Financial Times, Telefonica, Easynet, CoreSite, EDF Luminus, Ziggo, Factory Media, EE, Interxion
Akamai Technologies, Axis Stars, BlackBaud, Cadence, Ceridian, Citrix