CrowdStrike Falcon vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 6.0. CrowdStrike holds a 5.1% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 137 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

49,388 Views
2,469 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Read 7 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews

1,321 Views
1,149 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

CrowdStrike Falcon and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus compete in the cybersecurity realm. CrowdStrike Falcon is favored for its competitive pricing and customer support, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is renowned for its extensive features and integration capabilities.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon provides real-time threat intelligence, a robust endpoint protection platform, and an intuitive user interface. It is also cloud-native, allowing for seamless security updates. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus stands out with its deep threat analysis, comprehensive integration within the Palo Alto ecosystem, and advanced reputation scoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could enhance its integration with third-party applications and provide more detailed threat insights. Additionally, expanding its existing threat analysis capabilities would be beneficial. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus may benefit from simplifying its user interface, reducing deployment complexity, and enhancing user support for non-native integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its quick and easy cloud-based deployment, paired with responsive customer service. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, though thorough, may require a more involved setup process due to its extensive integration capabilities but is well-supported in resolving complex issues.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cost-effective solution with predictable pricing, yielding a good return on investment by helping mitigate security breaches. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, while potentially involving higher upfront costs, promises a high ROI through its comprehensive features and detailed threat intelligence, offering long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

137

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (1st), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (1st), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

17th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 5.1%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CrowdStrike Falcon	5.1%
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus	1.2%
Other	93.7%

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Featured Reviews

Waleed Omar

Information Security Specialist at Arab Open University

Provides effective real-time threat detection with potential for cost optimization

Some features such as device control, firewall management, and file analysis are standalone products that we need to purchase separately. If these features came out of the box within the product, it would be much more beneficial for us. Other providers such as SentinelOne include these features in their base product. We attended a CrowdStrike Falcon event where they discussed some shallow AI features, but we cannot see these in our panel yet. We work with different solutions such as Darktrace and SocRadar, where AI features are automatically displayed in our dashboards after release. However, for CrowdStrike Falcon, we cannot see these features.

Read full review

Reviewer921606

Sr. Cloud Security Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Seamless integration into existing ecosystem empowers effective threat detection

The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is its seamless integration into the Palo Alto Networks ecosystem, allowing the threat intelligence feeds to be automatically consumed without manual effort. It uses the STIX format, which is automatically understood by the firewalls. AutoFocus also excels in behavioral analytics and reputation scoring, providing thorough threat analysis.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The real-time analytics aspect of CrowdStrike performs well because we get all logs in real-time, with no delay, allowing us to take action immediately."

"The most valuable aspects of CrowdStrike Falcon for me are its device observability, identification, and software and OS recognition."

"The machine learning behavior for anomaly detection is a valuable feature. It helps identify any suspicious or unusual activities within the system."

"We have seen a reduction to the performance hit to our operating systems."

"CrowdStrike has improved our incident response capabilities."

"The malware protection is the most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon."

"The initial setup is a very fast process."

"The most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon are the AI in detecting and real-time detections."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."

"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."

"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."

"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."

"The most valuable feature is alerting."

"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."

Cons

"The content-filtering features for children could be improved. We have young grandchildren aged 12 and 8. My daughter, their mother, wants to keep them from getting in trouble on the net. She looked at all these other solutions from Google, Microsoft, etc., and she couldn't figure out how to make any of those work. I told her that I bet CrowdStrike could handle this. Sure enough, CrowdStrike can do exactly that. It's the same solution that the Defense Department gets. It works, but it's a little complicated to implement. It could be simpler to set the policies."

"To simplify the budgeting process for our clients, CrowdStrike should consider offering bundled packages that include essential features."

"Dashboard creation is one of the areas for improvement in CrowdStrike Falcon. Sometimes, management asks for a custom dashboard, so my team has to collect data from CrowdStrike Falcon, integrate that in Splunk, then create the dashboard in Splunk. The Splunk dashboard is more elaborate, so the CrowdStrike Falcon dashboard needs improvement. Another area for improvement in the tool is the malware detection report, as it needs to be more detailed and include some graphics so that if you want to present that data in a nutshell, it's easier to do. For example, the report should consist of some graphical representation that shows a month's worth of data. In terms of an additional feature I'd like CrowdStrike Falcon to have, it's the device posture assessment feature that detects the device posture within the network. Whichever device connects to the corporate network, my company should be able to analyze the device posture. Then there should be communication with the network, which means that as soon as a device connects, CrowdStrike Falcon can assess the device posture, detect its corporate asset, and decide whether it should be allowed on the network."

"The console is a little cluttered and at times, finding what you're looking for is not intuitive."

"In terms of features, I would like them to add detailed logging functionality in CrowdStrike. Currently, CrowdStrike detects the threats immediately based on the IOCs and the signature-based policies or many threat behaviors, but in terms of logging those threats, it is not very good. The information that they provide in the logs is very little. They can build more analytics into it."

"I would love to see more investment in Insight because CrowdStrike have an opportunity to potentially displace some of the vulnerability management vendors with the visibility they can see over time. I want to see them continue to evolve, e.g., what other things can they disrupt which are operational things we have to continue to do as an organization."

"Basically, they don't cover legacy OS or applications. That's the only issue we're concerned about"

"They should provide us with good visibility for everything."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."

"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."

"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."

"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Crowdstrike Falcon is relatively cheap."

"The pricing will depend upon your volume of usage."

"I do not have experience with the cost or licensing of the product."

"It is an expensive product, but I think it is well worth the investment."

"The pricing is definitely high but you get what you pay for, and it's not so high that it prices itself out of the market."

"As I'm part of the technical team, not the budgeting team, I don't have information on CrowdStrike Falcon pricing."

"It's an expensive solution but you get a very good product for the price. Compared to other products, SentinelOne is definitely cheaper and the Microsoft E5 package is probably more expensive. Not many companies are willing to purchase CrowdStrike Falcon in Turkey due to the cost, but the market is changing."

"Our licensing fees were between $50,000 and $60,000 per year, which was pretty expensive for a small business."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Performing Arts

15%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	34
Large Enterprise	62

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I feel that Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus can improve, especially since most of the OEMs are implementing MDR, Managed Service feature, which is still not available with Palo Alto. The MDR feature i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus for threat monitoring, and it is provided by the OEM itself. I use the threat data correlation feature, which correlates with Cortex. We can use it for data corre...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?

As a partner with Palo Alto Networks, my email is Sarvajit at bsrgroup.in. My job title is Technical Manager. I confirm that we will publish these reviews on peerspot.com in written or audio format...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 2% of the time

Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 2% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 18% of the time

Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 17% of the time

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 17% of the time

Proofpoint ET Intelligence vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Compared 15% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

January 2026

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

December 2025

Download Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CrowdStrike Falcon Platform

Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon provides cutting-edge endpoint detection with automatic alerts, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration capabilities. Cloud-native architecture and AI-driven processes ensure scalable protection and efficient threat remediation.

CrowdStrike Falcon is recognized for its robust EDR and threat intelligence features that enhance security and streamline operations. Its lightweight agent minimizes system impact while offering real-time monitoring and detailed reporting. This platform uses cloud-native architecture for scalable, consistent protection, significantly reducing administrative demands. AI and machine learning empower precise threat hunting and behavioral analysis, which mitigates false positives and boosts cybersecurity efficiency. Users seek improvements in integration with other systems, reporting functions, and compatibility with specific operating systems. While the solution handles malware mitigation and threat response efficiently, suggestions for on-demand scanning, enhanced visibility, and better dashboard features are noted.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Automatic Alert System: Provides instant alerts to enhance threat detection.
Robust EDR: Offers advanced endpoint detection capabilities.
Threat Intelligence: Delivers detailed insights for proactive security measures.
Real-time Monitoring: Enables continuous security assessments.
Seamless Integration Options: Streamlines operations with existing infrastructure.
Lightweight Agent: Minimizes system impact, maintaining performance efficiency.
Cloud-native Architecture: Provides scalable, consistent protection against threats.
AI and ML-driven Processes: Offers accurate threat hunting and behavioral analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users expect from CrowdStrike Falcon?

Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection for endpoints using cutting-edge technologies.
Reduced Administrative Burden: Simplifies management of security incidents.
Efficient Threat Remediation: Minimizes downtime with quick threat response actions.
Improved Threat Visibility: Provides detailed reports and insights.
Scalable Protection: Ensures adaptable security measures across multiple devices.

In technology sectors, CrowdStrike Falcon commonly supports endpoint protection and threat response initiatives, allowing companies to replace traditional antivirus systems with more advanced solutions. In finance, it secures sensitive data across multiple platforms, ensuring compliance. In healthcare, real-time security analysis protects patient data on critical devices like servers and laptops, utilizing AI to enhance cybersecurity defenses.

CrowdStrike

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Telkom Indonesia

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

December 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.