CrowdStrike Falcon vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #18 with an average rating of 6.0. CrowdStrike holds a 4.6% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 137 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

50,469 Views
3,028 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Read 7 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews

1,365 Views
1,215 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

CrowdStrike Falcon and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus compete in the cybersecurity realm. CrowdStrike Falcon is favored for its competitive pricing and customer support, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is renowned for its extensive features and integration capabilities.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon provides real-time threat intelligence, a robust endpoint protection platform, and an intuitive user interface. It is also cloud-native, allowing for seamless security updates. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus stands out with its deep threat analysis, comprehensive integration within the Palo Alto ecosystem, and advanced reputation scoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could enhance its integration with third-party applications and provide more detailed threat insights. Additionally, expanding its existing threat analysis capabilities would be beneficial. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus may benefit from simplifying its user interface, reducing deployment complexity, and enhancing user support for non-native integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its quick and easy cloud-based deployment, paired with responsive customer service. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, though thorough, may require a more involved setup process due to its extensive integration capabilities but is well-supported in resolving complex issues.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cost-effective solution with predictable pricing, yielding a good return on investment by helping mitigate security breaches. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, while potentially involving higher upfront costs, promises a high ROI through its comprehensive features and detailed threat intelligence, offering long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

137

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (1st), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (1st), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 4.6%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CrowdStrike Falcon	4.6%
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	1.3%
Other	94.1%

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Featured Reviews

Waleed Omar

Information Security Specialist at Arab Open University

Provides effective real-time threat detection with potential for cost optimization

Some features such as device control, firewall management, and file analysis are standalone products that we need to purchase separately. If these features came out of the box within the product, it would be much more beneficial for us. Other providers such as SentinelOne include these features in their base product. We attended a CrowdStrike Falcon event where they discussed some shallow AI features, but we cannot see these in our panel yet. We work with different solutions such as Darktrace and SocRadar, where AI features are automatically displayed in our dashboards after release. However, for CrowdStrike Falcon, we cannot see these features.

Read full review

reviewer9216065

Sr. Cloud Security Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Seamless integration into existing ecosystem empowers effective threat detection

The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is its seamless integration into the Palo Alto Networks ecosystem, allowing the threat intelligence feeds to be automatically consumed without manual effort. It uses the STIX format, which is automatically understood by the firewalls. AutoFocus also excels in behavioral analytics and reputation scoring, providing thorough threat analysis.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Regarding features, I appreciate its integration capabilities with identity providers...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"CrowdStrike displays a threat score when it detects an infection. This is helpful because not all detections are the same. It will classify them as ransomware, malware, phishing, etc. This feature helps us prioritize and cross-check with other EDR tools."

"The most valuable features in CrowdStrike Falcon are the full EDR with antivirus, hunting, reporting, and RTR remote control."

"The initial setup is very simple."

"The solution is silent and sits on your system as one single agent."

"This solution has made the lives of the IT staff much easier, compared to the previous one."

"There's almost no maintenance required. It's very low if there's any at all."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it is robust and can detect almost every malicious activity that occurs within the endpoint."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."

"The most valuable feature is alerting."

"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."

"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."

"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."

"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."

Cons

"The UI is not efficient."

"The biggest issue with Falcon as a standalone product is it doesn't have very much reporting."

"I want more ability to customize how you summarize the data. The default views are fine, but it would be interesting to be able to customize them based on the kind of data you want to see immediately. This can help the administrator gain an immediate overview and reduce the investigation time."

"The tool is more expensive than other products in the market."

"One thing that is not yet available is attack simulation."

"CrowdStrike Falcon by itself does not supply in-depth reporting."

"CrowdStrike Falcon sometimes wrongly flags things as malicious. Let's say a user is active on Chrome only. Sometimes, our cross-segmenting will fetch from the backend data and show that it is malicious because of memory or CPU utilization."

"It does take more time to scan than other solutions."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."

"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."

"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."

"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of CrowdStrike Falcon is expensive and should be reduced."

"Crowdstrike Falcon is relatively cheap."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. I don't think we are getting charged more than what it is worth. It is fair, but I do not like how it is a la carte. I realize they do that so other organizations can buy and get the agent, getting it cheaper than you could otherwise. However, if you want the main core package, which has all the main features with the exception of maybe the multi-cloud protections, that can get pricier for an organization. So, you have to pick and choose what you want. I do not care for a la carte pricing."

"This solution offers annual subscriptions. The pricing for this solution could be reduced."

"CrowdStrike is well priced. On a yearly basis, it costs between $60 and $100 per user."

"The solution isn't very costly; it's affordable."

"There is no license required to use this solution."

"Our company pays approximately US$ 65,000 annually for 900 machines."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Performing Arts

16%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	34
Large Enterprise	62

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I feel that Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus can improve, especially since most of the OEMs are implementing MDR, Managed Service feature, which is still not available with Palo Alto. The MDR feature i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus for threat monitoring, and it is provided by the OEM itself. I use the threat data correlation feature, which correlates with Cortex. We can use it for data corre...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

As a partner with Palo Alto Networks, my email is Sarvajit at bsrgroup.in. My job title is Technical Manager. I confirm that we will publish these reviews on peerspot.com in written or audio format...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 2% of the time

Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 2% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 17% of the time

Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 15% of the time

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 15% of the time

Proofpoint ET Intelligence vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 14% of the time

Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 12% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

February 2026

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

January 2026

Download Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CrowdStrike Falcon Platform

Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon provides cutting-edge endpoint detection with automatic alerts, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration capabilities. Cloud-native architecture and AI-driven processes ensure scalable protection and efficient threat remediation.

CrowdStrike Falcon is recognized for its robust EDR and threat intelligence features that enhance security and streamline operations. Its lightweight agent minimizes system impact while offering real-time monitoring and detailed reporting. This platform uses cloud-native architecture for scalable, consistent protection, significantly reducing administrative demands. AI and machine learning empower precise threat hunting and behavioral analysis, which mitigates false positives and boosts cybersecurity efficiency. Users seek improvements in integration with other systems, reporting functions, and compatibility with specific operating systems. While the solution handles malware mitigation and threat response efficiently, suggestions for on-demand scanning, enhanced visibility, and better dashboard features are noted.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Automatic Alert System: Provides instant alerts to enhance threat detection.
Robust EDR: Offers advanced endpoint detection capabilities.
Threat Intelligence: Delivers detailed insights for proactive security measures.
Real-time Monitoring: Enables continuous security assessments.
Seamless Integration Options: Streamlines operations with existing infrastructure.
Lightweight Agent: Minimizes system impact, maintaining performance efficiency.
Cloud-native Architecture: Provides scalable, consistent protection against threats.
AI and ML-driven Processes: Offers accurate threat hunting and behavioral analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users expect from CrowdStrike Falcon?

Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection for endpoints using cutting-edge technologies.
Reduced Administrative Burden: Simplifies management of security incidents.
Efficient Threat Remediation: Minimizes downtime with quick threat response actions.
Improved Threat Visibility: Provides detailed reports and insights.
Scalable Protection: Ensures adaptable security measures across multiple devices.

In technology sectors, CrowdStrike Falcon commonly supports endpoint protection and threat response initiatives, allowing companies to replace traditional antivirus systems with more advanced solutions. In finance, it secures sensitive data across multiple platforms, ensuring compliance. In healthcare, real-time security analysis protects patient data on critical devices like servers and laptops, utilizing AI to enhance cybersecurity defenses.

CrowdStrike

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Telkom Indonesia

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

December 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.