No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DataStax Enterprise vs Qdrant comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.4
DataStax Enterprise accelerates development, reduces deployment time, and ensures 99.9% uptime, enhancing efficiency despite version update challenges.
Sentiment score
5.5
Qdrant boosts ROI by cutting costs, improving productivity, and enhancing efficiency through payload filtering and open-source flexibility.
We have seen a return on investment with DataStax Enterprise as we saved a lot of money and time, despite investing more on infrastructure; our ongoing business success with a 99.9% uptime helps us earn more.
Senior database engineer at ToTheNew
Earlier it was around 15 months, and we have been able to deploy and scale our application within 10 months.
Software Developer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
We realized significant cost savings after migrating to DataStax Enterprise, as the previously slow critical queries now run significantly faster, improving efficiency and performance metrics across the board.
Solution Architect at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Thanks to Qdrant's open-source nature, our initial licensing and setup costs were nearly zero, allowing for swift testing and launch of our RAG prototype.
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
This lowers our LLM input token consumption by roughly 30 to 40 percent, translating directly into lower monthly OpenAI API bills.
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The time saved is substantial, with nearly three weeks or more for projects deployed with Qdrant Cloud in no-code platforms.
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.8
DataStax Enterprise's customer service is praised for its responsive support, swift issue resolution, and excellent escalation process.
Sentiment score
4.8
Qdrant customer service excels with developer-focused support via Discord and documentation, with reduced need for direct contact.
I would rate the customer support a 10 because I always receive the help I need from them.
Devops Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Any requests I have raised receive prompt responses, often within minutes.
Solution Architect at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Real-time transaction processing, both reads and writes, is where DataStax Enterprise shines the most.
Senior Software Engineer at Deloitte
It's open source, so we house it on our server.
Chief Ai Scientist at Predictive Systems
The documentation provided by Qdrant covers most queries effectively.
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
Qdrant's customer support is responsive and developer-focused.
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
DataStax Enterprise offers scalable, multi-region deployment, reducing costs and enhancing efficiency with auto-scaling and improved response times.
Sentiment score
5.7
Qdrant excels in scalability and performance, efficiently managing large datasets, particularly when deployed in Docker for enhanced growth.
Overall, we saw a decrease in operational costs due to better resource usage and less manual work, which made my team more efficient and allowed us to focus on new projects.
DevSecOps Engineer (Software Development Engineer II) at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
DataStax Enterprise's scalability is very fast with linear scalability and hence is very scalable.
Senior Software Engineer at Deloitte
The active-active architecture helped us really scale and provide data to both Singapore and Indian users.
Senior Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
In the recruiting agency project, the reliance on the vector database has expanded from storing hundreds of resumes to thousands.
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
When Qdrant is deployed in Docker, it scales really fast, and you can assign multiple CPUs to enhance performance.
Analyst at Synergy Connect
Qdrant is highly scalable, supporting both vertical and horizontal scaling across massive vector data sets.
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
DataStax Enterprise offers high stability, reducing downtime by 40%, and effectively handles large-scale data, despite occasional node issues.
Sentiment score
7.9
Qdrant, built in Rust, is praised for reliability, fast queries, and precision, despite minor cloud termination limitations.
DataStax Enterprise provides enough stability for our organization, and scaling can be done up to terabytes and petabytes.
Senior Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
After using DataStax Enterprise, our system downtime dropped by approximately 40%, helping us avoid lost revenue.
DevSecOps Engineer (Software Development Engineer II) at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Built in Rust, it delivers sub-15 millisecond response times and rock-solid update and write-ahead logging to guarantee that newly indexed data is immediately searchable without dropping queries or producing inconsistent context for LLMs.
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
You need to patch Qdrant as soon as patches are released.
Co Founder & CEO at SaYukth Private Limited
It is easy to use whether on LangChain or on its own.
Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

DataStax Enterprise users desire improved backup, faster restoration, user-friendly UI, intuitive monitoring, cost efficiency, automation, and enhanced support.
Qdrant needs developer experience enhancements, including multi-query fusion, embedding support, schema management, and improved deployment, UI, and documentation.
There should be an alternative for restoring where data can be provided to live traffic so it does not impact customers in the case of a disaster.
Devops Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Better compatibility with prior versions in terms of codebases should also be improved.
Senior Software Engineer at Deloitte
For example, it can implement some cost optimization where the license can be expensive, and compared to open-source Cassandra, cost is a concern.
Senior Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Fast large-scale filtering operations could be implemented, such as automatic index suggestions, adaptive query planning, and smart indexing of metadata fields, which would make Qdrant even more efficient.
Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
While it has clustering functionality, it is not easy to set up, and not everyone can configure the clustering, so there is room for improvement in the clustering configuration.
Co Founder & CEO at SaYukth Private Limited
Incorporating embedding features directly in Qdrant Cloud would eliminate the need to depend on external solutions.
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Qdrant provides cost-effective, predictable billing and zero upfront investment, with open-source access and easy setup options.
For smaller organizations working under a tight budget, it might not be very affordable compared to other alternatives.
Senior Software Engineer at Deloitte
I was not involved in the licensing for DataStax Enterprise, which is managed by a different team, but I understand it operates on a core-based licensing model, which is standard.
Solution Architect at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
The core product is open source under Apache 2.0, so initial experimentation and local integration testing cost nothing.
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Using Qdrant is free.
Chief Ai Scientist at Predictive Systems
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, since I am using only the free tier of Qdrant Cloud, there are no setup costs involved.
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

DataStax Enterprise excels in scalability, reliability, and management, enhancing productivity and application performance with advanced features and tools.
Qdrant provides fast, efficient vector search with hybrid indexing, Python support, and open-source configuration for scalable AI projects.
The scaling and speed of data access have benefited my team because the scaling and the speeding of data provide linear scale as well as multi-data centers' real-time replication of data such that we can maintain uptime even with the loss of multiple data centers.
Senior Software Engineer at Deloitte
I can confirm that the outcomes of using DataStax Enterprise show that our database uptime has increased drastically to around 99.9%.
Senior database engineer at ToTheNew
DataStax Enterprise has positively impacted my organization because during research for a NoSQL database, developers are very positive about using DataStax Enterprise because of its really easy setup and the querying to the database is very efficient.
Software Developer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
The ability of Qdrant to handle high-dimensional vectors for my AI projects is pretty fast, and I think it's the best we have used so far.
Chief Ai Scientist at Predictive Systems
An accuracy boost was definitely observed from 45 to 50% using Faiss to around 85 to 95% using Qdrant, and the users are really happy as they are getting suggested really good schemes that would take a lot of time to find.
Analyst at Synergy Connect
Qdrant supports high-dimension vectors and cosine similarity, which any vector database should have, and it is pretty fast.
CTO at Honeycomb AI
 

Categories and Ranking

DataStax Enterprise
Ranking in Vector Databases
15th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
NoSQL Databases (11th)
Qdrant
Ranking in Vector Databases
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (5th), AI Data Analysis (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of DataStax Enterprise is 2.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qdrant is 6.3%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vector Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qdrant6.3%
DataStax Enterprise2.1%
Other91.6%
Vector Databases
 

Featured Reviews

Pooja Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Devops Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Reliable backup and recovery has protected critical telecom customer data in daily operations
When I was taking the backup with a data volume of 15 to 20 GB, the full backup running for the first time did not provide metrics to understand what percent of progress had been made. We had to read the logs, but we did not see any percentage in those logs. This is an improvement item for DataStax Enterprise to provide metrics, a bar, or a percentage so we can grasp how much data has been backed up or restored. There are no graphs available to make us aware of how long the process will take to complete, which is a drawback I noticed during backup and restore. In addition, I notice a huge time lag during restoration because each node takes a lot of time to be added to the pool and to the cluster node, one by one. The entire time the production is down presents a concerning situation. There should be an alternative for restoring where data can be provided to live traffic so it does not impact customers in the case of a disaster.
Pawel Cislo - PeerSpot reviewer
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Adaptive assistant has delivered faster grounded answers and has reduced token costs significantly
The main limitations I notice come down to developer experience and native features rather than performance. Building hybrid retrieval and fusion pipelines still requires considerable manual orchestration and code. Having more built-in multi-query fusion strategies natively inside Qdrant would be a significant time-saver. Additionally, managing dynamic metadata schemas and tracking index build progress during bulk ingest could be more transparent in the web UI. To make things easier for developers, Qdrant could provide more native tools for managing payload schema evolution over time. As metadata needs change in production RAG systems, updating existing payloads across large collections currently requires custom migration scripts. Built-in schema versioning and simpler automated index testing during CI/CD would make running Qdrant in rapidly evolving production environments even smoother. I rate Qdrant 9 out of 10 because its speed, sub-15 millisecond retrieval, and single-stage payload filtering make it top-tier for production RAG pipelines. I deduct one point mainly for developer experience. Setting up multi-query fusion still requires extra boilerplate code, payload metadata schema updates require custom migration scripts, and real-time visibility into HNSW graph indexing progress during bulk ingest could be improved in the web UI.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DataStax Enterprise?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is pretty good. I do not find any difficulty in it.
What needs improvement with DataStax Enterprise?
The user interface of DataStax Enterprise can be simpler and easier to use, especially for new users, and I think it should be improved in that area. Additionally, more built-in monitoring and aler...
What is your primary use case for DataStax Enterprise?
My main use cases for DataStax Enterprise are building a scalable and high availability application that needs to handle large amounts of data across multiple locations, and for real-time analytics...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qdrant?
I find Qdrant's pricing and licensing extremely straightforward and cost-effective. The core product is open source under Apache 2.0, so initial experimentation and local integration testing cost n...
What needs improvement with Qdrant?
Qdrant is available through a containerized Docker, but a normal deployment in Qdrant is not there, and that can actually be worked out. That was one aspect I thought about, because I need to have ...
What is your primary use case for Qdrant?
We have a full-fledged RAG system using Qdrant Vector Database, and that is how it has benefited us. For example, we have implemented a techno-commercial evaluator using that, and it is in producti...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ING, Netflix, UBS, eBay, Constant Contact, Aeris, Arise, ClearCapital, Dyn, Engine, Noble Group, Pantheon, Target
1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. BMW 5.Cisco 6. CocaCola 7. Dell 8. Disney 9. Google 10. HP 11. IBM 12. Intel 13. JPMorgan Chase 14. Kraft Heinz 15. L'Oreal 16. McDonalds 17. Merck 18. Microsoft 19. Nike20. Oracle 21. PG 22. PepsiCo 23. Procter and Gamble 24. Samsung 25. Shell 26. Sony 27. Toyota 28. Visa 29. Walmart 30. WeWork
Find out what your peers are saying about DataStax Enterprise vs. Qdrant and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.