Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Codename One vs PhoneGap [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Codename One
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Platforms (7th)
PhoneGap [EOL]
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

it_user480888 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chicken Little at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Uses standard Java, with low rewrite requirement for existing applications.
Uses standard Java, with low rewrite requirement for existing applications I ported a couple of large-ish real world Java applications, and maintained a common code base. Future development continues, fully cross platform, on standard desktop Java, Android and iOS. Core Java features are not…
it_user996 - PeerSpot reviewer
Anonymous User at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Product review for PhoneGap
The product makes it easy to start developing cross-platform HTML5-based applications for iPhone, Android and Windows Phone based devices. It leverages developers' existing HTML and javascript skills and uses a familiar paradigm to expose additional functionality (such as camera or location…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"A few things that stand out to me are a well-documented and pretty extensive API, build server, access to native functionality via native interface, easy extension with third-party libraries, active developer support, and attractive pricing."
"Uses standard Java, with low rewrite requirement for existing applications."
"To the best of my knowledge CN1 is better than some of the available mobile app development frameworks such as Xamarin and Nativescript because it gives almost 100% -- if not 100% -- write once run anywhere."
"For me, PhoneGap happens to be quite useful as I can share my existing code (javascript code) on different platforms, and I therefore do not have to do the same thing on different platforms."
"The product makes it easy to start developing cross-platform HTML5-based applications for iPhone, Android and Windows Phone based devices."
 

Cons

"Core Java features are not fully supported (introspection, serialization) and many standard functionalities (windows, events) are implemented in an idiosyncratic way, not standard Java."
"Testing through a CLI simulator is free but difficult to setup."
"Windows Phone port. However, that is actively being improved and should be released later this year if all goes well."
"Because it's a generic platform, it doesn't fully leverage all the subtleties of some of the platforms it runs on."
"Performance is not good, especially if the application is loaded with graphics."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

No data available
nitobi
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pmovil, Chemetall Italia SRL, BOi Global Group
Habanero Consulting Group, Blue Raster
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Google, Apple and others in Mobile App Platforms. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.