Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ comparison

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

38th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

50th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection	0.4%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	0.8%
Other	98.8%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

MehulSharma

CEO at SD GROUP

A cloud solution for endpoint security with DLP

We shared a datasheet with the customer. The customer mentioned that MDM or DLP is included in the product, but she cannot utilize these features in AP Protection, even though they are mentioned in the datasheet. This creates an issue recommending the product to the customer since she cannot use these features. Therefore, when updating your datasheet, clarifying which features apply to the customer's product use is crucial. This clarity is beneficial for both parties. I provide the solution on-premises, but we conduct the POC on the Azure platform. Additionally, we are partners with both Microsoft and AWS. This enables us to offer the AWS and Azure platforms, whichever the customer prefers. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is its ability to provide ransomware protection."

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection allows our organization's clients to be managed and inventoried remotely."

"Containment is the best feature of the solution."

"It's a very easy-to-use product."

"If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well."

"Auto Containment is a valuable feature."

"The big advantage is that it has a sandbox if something bad comes into it."

"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pros

"It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources."

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"Valuable features include good scanning, very light footprint and management console that the client can access and (just as important) in which I can see status of groups of computers (I am a consultant, IT role)."

"Their policy management, their cloud-based dashboard and user interface are very easy to navigate."

"It is excellent endpoint protection for mobiles that does everything it says it will."

"The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients."

"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."

"I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows."

"The menu could be cleaned up."

"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."

"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."

"Support could be improved. Sometimes it is difficult to find exact solutions, and people occasionally get stuck, resulting in delayed responses."

"They need to enhance the performance of the agents. Currently, the performance is going low when the agent starts a full scan. The agent is consuming a lot of resources while scanning. When there are a lot of documents to check, it slows down the endpoint. This is the only thing that worries me about Comodo, but this issue is also there in other products. It is missing DLP, and I know that they are working on adding some data loss prevention capabilities. They have added some capabilities, but these capabilities are not yet mature. I hope they will enhance these capabilities because it is important to prevent the data from going out from inside. We are protected from the outside, but we also have to be protected from the inside out."

"There are a few minor issues such as package updates and passwords."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection cons

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."

"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."

"It needs to improve the problems with the faster connection, and have a huge reduction in false positives."

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"They should provide more information on the type of cyber attacks."

"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."

"Their customer support should be better. We started having some issues with it, and we didn't get the required support."

"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Comodo’s pricing a four out of ten."

"The price of this product should be lower."

"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The product can be considered fairly cheap."

"The tool's pricing is not very expensive and falls within the market price. The solution's licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The product is very reasonably priced."

"It's a cost-effective solution"

"It was about 35 or 40 bucks per year for the endpoint."

"The product is pricey."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"It is relatively cheap."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"Work on a price tier plan."

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Auto Containment is a valuable feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.

What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

There are not many disadvantages, but they need to do some work on DLP integration. Support could be improved. Sometimes it is difficult to find exact solutions, and people occasionally get stuck, ...

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Comparisons

Compared 30% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 20% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection product report

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection report

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Also Known As

Comodo AEP

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Overview

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

Xcitium

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties

Mytech Partners

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection