CylanceENDPOINT vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

BlackBerry and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. BlackBerry is ranked #61, while Trellix is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8. BlackBerry holds a 0.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and CylanceENDPOINT are products in the cybersecurity domain. CylanceENDPOINT offers superior features, while Trellix Endpoint Security Platform provides better pricing and support.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has comprehensive threat detection capabilities, integration options, and real-time analytics. CylanceENDPOINT provides AI-driven malware prevention, low resource consumption, and potent defensive capabilities with advanced AI.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform ensures straightforward deployment and flexible integration with robust customer service. CylanceENDPOINT features quick installation with minimal configuration, coupled with efficient support, emphasizing seamless AI integration.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers competitive setup costs aimed at maximizing ROI through long-term strategies. CylanceENDPOINT, although initially pricier, achieves substantial ROI by reducing operational overhead and leveraging preventive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CylanceENDPOINT is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.4%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.6%
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.4%
CylanceENDPOINT	0.3%
Other	92.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Raphael Haroun Ikyagh

Network Administrator at Letshego

Stable, good for malware detection and prevention

I use it for general endpoint protection and the usual stuff like malware detection and prevention It secures my environment. One thing that could be easier is initiating scans. If I want to scan an extra drive, it should be more straightforward. It's a bit clunky. I have been using it for…

Read full review

PankajKumar24

IT Manager at Gigabit Technologies Pvt Ltd

Advanced threat prevention has strengthened incident response and customized security workflows

The biggest advantage of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is the ATP solution, which provides advanced threat prevention. Machine learning algorithms are available in the product as part of the threat anti-malware, including predictive machine learning and behavioral analysis, which are integral to the anti-malware module of EPP. In terms of my experience with the machine learning algorithms for analysis and threat detection, we are analyzing logs provided by Trellix, but we are not able to conduct specific machine learning analysis on those logs. The automated response mechanisms in the products help with incident management because we have to create playbooks in Trellix console for automation, which we need to enable. The customizable dashboard of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform definitely contributes to the decision-making process, as we customize the dashboard according to customer requirements. When it comes to integration aspects, we are able to integrate Trellix Endpoint Security Platform with SIEM or SOAR solutions using the ePO console, which enhances threat detection capabilities. Reporting and analytics aspects have an impact on security posture assessment, as we are able to fetch reports in the ePO console customized according to customer requirements for downloading and sending via email.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution allows control over the user and his machine through Cortex XDR security policies."

"The policy configuration is great, the granularity of policies that are available is very helpful, it is straightforward to set up, and it has pretty much everything we need and works well within the Palo Alto ecosystem."

"The information the dashboard provides is very clear."

"The good thing about the product is that it's always scanning."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

"The most valuable aspect of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for me is its integration with AI detection, where we get to know the behavioral detection based on users, traffic patterns, and different services that we consume."

"From a single pane of glass, you can easily manage all of your endpoints."

"Technical support is the best in class, in my opinion, because they have invested heavily in research and development."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It secures my environment."

"We receive good protection with this solution."

"I found the initial setup to be easy."

"Anyone can use it, the protection is good, and they have all of the features."

"When Intel acquired McAfee they worked on the protocol so that all vendors can work on the same platform, which is a very big improvement because all McAfee products talk to each other and other vendors' products can join this platform as well so it makes it more powerful on the enterprise side for McAfee."

"The most valuable features are the adaptive tech on McAfee."

"McAfee Endpoint Protection is a good product that's easy to administer and provides endpoint protection for desktops, laptops, and servers, including anti-virus, anti-malware, anti-spam, DLP, and encryption."

"Tech support is responsive. They're good, the very best."

"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to manage the solution from anywhere and having an overview of the companies security."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"In general, the price could be more competitive."

"We have found that there are times Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks does not detect some of the viruses, we have to use another protection solution called Kaspersky."

"The dashboard could use some significant improvement, just making it more useful with more information."

"There are some false positives. What our guys would have liked is that it would have been easier to manipulate as soon as they found a false positive that they knew was a false positive. How to do so was not obvious. Some people complained about it. The interface, the ESM, is not user-friendly."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a strong tool, but it is true that digesting information sometimes makes the tool go a little bit slower."

"However, if you do not have Palo Alto in your environment, you are paying these additional services just for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, so it is not a cost-effective solution."

"While using Cortex, I noticed some aspects that could be improved, such as increasing the synchronization speed between XDR and Xnor."

"Whenever the tool releases a new version when deploying the product across the organization, I feel like there are some disturbances in the CPU usage after upgrading the tool to the latest version."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"One thing that could be easier is initiating scans."

"The solution has problematic encryption, which needs reforming."

"Intrusion detection and intervention seem to be falling behind the competition."

"I would like to have the ability to have more control over the deployment in the next release. If you have this console in the cloud, you cannot make pilot groups for deploying the agents. We only have the current group. So, as soon as you inject the software, it will go directly into production, which doesn't work for us. We need to build up pilot groups slowly. We already requested to have this feature on the cloud, and we are still waiting."

"The Linux support is very poor."

"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."

"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."

"The vendor should simplify the way they bundle the products because it's very hard to explain to customers what products contain which features."

"There are certain shortcomings in the features concerning DLP in Trellix, where certain additions must be made in the future."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"The pricing is a little high. It is per user per year."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

"Cortex XDR’s pricing is very reasonable."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year."

"The pricing is great and licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is comparable to other solutions on the market."

"When comparing the solution to others it is a bit expensive. We are on a monthly license."

"There are some extra expenses for using the product, in addition to licensing related to the maintenance of the product."

"Pricing is fair."

"Its price is reasonable, but it could be made free."

"I am happy with the pricing."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	48

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	68
Midsize Enterprise	38
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?

I don't have visibility on pricing because it is negotiated by a different team, as I look after the technical side.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform vs CylanceENDPOINT

Compared 41% of the time

Kitecyber Platform vs CylanceENDPOINT

Compared 17% of the time

More CylanceENDPOINT Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

May 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

May 2026

Download CylanceENDPOINT product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

April 2026

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

CylanceENDPOINT offers a cutting-edge approach to endpoint protection with its AI-driven technology, providing robust defense against cyber threats by leveraging machine learning for rapid threat detection and prevention.

Securing digital environments with CylanceENDPOINT involves utilizing advanced artificial intelligence to proactively identify malware, zero-day exploits, and ransomware before they cause harm. Its streamlined deployment and scalability suit businesses seeking enhanced endpoint security that minimizes system impact while maximizing threat management. With constant innovation, CylanceENDPOINT stays ahead in thwarting sophisticated cyber threats, offering a reliable shield for enterprise networks.

What are the key features of CylanceENDPOINT?

Artificial Intelligence: Employs AI to identify and neutralize threats effectively.
Predictive Analysis: Anticipates potential attacks to prevent breaches ahead of time.
Minimal System Impact: Ensures low performance overhead during scanning and updates.
Scalability: Adapts easily to organizations of all sizes for extensive coverage.
Threat Intelligence: Constant updates to remain vigilant against new attack vectors.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Downtime: Quick threat identification minimizes operational disruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Lower expenses associated with data breach recovery.
Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens organization's defenses effectively.
Resource Optimization: Frees IT staff to focus on strategic projects by automating tasks.

Implementation of CylanceENDPOINT across industries like healthcare, finance, and manufacturing sees tailored approaches that adhere to sector-specific regulations and environments, allowing seamless integration while ensuring compliance and security. Its adaptability provides industry-relevant solutions that maintain integrity and protect sensitive data from evolving cyber threats.

BlackBerry

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.