Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs Zabbix comparison

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 108 Zabbix reviews

24,755 Views
5,199 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Zabbix and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management (CEPAM) offer distinct solutions in performance monitoring. CEPAM appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and superior customer service, despite Zabbix's strong points in affordability and comprehensive support.

Features: Zabbix users value its extensive monitoring capabilities, ease of integration, and customizable alerts. CEPAM offers robust analytics, real-time data processing, and scalability. While Zabbix's features are impressive, the advanced analytics and scalability of CEPAM give it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix needs enhancements in scalability, user experience, and documentation. CEPAM users suggest improvements in documentation, cost management, and user interface. Both products have specific areas for growth, but Zabbix's scalability issues are particularly significant.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix users find it fairly straightforward to deploy but highlight the need for improved customer service. CEPAM is appreciated for its smooth deployment process and excellent customer service, making it more appealing in those areas.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix is praised for its low setup costs and quick ROI. CEPAM, despite higher initial costs, offers significant long-term ROI due to its advanced features. Users find Zabbix more cost-effective initially, but CEPAM's long-term benefits justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: March 2026).

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

50th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zabbix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

108

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (1st), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 2.3%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zabbix	2.3%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	97.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

KamranBhatti

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Helps reduce response time but has room to improve customization complexity

We are not working on simple standalone solutions like Kaspersky DDoS Protection or Hybrid Cloud Security. Once you understand Zabbix, then it is easy to customize those web pages and graphs for our customer use. It is fully automated to your requirements. Zabbix is working fine with no issues, and I am satisfied with it. We have combined Zabbix and SolarWinds. The integration works fine, and it is easy to integrate Zabbix with the IT environment. We were trying to purchase MDR (Managed Detection and Response), but we are not working on that. I don't have real experience with MDR. We are using Falcon software for that. We are working with Falcon Complete, not with Sandbox. We are not using Kaspersky for business or cloud protection. For that, we are using Zabbix CrowdStrike Falcon Complete solution. I have given this review an overall rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

"There is a problems page that shows us every warning or problem that occurs on our VMs globally. The map screen is also really useful because this is something that was missing. I don't know every other tool in the market. So, I don't know if this is a good point of only Zabbix, or other tools are also doing it, but from my point of view, this is the most useful page that I use, along with the problems page that efficiently lists the problem, recovery time, ending hours, starting hours, and so on."

"We have found that Zabbix is more easy to use than other applications."

"I use the solution to provide a perfect environment for remote connectivity with my clients."

"It's one of the best products available."

"The most valuable feature is the support for monitoring Cisco switches."

"Health and communication links availability."

"The pricing of the product is reasonable."

"The initial setup was not complex."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"The capacity planning feature and SLA monitoring need to be improved."

"Look and feel."

"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."

"The user interface could be a bit better. They could update it a bit."

"The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts."

"For us, the initial setup was complex"

"The System Center Operations Manager can be improved."

"Zabbix isn't very good at automation just yet."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

"It’s free of cost."

"The product is an open source and free solution."

"I was using the free, Community Edition."

"This is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"Zabbix is free but if you use it in production then you have to pay for it."

"My manager is very happy because it doesn't cost anything."

"This solution is completely open-source, so it is quite affordable."

"It is free, which allows us to reduce costs."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I think Zabbix is economical, whereas SolarWinds is expensive. SolarWinds has a lot of secure features, but Zabbix is providing everything free of cost. Zabbix is economical, and you can install it...

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts. I think Zabbix needs to improve the customization better. At present, I am satisfied with the functionality ...

eG Enterprise vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Comparisons

Compared 41% of the time

More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Competitors

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 6% of the time

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 5% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 3% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 3% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Download Zabbix product report

February 2026

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba