Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs Zabbix comparison

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 108 Zabbix reviews

23,563 Views
4,948 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Zabbix and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management (CEPAM) offer distinct solutions in performance monitoring. CEPAM appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and superior customer service, despite Zabbix's strong points in affordability and comprehensive support.

Features: Zabbix users value its extensive monitoring capabilities, ease of integration, and customizable alerts. CEPAM offers robust analytics, real-time data processing, and scalability. While Zabbix's features are impressive, the advanced analytics and scalability of CEPAM give it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix needs enhancements in scalability, user experience, and documentation. CEPAM users suggest improvements in documentation, cost management, and user interface. Both products have specific areas for growth, but Zabbix's scalability issues are particularly significant.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix users find it fairly straightforward to deploy but highlight the need for improved customer service. CEPAM is appreciated for its smooth deployment process and excellent customer service, making it more appealing in those areas.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix is praised for its low setup costs and quick ROI. CEPAM, despite higher initial costs, offers significant long-term ROI due to its advanced features. Users find Zabbix more cost-effective initially, but CEPAM's long-term benefits justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: December 2025).

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Zabbix

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

49th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zabbix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

108

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (1st), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 2.5%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zabbix	2.5%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	97.1%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

KamranBhatti

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Helps reduce response time but has room to improve customization complexity

We are not working on simple standalone solutions like Kaspersky DDoS Protection or Hybrid Cloud Security. Once you understand Zabbix, then it is easy to customize those web pages and graphs for our customer use. It is fully automated to your requirements. Zabbix is working fine with no issues, and I am satisfied with it. We have combined Zabbix and SolarWinds. The integration works fine, and it is easy to integrate Zabbix with the IT environment. We were trying to purchase MDR (Managed Detection and Response), but we are not working on that. I don't have real experience with MDR. We are using Falcon software for that. We are working with Falcon Complete, not with Sandbox. We are not using Kaspersky for business or cloud protection. For that, we are using Zabbix CrowdStrike Falcon Complete solution. I have given this review an overall rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"It's the best solution. Great. I would rate the overall solution ten out of ten."

"Zabbix can use old data to current data to set the threshold. We can use previous data to set the threshold."

"Zabbix is good for discovery."

"The calculations part is the most valuable."

"The most valuable feature is the alert and alarm monitoring."

"Zabbix has high scalability. I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is the protocol to manage anything."

"It's a flexible solution."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"The dashboard and the graph section could be a little bit more professional."

"The only issue we have had with Zabbix is when we decided to make an update or upgrade."

"I would like to see a more flexible mobile client, and better HA out of the box."

"The APM monitoring has room for improvement, although I hear that the new 5.2 version has some improvements in that area, and I'd like to give that a go. I would like to see a few more templates out there for different styles of monitoring. I use the Grafana interface for reporting. I would also like it to have an out-of-the-box ability to email reports. You can create reports, but to be able to email those reports would be really helpful. I've got users who are not interested in logging in and generating a report. They want it all pre-canned and sent to an email address. It would also be really handy if we could pin certain reports up onto platforms such as Teams or SharePoint. A GUI for the proxy server would be cool to have for debugging purposes and for the support teams to have a look at, but I don't know whether that's really feasible to do. I get enough from the log files themselves."

"It should be easy to modify the front end."

"I had problems using Zabbix when working with SUSE Enterprise; many companies use SUSE."

"The user interface could be better."

"For us, the initial setup was complex"

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

"I was using the free, Community Edition."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"We’re using the free version, which covers all our current needs."

"The tool's licensing is good."

"It is reasonable."

"My manager is very happy because it doesn't cost anything."

"The solution is free. However, many open-sourced tools start out free but eventually start charging."

"It is free, which allows us to reduce costs."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I think Zabbix is economical, whereas SolarWinds is expensive. SolarWinds has a lot of secure features, but Zabbix is providing everything free of cost. Zabbix is economical, and you can install it...

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts. I think Zabbix needs to improve the customization better. At present, I am satisfied with the functionality ...

Comparisons

No data available

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 8% of the time

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 7% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Download Zabbix product report

January 2026

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba