Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Coupa Invoice vs IBM Maximo comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Coupa Invoice
Ranking in Billing Software
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Maximo
Ranking in Billing Software
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Billing Software category, the mindshare of Coupa Invoice is 2.9%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Maximo is 4.5%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Billing Software
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1871577 - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrates seamlessly, is simple to install, and has responsive internal technical support
It comes in three sizes: small, medium, and large. There is no problem with scalability or thresholds. It holds up. We have slightly more than 3,000 users globally. The users are everywhere spanning from sales, product development, cost management, professional services, support, and value management are all covered. In my opinion, it's a 100% uptake. There is no second solution. If you don't utilize it you can't do your job.
Jose Pedro Muñoz - PeerSpot reviewer
A very strong and powerful tool in the market preferred by a variety of industries
I rate the technical support a seven out of ten. Three levels of support in IBM. The first one is a fixed level, while levels two and three are very good. Here, level one is not very good, as it takes time to go from level one to level two and from level two to level three. So, level one is of low capacity.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the user interface, which is extremely simple and very modern compared to other similar software available."
"Preventive maintenance management."
"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"IBM Maximo is a very strong and powerful tool in the market…Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The large range of configurability of the product is great, since everyone has a different way of doing things."
"The incident management feature is good because it allows you to keep track of and classify issues."
"We can manage, organize, and track incidents, claims, jobs, tasks, preventive and corrective maintenance, locations, and assets."
"It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world."
"The ability to configure and integrate it with other solutions for ERP."
 

Cons

"Pricing and partner support could be improved."
"​Maximo is a big system, so the initial setup is complex."
"The mobile solution has a lot of room for improvement, especially in geopositioning capabilities, tracking capabilities, and configuration capabilities, in order to let the tech operate online and offline.​"
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"Areas for improvement include: an enhanced Service Catalog on Mobile; Agent intelligence; better dashboards for KPIs."
"Initial setup is a longer process because Maximo is bigger and has more processes."
"The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support."
"It's not user-friendly. It could use shortcuts for frequently requested services."
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not. Sometimes it crashes or becomes very slow, and there are times we are not even able to download all the databases. Without the database, we cannot work on that application. These are the small glitches, and stability issues we are facing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"According to what I've heard and understood, it's on the pricey side."
"The price of IBM Maximo could reduce, it is expensive."
"I do not know about the price of the solution. However, this has been an expensive project overall."
"The concurrent user license is much more effective in management and cost-wise, as it is more suitable for maintenance management."
"You pay for what you get. There are lots of options depending on how you would like to implement Maximo."
"Explore the possibility of using DB2. You will avoid the cost of SQL Server or Oracle licenses."
"IBM has changed the licensing policy. As I understand now, they are going from a complex way of licensing to a more simple way of licensing."
"IBM Maximo offers a licensing application, and you have to comply with the license."
"Where available, concurrent licenses can be more cost efficient and provide more flexibility."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Billing Software solutions are best for your needs.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Media Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Maximo
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sanofi, Alder Biopharmaceuticals, Amerinet, Armstrong Worldwide Industries, Auction.com, FirstMerit Bank, Grass Valley, Intermedia, NEC, NPL, ON24, Pandora, SCI, CSAA Insurance Group, World Vision
Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast
Find out what your peers are saying about Zuora, Intuit, NetSuite and others in Billing Software. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.