No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs One Identity Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.7
CyberArk IGA improves efficiency, reduces risk, and saves costs with automation, though some complex cases take longer to mature.
Sentiment score
6.0
Companies gain positive ROI with One Identity Manager through automation, reducing manual effort, enhancing efficiency, and improving security compliance.
Any deployment takes time to mature, and CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla does provide benefits immediately in terms of quick adoption of finding out the privileged access identities by running through their crawler.
Associate Director at a legal firm with 10,001+ employees
Return of investment has been seen in fewer employee count needed to manage the access and role, which can be a very tedious task in a huge enterprise business.
Soc For Ddi at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla saves me almost twenty to forty percent of my time in reducing all kinds of tasks.
Associate Team Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Without it, we would need thousands of additional people.
enterprise it architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Instead of spending on various systems, having one centralized system that handles all my organizational requirements helps save money.
IAM Consultant at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
Several users reported reduced onboarding and offboarding times by around 40% thanks to automated provisioning and de-provisioning.
Business Analyst at a startup based organization
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Users praise CyberArk IGA support for responsiveness and resources but note issues with response times and SLA discrepancies.
Sentiment score
6.6
One Identity Manager's support varies; premium is efficient, but standard often lacks expertise and has inconsistent response times.
Most of the time, they manage to provide a solution within two to three days, making their support highly rated and effective.
Associate Team Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The type of support agreement or contract you have with them determines the level of support provided.
Associate Director at a legal firm with 10,001+ employees
When I send a request, they respond, but getting an actual time slot to work with the customer to resolve the issue sometimes delays.
Presales Engineer at DGIT
If you have outages or critical production problems, you can count on the manufacturer to help resolve the situation.
Managing Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
They should focus on bringing in technically skilled individuals who understand the tools and technologies involved.
Back End Developer at DC Smarter
Compared to my experiences with other tools, their support is exemplary.
Senior Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
CyberArk IGA efficiently scales in cloud and hybrid environments, supporting growth with AI features and seamless system integration.
Sentiment score
7.0
One Identity Manager efficiently scales for large enterprises, supporting Kubernetes, cloud compatibility, and requires proper configuration for optimal performance.
For larger environments using CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla, scalability depends on the integration environment being implemented and the skill set behind it.
Head Of IT at NetPulse Limited
It is quite scalable, and we can definitely scale up or scale down.
Security Engineer at LTI Mindtree
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla works well for scalability as it supports distributed environments and integrates with cloud platforms, making it useful for hybrid and cloud setups.
CTO at Fraoula
It is architected so that key components can be scaled both horizontally and vertically to handle increasing loads from employee accounts to millions of external identities if needed.
Business Analyst at a startup based organization
Generally, if we need to add thousands of new users, we can ramp up container resources effectively.
Project Manager at B. Braun Group
It is highly scalable and capable of keeping up with the organization's growth needs, especially in the enterprise environment.
Technical Support Executive at Digitaltrack
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
CyberArk IGA is stable and reliable, with efficient performance, minor issues, and proactive communication maintaining seamless operation.
Sentiment score
7.6
One Identity Manager is stable and reliable, with high ratings, though new releases may introduce performance issues.
As long as you are maintaining the patches and upgrades in time, the vault, which is the main central component, is very good.
Associate Director at a legal firm with 10,001+ employees
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is quite stable, with no experience of data breaches or leakage.
CTO at Fraoula
I rate the stability of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla as very high, around nine to ten.
Associate Team Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
One Identity Manager is considered stable and dependable for enterprise identity management with a strong track record of uptime and reliability when implemented correctly.
Business Analyst at a startup based organization
It is widely seen as stable in production once properly configured, especially for Active Directory automation, user provisioning, de-provisioning, and role-based delegation.
Cyber Security Analyst at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
It has a strong core architecture, a reliable user lifecycle management engine, a strong workflow engine, and stable integrations with Active Directory, SAP, HR systems, and enterprise applications.
Sr.Technical Engineer at a retailer with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

CyberArk IGA requires enhancements in customization, integration, reporting, and automation to improve user experience and efficiency.
One Identity Manager requires performance and usability enhancements, streamlined processes, improved documentation, and better integration to address user challenges.
Careful consideration should be given when deciding about use cases and reaching out to the customer support team to check out the product compatibility and the integration with the end application that you may have in your environment before making a buying decision.
Soc For Ddi at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Integrating CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla with banking applications such as T24 is very tough to accomplish.
Presales Engineer at DGIT
I would suggest enhancing the reporting functionality of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla, as it could benefit from more customization or advanced filtering for auditing purposes.
Data Engineer at Baker Hughes
This lack of 24-hour support is problematic from a testing and development standpoint.
It is crucial for them to expand their support team to match their product's success.
Lead Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
When it comes to privileged access management, we need to know who has access to what, which is the central problem we want to solve.
Principal Cybersecurity Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

CyberArk IGA provides moderate pricing, cloud-based setup ease, and cost benefits with multi-year subscriptions, starting at $45,000 annually.
One Identity Manager offers flexible enterprise pricing, justifying high initial costs through automation, governance, and long-term savings.
The Zilla-powered module entry level may cost up to $45,000 per year, depending on how many applications and the user access is needed.
Soc For Ddi at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
My experience with the licensing cost shows that CyberArk is never reasonable on pricing.
Head Of IT at NetPulse Limited
Opting for multi-year subscriptions can be more economical.
CTO at Fraoula
On-premises might incur higher costs.
IAM DEVELOPER at a university with 10,001+ employees
We have a good enterprise license agreement, and we are very happy with what we get for the price we pay for it.
enterprise it architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Many customers find it fair and reasonable for enterprise use, though it can be expensive for smaller organizations due to total licensing and implementation cost.
Business Analyst at a startup based organization
 

Valuable Features

CyberArk IGA offers automated identity governance, enhances security, streamlines compliance, and improves efficiency with an intuitive interface and centralized management.
One Identity Manager automates identity management, enhances security, integrates with key systems, and offers customizability for enterprise needs.
The best feature is definitely the AI component, which includes evidence generation for audit and compliance, addressing one of our biggest challenges.
Data Engineer at Baker Hughes
The functionalities of CyberArk PAM include monitoring of activities, which are recorded live for auditing purposes, and it integrates into almost every environment seamlessly.
Head Of IT at NetPulse Limited
We definitely achieved a lot in terms of security, mitigating business risk across all assets, saving time, and reducing the risk of account compromise and access compromise.
Security Engineer at LTI Mindtree
It ensures high security through multiple approval processes, preventing unauthorized access and enhancing compliance by providing time-based access for privileged accounts with proper audit trails.
Principal Consultant at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It continuously monitors user behavior in real-time, triggering automated responses, and manages secure access for both on-premises and cloud applications using protocols such as SAML.
IAM DEVELOPER at a university with 10,001+ employees
Once you have some experience, it demonstrates best practices and guides you on the correct way to use the tool.
IAM Developer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
11th
Ranking in Identity Governance Administration (IGA)
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (12th)
One Identity Manager
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
1st
Ranking in Identity Governance Administration (IGA)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
184
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Identity Governance Administration (IGA) category, the mindshare of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is 4.9%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Manager is 10.6%, down from 14.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity Governance Administration (IGA) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
One Identity Manager10.6%
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla4.9%
Other84.5%
Identity Governance Administration (IGA)
 

Featured Reviews

Sasikiran Sakalabattina - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Team Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Automated lifecycle governance has reduced manual access work and strengthens audit readiness
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla significantly reduces manual access management efforts due to day-to-day activities. RBAC and role mining actually reduce manual access management efforts significantly. RBAC is the best feature, and it provides AI capabilities. The second feature I value most is identifying lifecycle management for joiner, mover, and leaver scenarios. CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla has one feature that provides strong access reviews, compliance reports, automation, and audit readiness with centralized governance. Centralized governance means we can handle everything at one point, making it a very strong feature. This is integrated with another feature such as SaaS integrations for strong security posture and faster provisioning with reduced operational overhead. These are the four features I value most, and with all my three years of experience, I use and appreciate these four features most. The impact of automation on my access reviews is that it automates the provisioning and de-provisioning. If I were to perform manual tasks such as provisioning and de-provisioning without automation, it would require a lot of time to handle. With this automation, we easily accomplish provisioning or de-provisioning. We simply get the Active Directory users and create the VPNs, cloud, and enterprise applications without any manual intervention. AI-driven role management and RBAC automation significantly reduce service tickets. Without automation, I would need to handle tickets, which involve a lot of manual work and requires additional manual employees. Without automation, this leads to approval delays and manual access assignment efforts. Automated access reviews provide simple audit reports, and by complying with the report, it improves audit readiness while reducing operational workload for IT and security teams.
Neha Chhangani - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Analyst at a startup based organization
Centralized identity governance has automated lifecycle management and simplifies compliance
One Identity Manager could be improved by making the initial setup and configuration simpler, especially for complex workflows and integrations. The user interface and reporting dashboards could also be more modern and intuitive with better out-of-the-box analytics. Additionally, clearer documentation and faster implementation guidance would help organizations get value more quickly. One specific challenge my team encountered was the complexity during initial configuration, especially when setting up custom workflows and role models which required more time and expertise. We also felt that out-of-the-box reports and dashboards are limited, and more customizable real-time analytics would be helpful. Better documentation and guided setup wizards would make adoption easier, particularly for teams new to identity governance tools. One improvement I think One Identity Manager needs is the enhanced self-service experience. The end-user self-service portal could be more intuitive with clearer guidance for access requests and password resets. Additionally, while integrations are solid, deeper cloud-native connectors and API-driven automation would help in hybrid and multi-cloud environments. A more responsive mobile interface or dedicated app for approvals and tasks would help managers who are often on the go. One more improvement is the built-in predictive insights or trend dashboards around access patterns and risk could improve proactive governance. More descriptive error messages and in-tool troubleshooting tips during setup configuration would reduce dependency on external documentation or support.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Governance Administration (IGA) solutions are best for your needs.
896,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Security Firm
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Retailer
6%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business109
Midsize Enterprise35
Large Enterprise121
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zilla Security?
I am aware of the pricing and licensing of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla. It is neither very cheap nor overly costly compared to other security service providers. Opting for multi-year subscription...
What needs improvement with Zilla Security?
I believe CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla can be improved by simplifying the workflow and the UI for managing access requests and approvals. Additionally, reducing the complexity of onboarding and co...
What is your primary use case for Zilla Security?
The usual use cases for CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla that my customers work with include monitoring access, recording it, and session control, as we primarily operate in the health tech and fintec...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Manager?
The pricing and licensing for One Identity Manager are definitely enterprise-focused and can get expensive depending on the number of managed identities and integrations. The automation and governa...
What needs improvement with One Identity Manager?
Initial deployments are complex and require proper planning. Role mapping needs to be done very carefully. Integration with legacy applications takes more time and these areas could be improved. In...
What is your primary use case for One Identity Manager?
One Identity Manager is used for centralized user identity and access management, privileged account management, access governance, compliance, and auditing purposes. In one of our projects, One Id...
 

Also Known As

Zilla Security
Quest One Identity Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Texas A&M, Sky Media, BHF Bank, Swiss Post, Union Investment, Wayne State University. More at OneIdentity.com/casestudies
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. One Identity Manager and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.
896,510 professionals have used our research since 2012.