Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CylanceENDPOINT vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CylanceENDPOINT
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
68th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
159
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (11th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of CylanceENDPOINT is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.6%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform3.6%
CylanceENDPOINT0.3%
Other96.1%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Raphael Haroun  Ikyagh - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Administrator at Letshego
Stable, good for malware detection and prevention
I use it for general endpoint protection and the usual stuff like malware detection and prevention It secures my environment.  One thing that could be easier is initiating scans. If I want to scan an extra drive, it should be more straightforward. It's a bit clunky. I have been using it for…
Abhimanyu Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Threat detection is effective, and the solution provides good control over device access, but it still needs better troubleshooting options for agent-related issues.
From an improvement perspective, I am looking for a way to troubleshoot situations where the endpoint agent becomes corrupted and requires reinstallation, as there is currently no option to resolve these issues without rebooting the system. I give it a rating of seven because, in today’s scenario, the portal is complicated to navigate. The Trellix Endpoint Security Platform dashboard is somewhat difficult to understand, and it takes considerable time to familiarize oneself with the tools and policies compared to other solutions. For on-premises deployment, I would also like to highlight that the architecture is quite complex, which is an area Trellix Endpoint Security Platform should consider improving.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It secures my environment."
"The product has a robust reporting feature"
"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."
"I recommend Trellix Endpoint Security to others as it seems like one of the industry standards and is fairly stable."
"The most valuable features are the prevention layer that detects the signature value and prevents threats in the network."
"The technical support services are good."
"The thing that I like is that they have gathered almost all the products in one management server, the ePolicy Orchestrator."
"Threat prevention is valuable because most clients use other solutions like antivirus as part of web protection. I don't find that kind of solution useful."
"It's a stable solution with good performance."
 

Cons

"One thing that could be easier is initiating scans."
"Looking at the current ePolicy orchestrator, and the transition of most vendors to the cloud, they need to do an improvement with the current dashboard or the overall aesthetic of their GUI."
"It didn't work well for some of the use cases. We have different use cases for each entity. Their support is also not good and needs improvement."
"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."
"I've encountered minor challenges related to encryption."
"The platform needs improvement in terms of handling heavy databases."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
"The initial setup isn't so easy. You need to know what you are doing."
"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I would rate the cost as four to five, considering it's normal compared to other products. I find it nominal and worth the money."
"Its price is very high. It is higher than its competitors, and it should be less."
"There are some extra expenses for using the product, in addition to licensing related to the maintenance of the product."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."
"The product pricing is high."
"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."
"I do licensing on an annual basis and this is what I always recommend to my clients over the monthly option."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business67
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise61
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: January 2026.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.