Control-M and Globalscape EFT are significant contenders in the enterprise IT solutions category, focusing on automation and file transfer management respectively. While both offer robust features, Control-M appears to have a competitive edge due to its extensive integration capabilities, which provide a comprehensive and centralized enterprise oversight.
Features: Control-M offers extensive integration capabilities with various applications, complex scheduling features, a robust automation capability, cross-platform job management, and an intuitive GUI for enterprise oversight. BMC Control-M supports high availability, helping to streamline workflow management. In contrast, Globalscape EFT is focused on ensuring secure file transfers with strong security protocols and encryption options, a centralized platform for handling these transfers, and advanced compliance controls.
Room for Improvement: Control-M users suggest improvements in output analysis flexibility, reporting functionality, and version compatibility. Enhancements in ease of use and modernization of the reporting module are also desirable, along with a streamlined licensing model. For Globalscape EFT, handling large volumes more efficiently, adding user-friendly folder monitoring services, and a web-based admin panel could boost user satisfaction.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M provides flexible deployment options, including on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud, meeting diverse infrastructure preferences. Its customer service is generally well-regarded for reliability, with some noted areas needing better documentation and responsiveness. Globalscape EFT mainly offers on-premises and cloud platform deployment, with technical support being cooperative despite some issues in accessing advanced support levels. Control-M's broader deployment flexibility stands out, although both have strong support records.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is perceived as a high-cost solution but delivers sound ROI through its comprehensive features and automation capabilities, particularly for large enterprises enhancing operational efficiency. Globalscape EFT stands out for its competitive pricing, offering substantial value with robust security features and ease of management, making it attractive for smaller-scale implementations focusing on security and file transfer.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
It has custom reports which are inbuilt, showing things such as how many files are going through, what the file sizes are, and if any invalid logins have happened.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
If something fails at 3 AM in the morning, you need to fix it and get it back up and working really quickly.
A quicker response would be appreciated.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
Once properly implemented, the system becomes very stable, which is one of its strongest attributes.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
There should be an automation system for developers to set it up more easily and quickly.
What they've done about scheduling, other people are still trying to figure out.
If I'm transferring large batches, it takes them in threads. Globalscape EFT uploads the files on a threading basis, such as 100 files at a time, and the rest of the files will be in a queue system.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.
The best cell phone will always be more expensive.
It operates as a pay-as-you-go model.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.
Control-M by BMC offers orchestration for hybrid cloud workflows, starting at $29,000 annually. It's designed for teams managing dependencies efficiently with automation and scheduling capabilities.
Control-M is known for its automation, integration, and scheduling capabilities. It provides a user-friendly GUI for seamless third-party application integration and robust file transfer capabilities. Role-based administration features, self-service portals, and the ability to handle complex workflows enhance operational efficiency. Its control modules enable diverse integrations, while forecasting, monitoring, and alerting functionalities improve reliability and adaptability across platforms, making it essential for orchestrating tasks efficiently.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is vital in industries like financial services, data management, and IT operations. It automates batch processing, job automation, and file transfers, supporting applications such as SAP, Oracle, and Informatica. This enhances transparency, reduces errors, and provides insights into job performance and system status.
Globalscape EFT, a robust file transfer platform, offers ease of setup, strong security, and user-friendly automation features suitable for secure data exchange across Windows and Linux environments.
Globalscape EFT supports centralized management, strong security protocols, and simplified automation, making it an ideal choice for businesses requiring secure file transfers. It integrates seamlessly with Active Directory and provides advanced features like PGP encryption, API support, and compliance controls. Users appreciate its efficient setup process, graphical interface, and reliable customer service. However, there is a need for enhancements in cloud capabilities, faster file transfers, and a transition to a web-based admin. Challenges include folder monitoring, concurrent use issues, and complex upgrades in high-availability environments. Users seek improved alert systems and reporting capabilities.
What are the most important features?Industries rely on Globalscape EFT for secure file exchanges, SFTP storage, and file encryption, integrating it with diverse systems for custom automation. Common uses include internal/external file transfers, compliance reporting, and secure communications across regions. It's implemented in both on-prem and cloud settings, maintaining managed file transmissions for multiple sites.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
