No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Coalesce.io vs Treasure Data comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Coalesce.io
Ranking in Data Warehouse
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
3.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Treasure Data
Ranking in Data Warehouse
25th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Customer Data Platforms (CDP) (9th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (76th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Coalesce.io is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Treasure Data is 1.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Coalesce.io1.0%
Treasure Data1.7%
Other97.3%
Data Warehouse
 

Featured Reviews

Kunal Shah - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Business Intelligence Developer at VodafoneZiggo
Standardized ELT templates have accelerated delivery while API and UI flexibility still need improvement
The best features Coalesce.io offers in my experience include lineage, which is the most important from the Ziggo perspective, and the APIs, which I would rank as the second most valuable. The third feature is the bulk edit option, so we don't have to do repetitive tasks again and again. The new SQL feature they are introducing, where you can dump your SQL and have your table or view created without manually creating columns, is also valuable. These are the four features I appreciate the most, and the fifth one would be the recently implemented GUI change where you can put a node in a spotlight to see the upstream and downstream based on what you need, setting up the depth and those settings. Coalesce.io has positively impacted my organization by reducing our development time and the time to market from around 15 days to a couple of days. This is the biggest impact we have experienced, and we are able to enforce a standardized way of working among developers, eliminating silos or customized solutions that developers create for themselves. If a satellite is loaded by ten different processes, all ten different processes generate the same type of SQL, making it easier to debug later if someone new joins the team. Additionally, since it is a SaaS solution, there is no need to maintain any software or install anything on laptops, which has helped us at VodafoneZiggo. Another feature is the API feature and the CLI command tool, which aid us significantly in moving from PowerCenter to Coalesce, enabling the migration of mappings from PowerCenter to Coalesce in bulk.
DEEPAK SINGH THAKUR - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at Indegene
Users can effortlessly create tables and manage data, even without utilizing the graphical interface
The initial setup is difficult due to the lack of detailed documentation. While the documentation provides a high-level overview, it lacks the specific instructions needed for setup. We relied on assistance from the Treasure Data team, including their support team, to navigate the process. Additionally, various policies to consider further complicate the setup, which ultimately requires time. We handle a large volume of data, and ensuring everything runs smoothly is crucial. Previously, it would take three to four months for one deployment due to the need to create workflows, conduct functional and comprehensive testing to ensure everything works seamlessly, and then proceed with delivery.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
906,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
29%
Construction Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
25%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Coalesce.io?
Coalesce.io can be improved by making it handle more edge cases and providing better documentation. When I was initially working and trying to find information, there was not much available on thei...
What is your primary use case for Coalesce.io?
My main use case for Coalesce.io was with a healthcare provider client whose team was not particularly tech savvy, so we wanted something easy to use. I was debating between two options: Coalesce.i...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Pioneer, Dentsu, Diverse, Albert, Retty, FreakOut, Mobfox, Pebble, Livesense, GREE, Cookpad, Dashbid, Cloud9, Just Premium
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Teradata, Oracle and others in Data Warehouse. Updated: July 2026.
906,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.