CodeSonar vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Why PeerSpot?

AdaCore and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. AdaCore is ranked #35, while PortSwigger is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.3. AdaCore holds a 1.0% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of AdaCore users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

4,129 Views
2,849 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 65 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

15,539 Views
9,168 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and CodeSonar compete in the field of security testing and static code analysis. Burp Suite showcases greater flexibility and versatility, while CodeSonar offers a robust approach to vulnerability detection.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers excellent web security testing, automation features, and customizable testing processes. CodeSonar stands out with static code analysis, advanced vulnerability detection, and suitability for complex software systems.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest enhancing Burp Suite's performance speed and efficiency for large-scale scans. CodeSonar needs better user accessibility, improved tool integration, and quicker technical support. Burp Suite's real-time interaction is an added area for future improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is noted for easy setup and responsive support. CodeSonar requires more technical expertise for deployment, and while support is reliable, users desire quicker response times and more detailed assistance.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is valued for cost-effectiveness and short-term ROI in web security testing. CodeSonar demands a larger investment but offers significant long-term security benefits, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive code analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Application Security Tools

35th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (10th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 3.3%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional	3.3%
CodeSonar	1.0%
Other	95.7%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Moti Huberman

Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks

I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"I would suggest trying out automated tools along with CodeSonar on your project, and you will find out that CodeSonar reports many more defects compared to other static analysis tools, so this is a very important tool."

"It has helped us a lot with some issues and has helped us avoid bad code."

"It has been able to scale."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"CodeSonar has helped our organization because it detects dead and nonusable parts of code to create a more optimized code."

"The solution is very stable and we have used it for a long time with no issues."

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times."

More CodeSonar pros

"It's good testing software."

"We are mostly using it for scanning the entire website. So, we basically create a script with the entire website and then run it for different injections."

"The technical support from PortSwigger is excellent, managing response time and quality efficiently without any issues."

"The Spider is the most useful feature. It helps to analyze the entire web application, and it finds all the passes and offers an automated identification of security issues."

"It helps in API testing, where manual intervention was previously necessary for each payload."

"I personally love its capability to automatically and accurately detect vulnerabilities. So, I would say it is the Burp scanner that is THE most powerful, valuable, and an awesome feature."

"This is a standard tool in this industry and anybody who is doing application security testing should be aware of it."

"Unearthing these issues really helps me build confidence and relationships with clients on two counts."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"It was difficult for us to apply a rule, especially to a part of the code, and not apply it to the rest of the code."

"The MISRA guidelines were not appropriately reported and there were some flags or errors."

"It was expensive."

More CodeSonar cons

"The initial setup was somewhat complex, to be honest."

"I would like to see a more optimized solution, as it currently uses a lot of CPU power and memory."

"The Iran market does not have after-sales support. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional needs to provide after-sales support."

"I would like to see the return of the spider mechanism instead of the crawling feature. Burp Suite's earlier version 1.7 had an excellent spider option, and it would be beneficial if Burp incorporated those features into the current version. The crawling techniques used in the current version are not as efficient as those used in earlier versions."

"In the Professional version, we cannot link it with the CI/CD process."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"Integration is a big problem."

"The number of false positives needs to be reduced on the solution."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"This solution requires a license. It is expensive but you receive a lot of functionality for the price."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."

"There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable."

"They should reduce the license cost a little bit. It is $400 per user, and it would be better if they could reduce the licensing fee."

"The pricing of the solution is cost-effective and is best suited for small and medium-sized businesses."

"The solution used to be expensive. However, they have reduced the price to approximately $400.00 which is reasonable."

"We are using the community version, which is free."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs CodeSonar

Compared 11% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Coverity Static vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Veracode vs CodeSonar

Compared 6% of the time

Understand vs CodeSonar

Compared 5% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 22% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

Software Risk Manager ASPM vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 4% of the time

SonarQube vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 4% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2026

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

October 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

No data available

Burp

Overview

CodeSonar offers a potent tool for static code analysis, adept in detecting runtime errors and security vulnerabilities, with a fast deployment process and scalable capabilities. Its quick analysis and efficient web interface provide a strong basis for code quality validation.

CodeSonar specializes in identifying runtime errors, dead code, and security threats while providing features like code surfing and browsing. It offers a highly efficient web interface, though users find initial setup complex and highlight the need for better static analysis, broader language support beyond C and C++, and an improved licensing model. Despite these challenges, its integration with Jenkins and technical guidance support makes it a reliable choice for teams in defense and software quality assessment. Deployment is quick and easy, yet initial costs are a common concern among users.

What are the key features of CodeSonar?

Quick Analysis: Delivers fast runtime error detection and reporting.
GUI Interface: Offers a user-friendly experience for code browsing.
Scalability: Efficiently deploys across various environments.
Security and Code Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities and potential bugs.
Effective Configuration: Simplified log and analysis configuration.

What benefits can be seen in user reviews?

Detection of Code Vulnerabilities: Enhances security with robust threat detection.
Process Integration: Seamlessly integrates with DevOps tools such as Jenkins.
Scalable Deployment: Quickly adaptable in expanding environments.
GUI Usability: Highly efficient for technical teams to navigate.

CodeSonar is primarily implemented in industries like defense and companies prioritizing code quality. Teams utilize its static code analysis and threat detection capabilities, integrating with Jenkins for continuous integration workflows. Security checks post-builds and technical support are common, aiding in effective defect management.

AdaCore

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a vital tool for cybersecurity experts, valued for features like Intruder and Repeater, and offering strong automation for effective vulnerability detection and web security.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional aids organizations in conducting comprehensive application security testing. With functions like scanning, proxy setup, and numerous plugins, it provides essential support for vulnerability assessments and penetration testing. Despite needing improvements in reporting, false positive reduction, and scanning speed, it remains adaptable for different security operations through its automation, extensive community support, and regular updates. Licensing and pricing flexibility are considerations, alongside API security enhancements and documentation improvements. Widely used for intercepting and scanning web applications pre-launch, it supports compliance testing while offering tools for request replaying, traffic manipulation, and brute forcing.

What are the key features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

Intruder: Automates attacks to test web application vulnerabilities.
Repeater: Lets users send modified requests to observe responses.
Extender: Supports additional functionalities through plugins.
API Support: Offers capabilities for automated workflows and integrations.
Vulnerability Scanner: Efficiently detects application security flaws.

What benefits should users consider?

Affordable Pricing: Offers value through cost-effective plans.
Community Support: Access a robust network for troubleshooting and advice.
Automation Capabilities: Streamlines security testing processes.
Regular Updates: Continuous improvements and feature developments.

In industries like finance and healthcare, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is implemented to enhance application security frameworks. It provides critical insights for regulatory compliance and risk management. The tool's adaptability supports organizations in routinely identifying and addressing vulnerabilities, ensuring robust protection against potential threats and facilitating secure application launches.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

November 2026

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.